岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 571-580.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0122

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同地震动强度下珊瑚礁砂地基中桩-土-结构 地震响应试验研究

吴琪1, 2,丁选明1, 2,陈志雄1, 2,陈育民3,彭宇1, 2   

  1. 1. 重庆大学 土木工程学院,重庆 400045;2. 重庆大学 山地城镇建设与新技术教育部重点实验室,重庆 400045; 3. 河海大学 土木与交通学院,江苏 南京 210098
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-22 修回日期:2019-05-21 出版日期:2020-02-11 发布日期:2020-02-09
  • 通讯作者: 丁选明,男,1980年生,博士,教授,主要从事土力学与地基基础工程、土动力学与工程振动、环境岩土工程等方面的教学和科研工作。E-mail: dxmhhu@163.com E-mail: wq_cqu@l63.com
  • 作者简介:吴琪,男,1992年生,博士研究生,主要从事地震液化等方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51622803,No.51878103,No.41831282)

Seismic response of pile-soil-structure in coral sand under different earthquake intensities

WU Qi1, 2, DING Xuan-ming1, 2, CHEN Zhi-xiong1, 2, CHEN Yu-min3, PENG Yu1, 2   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 2. Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 3. College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China
  • Received:2019-01-22 Revised:2019-05-21 Online:2020-02-11 Published:2020-02-09
  • Contact: DING Xuan-ming, male, born in 1980, PhD, Professor, Research interest: soil mechanics, ground foundation engineering, soil dynamics, engineering vibration and environmental geotechnics. E-mail: dxmhhu@163.com E-mail: wq_cqu@l63.com
  • About author:WU Qi, male, born in 1992, PhD candidate, specializing in the earthquake liquefaction. E-mail: wq_cqu@l63.com.
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51622803, 51878103, 41831282).

摘要: 珊瑚礁砂在地震作用下的场地响应受其特殊的工程性质影响。为揭示珊瑚砂场地桩基-地基-上部结构在地震作用下的动力响应特性,开展了不同地震动强度下珊瑚砂地基上3层框架结构群桩基础的振动台模型试验,对地基土和结构物的动力响应进行测试与分析,同时与可液化福建砂场地进行对比研究。结果表明:0.1g正弦波激励下,两种砂模型地基内各处超孔压比均远小于1,模型地基未发生液化;0.2g正弦波激励下,两种砂模型地基发生液化,珊瑚砂场地液化程度小于福建砂场地,液化后的珊瑚砂场地模型地基相比福建砂场地仍具有一定的剪切传递能力和刚度。0.1g和0.2g振动强度下珊瑚砂场地建筑物沉降、水平位移和立柱动弯矩相比福建砂场地较小。不同振动强度下桩基础出现动弯矩峰值的位置不同。

关键词: 珊瑚砂, 振动台试验, 群桩, 动力响应, 超孔隙水压力

Abstract: The dynamic field response to earthquake in the coral sand is affected by its special engineering properties. In order to reveal the seismic response characteristics of the pile-soil-superstructure in the coral sand site, the shaking table tests of pile groups with three-storey frame structure in coral sand under different earthquake intensities are carried out. The dynamic responses to soil and structure are analyzed and compared with those in the liquefied quartz sand of Fujian. The results show that the excess pore water pressure ratios in both coral and quartz sands are far less than 1 under 0.1g seismic intensity, demonstrating that no liquefaction occurs in both sites. However, both coral and quartz sands are liquefied under 0.2g seismic intensity, and the liquefaction degree of coral sand is less than that of quartz sand. Compared with the quartz sand site, the coral sand site still has some shear strength and stiffness after the liquefaction. The settlement, horizontal displacement and column bending moment of coral sand site under 0.1g and 0.2g seismic intensities are smaller than those of quartz sand site. The position of peak bending moment of pile foundation under different seismic intensities is not the same.

Key words: coral sand, shaking table test, pile group, dynamic response, excess pore water pressure

中图分类号: TU 47
[1] 谢宏丽, 周志军, 任玉波, 田叶青, 范经灿. 大直径预应力钢筋混凝土管桩群桩的水平承载性能[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2573-2585.
[2] 胡丰慧, 方祥位, 申春妮, 王春艳, 邵生俊, . 真三轴条件下珊瑚砂颗粒破碎、强度和剪胀性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2147-2159.
[3] 崔纪飞, 吴祯祯, 李林, 饶平平, . 考虑土体流变的新旧混合群桩变刚度调平研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1897-1906.
[4] 可文海, 杨文海, 李源, 吴磊, . SH波作用下斜坡地形中桩基的动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1545-1544.
[5] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[6] 周文强, 蒋良潍, 罗强, 肖卓琦, 罗義錬, 魏明, . 锚杆框架梁柔性外锚头减震性能振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1163-1173.
[7] 叶坤, 李兆军, 陈鹏飞, 李征, 丁杰, 廖立坚, . 桥梁桩基不对称直桩的计算与补桩施工应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1278-1285.
[8] 刘璐, 李帅学, 张鑫磊, 高洪梅, 王志华, 肖杨. 微生物加固珊瑚砂动剪切模量与阻尼比特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3410-3420.
[9] 秦悠, 龙慧, 吴琪, 庄海洋, 陈国兴. 复杂应力路径下饱和珊瑚砂孔压增长与刚度退化的阈值应变试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3441-3450.
[10] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[11] 蔡晓光, 徐洪路, 王海云, 李思汉, 李莹, .

土工格栅加筋土挡墙水平地震系数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3033-3044.

[12] 杨耀辉, 辛公锋, 陈育民, 李召峰, . 排水桩-网复合地基处置可液化路堤地基的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
[13] 马建勋, MOHAMMED El Hoseny, 庞盼望, 李文枭, 闫洪祥. 考虑土−结构相互作用的地下室层对高层建筑地震反应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2808-2822.
[14] 谢周州, 赵炼恒, 李亮, 黄栋梁, 张子健, 周靖, . 基于振动台试验的不同含石率土-石混合体边坡地震动响应差异性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2324-2337.
[15] 王新志, 黄鹏, 雷学文, 文东升, 丁浩桢, 刘铠诚, . 硫酸锌胶结珊瑚砂渗透特性试验及工程应用探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2094-2104.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!