岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (11): 3730-3739.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0608

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

临江地下结构主被动联合抗浮方法及应用

骆冠勇1, 2,马铭骏1, 2,曹洪1, 2,潘泓1, 2   

  1. 1. 华南理工大学 土木与交通学院,广东 广州 510640;2. 华南理工大学 亚热带建筑科学国家重点实验室,广东 广州 510640
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-06 修回日期:2020-08-13 出版日期:2020-11-11 发布日期:2020-12-25
  • 通讯作者: 潘泓,男,1967年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: hpan@scut.edu.cn E-mail: luogy@scut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:骆冠勇,男,1979年生,博士(后),讲师,主要从事岩土方面的教学与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51978282);广东省自然科学基金项目(No. 2018A030313383,No. 2020A1515010583)

A new anti-float method for riverside underground structures: drainage corridor combined with uplift piles or uplift anchors

LUO Guan-yong1, 2, MA Ming-jun1, 2, CAO Hong1, 2, PAN Hong1, 2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510640, China; 2. The State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510640, China
  • Received:2020-05-06 Revised:2020-08-13 Online:2020-11-11 Published:2020-12-25
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51978282) and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2018A030313383, 2020A1515010583).

摘要: 临江场地的地下水位受外江水位影响,具有长期水位较低、短期汛期水位极高的特点。临江场地内的地下结构,若仅采用抗拔桩或抗拔锚杆等常规被动抗浮措施进行抗浮,将抗浮设防水位取为地表高程显然是偏危险的,但按50年一遇和100年一遇水位采用常规被动抗浮措施进行抗浮设计又显然是不经济的,成本极高。基于此,提出抗浮范畴临江结构的定义及其“排水廊道+常规抗浮措施”的主被动联合抗浮的方法。根据临江承压圆湖公式,考虑越流效应,给出了临江排水廊道简化计算分析方法并进行了有限元验证。临江地下结构利用排水廊道进行防洪渡汛,保证汛期地下结构水荷载稳定,消除汛期高水压对结构产生的极端水荷载,而对于平时非汛期水位的作用则利用常规抗浮措施进行考虑。廊道只在汛期高水位时起防洪渡汛作用,排水减压不会引起环境影响问题,同时其耐久性也容易保证。最后介绍利用此方法进行抗浮的实际工程。

关键词: 地下结构, 地下水, 抗浮, 渗流, 排水廊道

Abstract: The riverside groundwater level has a unique characteristic of low for long term working conditions but extremely high during flood seasons. This characteristic should be properly taken into account for designing a safe and economical anti-float scheme. For riverside underground structures, it will be dangerous when uplift piles or uplift anchors are adopted, taking the surface elevation as the anti-floating waterproof position. On the other hand, if uplift piles or uplift anchors are designed according to 50- or 100-years recurrence intervals, it is obviously uneconomical and the cost can be extremely high. Therefore, the definition of riverside underground structures and a new anti-float method on the combination of drainage corridors and uplift piles or anchors are proposed in this paper. Besides, considering the effect of leakage recharge, a simplified analytical approach of riverside drainage corridor based on circular pond formula is also put forward and verified by the finite element method. The drainage corridors are adopted to ensure the stability of water load on the underground structure and to eliminate the extreme water load caused by high water pressures during the flood season. In contrast, the conventional measures such as uplift anchors and piles will be adopted for anti-float during non-flood period. The drainage corridors only work during the flood season with high water levels, thus it will not cause environmental problems and its durability can also be easily guaranteed. In the end of this paper, an engineering application project adopting the proposed anti-float method is introduced.

Key words: underground structures, groundwater, anti-float, seepage, drainage corridor

中图分类号: O 357
[1] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[2] 王昕琪, 冯子军, 陈正男, 高祺, 阴伟涛, 靳佩桦, 李玉彬, . 超临界水作用下花岗岩裂隙渗流特性演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2847-2858.
[3] 靳贵晓, 林劭聪, 姜启武, 黄明, 李熹, . 基于Kozeny-Carman方程的酶诱导碳酸钙沉淀固化砂土的渗流数学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2376-2386.
[4] 吴兵, 盛建龙, 叶祖洋, 周新, . 单裂隙岩体非线性渗流-法向应力耦合模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2495-2504.
[5] 张海燕, 胡新丽, 李亚博. 周期性渗流-应力耦合下滑带土的蠕变特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2189-2198.
[6] 任旺, 苗君, 雷万钧, 王络, 陈益峰, . 混凝土坝坝基立体排水的数值模拟与优化设计[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2281-2295.
[7] 芮瑞, LIN A H, 杨俊超, 杨硕, . 被动活动门试验中的土拱效应演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1657-1666.
[8] 刘杰, 钟伦伟, 钟振, 张宪尚, 隆清明, 应鹏, . 恒定法向刚度边界条件下受剪岩石裂隙非线性渗流特性的数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1919-1933.
[9] 邓汉鑫, 武东生, 王晓光, 王东坡. 非均质孔隙介质中循环驱替对两相渗流及毛细捕获的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 505-514.
[10] 王浩, 侯泓冰, 江文豪, . 考虑根系对水文特性影响下非饱和植被土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3329-3345.
[11] 张仁君, 肖碧, 杨志兵, 郑小康, 胡冉, 陈益峰. 裂隙介质中毛细黏聚作用影响颗粒运移-堵塞机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3473-3484.
[12] 唐劲舟, 唐文豪, 杨科, 赵延林, 刘钦节, 段敏克, 谭哲, . 循环荷载作用下含倾斜单裂隙砂岩力学响应特征及渗流演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 199-212.
[13] 李永威, 徐林荣, 傅金阳, 商拥辉, . 列车荷载作用下铁路路基填料渗透破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 299-308.
[14] 韩枥兵, 李文涛, 韦昌富, . 自适应时间步长法在非饱和渗流中的应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 685-693.
[15] 薛秀丽, 谢伟睿, 廖欢, 曾超峰, 陈宏波, 徐长节, 韩磊, . 邻近深埋地铁车站水−土阻隔效应及其对基坑抽水致沉的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2786-2796.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!