Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research

Determination of suction range for penetration of suction caissons in sand

Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Civil Engineering Disaster Prevention and Mitigation, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266590, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266590, China; 3. Geotechnical Research Institute, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China

Received date: 2016-01-27

  Online published: 2018-06-05

Supported by

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51639002, 51379118) and Research Fund of Shandong University of Science and Technology (2015TDJH104).

Abstract

Penetration of the suction caisson closely depends on the suction pressure. If the magnitude of suction is set to be smaller, it will lead to a lower penetration velocity and increasing construction costs. The soil plug rises higher otherwise. Thus, the suction caisson cannot reach the desired depth, resulting in either insufficient bearing capacity for the requirements of foundation design, or the failure of sand foundation due to piping. The aim of the paper is to determine a reasonable suction range to meet requirements of engineering practice. The minimum suction is determined by using the static equilibrium method. The critical value of suction is obtained by the formulation of the effective stresses on the inside and outside of the bucket wall in terms of the Hencky’s stress equation. The maximum suction is obtained by using the mechanism of sand piping inside bucket. In addition, the maximum penetration depth of the caisson is determined in terms of the maximum and minimum suctions. Finally, the proposed calculation of suction are verified by the published data, and they have a very good agreement.

Cite this article

LI Da-yong, WU Yu-qi, ZHANG Yu-kun3, GAO Yu-feng3 . Determination of suction range for penetration of suction caissons in sand[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2017 , 38(4) : 985 -992 . DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.04.009

Outlines

/