岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 1836-1844.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1491

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

水平柔性拉筋式重力墙−坡体地震整体 稳定性分析方法

肖世国1, 2,刘航1,于昕左1   

  1. 1. 西南交通大学 地质工程系,四川 成都 610031;2. 西南交通大学 高速铁路线路工程教育部重点实验室,四川 成都 610031
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-28 修回日期:2019-11-22 出版日期:2020-06-11 发布日期:2020-07-31
  • 作者简介:肖世国,男,1973年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事边坡稳定性与支挡结构方面的研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51578466)。

Analysis method of seismic overall stability of soil slopes retained by gravity walls anchored horizontally with flexible reinforcements

XIAO Shi-guo1, 2, LIU Hang1, YU Xin-zuo1   

  1. 1. Department of Geological Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 2. Key Laboratory of High-speed Railway Engineering of Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
  • Received:2019-08-28 Revised:2019-11-22 Online:2020-06-11 Published:2020-07-31
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51578466).

摘要: 为合理分析水平柔性拉筋式重力墙?墙后坡体地震整体稳定性,考虑坡顶条形均布荷载作用以及拉筋拔出和拉断两种破坏模式,采用拟静力法与分区水平条分及斜条分极限平衡法,基于Fellenius法与简化Bishop法的条间力假定,推导了相应的墙?坡地震整体稳定系数计算公式,并通过数值模拟方法对不同水平地震影响系数的情况予以验证,且讨论了墙后填土与地基土的内摩擦角及黏聚力、筋带间距、长度及其极限拉力对墙?坡地震整体稳定性的影响特征。实例分析结果表明,简化Bishop法与数值模拟得到的墙?坡地震整体稳定系数较为接近,比Fellenius法的结果约高出6%;墙?坡地震整体稳定系数随填土及地基土抗剪强度参数的增大呈近似线性增大,随筋带拉力及顶层筋带长度在一定范围内的增加呈非线性增大,随筋带竖向间距的增大呈非线性减小;理论方法与数值模拟得到的潜在滑面也较为一致。

关键词: 水平柔性拉筋式重力墙, 墙?坡地震整体稳定性, 水平条分法, 拟静力法, 极限平衡

Abstract: In order to reasonably analyze seismic stability of filling slopes retained by gravity walls anchored horizontally with flexible reinforcements, the quasi-static method combined with the horizontally and obliquely slicing limit equilibrium methods are adopted to derive the safety factor of the wall-slope overall stability based on the hypothesis of interslice forces proposed by the Fellenius and the simplified Bishop methods. Considering the tensile rupture and the potential pulling out failure mechanism of the reinforcements, the proposed method is verified through numerical simulations under various horizontal seismic effect coefficients. Then the influences of the internal friction angle, the cohesion of the backfill and foundation soil, the vertical spacing, the ultimate tensile force, and the length of the reinforcements on the seismic wall-slope overall stability are studied, respectively. The results show that the safety factor calculated by the proposed method with the simplified Bishop’s hypothesis is fairly identical with the numerical results, which is about 6% higher than that calculated by the proposed method with the Fellenius hypothesis. Besides, the safety factor increases approximately linearly with the increase of shear strength of the filling and foundation soil, increases nonlinearly with the increase of the ultimate tensile force and the length of the top reinforcement, but decreases nonlinearly with the increase of the vertical spacing of the reinforcements. Additionally, potential slip surfaces of the retained slope by the proposed methods are close to the numerical results.

Key words: gravity walls anchored horizontally with flexible reinforcements, seismic wall-slope overall stability, horizontal slice method, quasi-static method, limit equilibrium

中图分类号: TU432
[1] 江沂键, 李焕焕, 朱大勇, 凌道盛, . 考虑推力线位置的边坡线性规划模型与极限平衡上下限解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1745-1754.
[2] 邓东平, 徐润冬, 彭一航, 文莎莎. 强度空间非均质性与各向异性特征下边坡稳定性极限平衡滑面应力法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 55-72.
[3] 邓东平, 杨春会, 谢志军, . 非线性M-C强度准则下预应力锚索加固边坡时效稳定性分析M-P法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1051-1066.
[4] 彭海游, 谢强, 陈柏林, 檀康, 王琦, 杨文君, . 基于极限平衡法的危岩倾覆稳定性三维计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 552-562.
[5] 易琪, 孙冠华, 姚院峰, 桂本, 商浩亮, 纪文栋, . 压缩空气储能地下内衬硐库上覆岩体稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3523-3532.
[6] 周志雄, 周凤玺, 曹小林, 汪镇, . 复合地基极限承载力的变分极限平衡法分析——竖向增强[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3748-3754.
[7] 邓东平, 彭一航, 柳梦琦, 李媛媛. 滑面极径-应力-强度耦合关联下非线性破坏特征边坡稳定性极限平衡分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3235-3258.
[8] 肖国峰. 改进的岩质凸块的超载储备极限平衡法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 425-432.
[9] 徐方, 张期树, 冷伍明, 邓志龙, 董俊利, 刘思慧, . 基于附加应力扩散效应的新型预应力路堤 稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 431-442.
[10] 陈柏吉, 肖世国, . 考虑条间剪力的刚性挡墙静力与 地震主动土压力水平条分法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(8): 2263-2276.
[11] 仉文岗, 王琦, 刘汉龙, 陈福勇, . 岩体空间变异性对隧道拱顶失效概率的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1462-1472.
[12] 章瑞环, 叶帅华, 陶晖. 基于改进极限平衡法的多级均质黄土边 坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 813-825.
[13] 张飞, 贾世林, 朱玉明, 陆晓义, 舒爽, . 台阶式加筋挡墙稳定所需加筋力计算方法 与影响规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(11): 3079-3089.
[14] 孙曦源, 衡朝阳, 周智, 张剑涛. 某超浅埋过街通道围岩压力的极限平衡求解方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 312-318.
[15] 刘杨, 刘维, 史培新, 赵宇, 王秒, . 超深地连墙成槽富水软弱层局部失稳理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 9-18.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!