岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (7): 1903-1910.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1957

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于对数动骨架的可考虑液化大变形本构

董青1,周正华1,苏杰1,李小军2,郝冰1   

  1. 1. 南京工业大学 交通运输工程学院,南京 210009;2. 北京工业大学 建筑工程学院,北京 100124
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-17 修回日期:2021-05-19 出版日期:2021-07-12 发布日期:2021-07-16
  • 作者简介:董青,女,1992年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土力学的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. U1839202);国家重点研发计划(No. 2017YFC1500400)

A constitutive model considering post-liquefaction deformation based on the logarithmic skeleton curve

DONG Qing1, ZHOU Zheng-hua1, SU Jie1, LI Xiao-jun2, HAO Bing1   

  1. 1. College of Transportation Science & Engineering, Nanjing Tech. University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China; 2. College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
  • Received:2019-11-17 Revised:2021-05-19 Online:2021-07-12 Published:2021-07-16
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1839202) and the National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (2017YFC1500400).

摘要: 可用于液化分析的本构模型在土层地震反应分析时难以模拟液化后引起的饱和砂土大变形反应,且适用于饱和砂土场地地震反应分析的非线性时域大变形本构的研究也相对较少。现针对饱和砂土液化大变形条件下的动力反应分析缺少相应的时域大变形本构开展研究,以期通过试验分析和理论研究提出一种可行的、简单适用的时域大变形本构。基于不排水循环三轴试验数据分析得到的饱和砂土液化后大变形应力?应变行为的规律,提出适用于饱和砂土液化后大变形的加卸载准则。结合笔者提出的基于对数动骨架曲线的有效应力本构,得到能定量描述饱和砂土液化大变形途径的大变形本构。该本构依据实际试验结果,可以系统地模拟饱和砂土整个液化过程的变形规律。通过自行编制的土层地震反应分析程序Soilresp1D,实现了含可液化饱和砂土场地动力反应分析,结果表明,基于对数动骨架本构、有效应力修正对数动骨架本构及液化大变形本构提出的时域非线性大变形本构能直接应用于含饱和砂土场地的动力反应分析。

关键词: 对数动骨架, 有效应力, 饱和砂土液化, 加卸载准则, 大变形本构

Abstract: Most of the constitutive model for liquefaction analysis cannot simulate the large post-liquefaction deformation of saturated sand, and there is little research on the nonlinear time-domain large deformation constitutive relationships suitable for seismic response analysis of saturated sand sites. In this paper, a feasible, simple and applicable large deformation constitutive model for time domain analysis is proposed through experimental analysis and theoretical research. The post-liquefaction stress-strain relationships of liquefied sand are obtained based on the undrained cyclic triaxial test data, then loading-reloading rules of large post-liquefaction deformation are proposed. Combined with the effective stress constitutive model based on logarithmic skeleton curve, a constitutive model that can quantitatively describe the large deformation of saturated sand liquefaction is proposed. According to the test results, the constitutive model can simulate small to large deformations from the pre-to post-liquefaction regime of sand. This constitutive model is also implemented to the program Soilresp1D for the dynamic response analysis of liquefiable soil sites. The results show that the time domain nonlinear large deformation unified constitutive model based on the logarithmic dynamic skeleton curve, effective stress-modified logarithmic dynamic skeleton constitutive model and liquefaction large deformation constitutive model can be directly applied to the dynamic response analysis of saturated sand.

Key words: logarithmic skeleton curve, effective stress, liquefaction of saturated sand, loading-unloading rules, large deformation constitutive model

中图分类号: TU 441
[1] 张天军, 田嘉伟, 张磊, 庞明坤, 潘红宇, 孟伟, 贺绥男, . 循环载荷下破碎煤体渗透率及迂曲度演化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1409-1418.
[2] 刘吉福. 排水固结堤坝稳定分析新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 106-114.
[3] 李永强, 许言, 陈波, 熊健辉, 卢玢宇, . 反压诱导有效应力增生模式与土体强度关联机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2338-2350.
[4] 张希栋, 董晓强, 段伟, 胡顺磊, 张豪儒, . 不排水循环荷载下纤维加固砂土的超孔压及流动液化特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 465-476.
[5] 陈博文, 李琦, 谭永胜, 余涛, 高文彬, 李霞颖, 申筛成, . 不同有效应力下泥岩盖层二氧化碳突破压力演化特征的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3681-3693.
[6] 王永光, 梁建文, 巴振宁, . 基于修正阻尼的土体非线性模型及其在Abaqus中的实现[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2287-2296.
[7] 朱锐, 周峰, 陈廷柱, 邓亚光, . 劲性复合桩挤土效应及承载力作用机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3577-3586.
[8] 牛庚, 朱晓凤, 李俊星, 吕梦缘, 安荔琪, 陈子晗, . 宽广吸力范围非饱和土剪切强度试验研究及其预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3349-3359.
[9] 黄茂松, 刘奕晖, 俞剑, 李弈杉, . 承压水地层基坑抗突涌稳定性的计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(11): 3071-3081.
[10] 曾立峰, 邵龙潭, 郭晓霞, . 土中有效应力概念的起源与发展[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 127-144.
[11] 田虎楠, 唐巨鹏, 潘一山, 余泓浩, . 平均有效应力对煤系页岩瓦斯微观吸附−解吸 特性影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 1803-1815.
[12] 杨洲, 程晓辉, 麻强, 刘伟, 谢庄子, . 高填方地基不排水稳定性分析强度指标研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 218-226.
[13] 涂园, 王奎华, 周建, 胡安峰, . 有效应力法和有效固结压力法在预压地基 强度计算中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 645-654.
[14] 方瑾瑾, 冯以鑫, 王立平, 余永强, . 真三轴条件下非饱和黄土的有效应力屈服特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 492-500.
[15] 吴爽爽, 胡新丽, 章涵, 周昌, 龚辉, . 嵌岩桩负摩阻力现场试验与计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3610-3617.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!