岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (10): 2828-2840.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.2064

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑井阻时空变化的竖井地基非线性固结解析解

王洁1,李传勋1,郭霄2,卢萌盟3   

  1. 1. 江苏大学 土木工程与力学学院,江苏 镇江 212013;2. 浙江公路水运工程咨询有限责任公司,浙江 杭州 310006; 3. 中国矿业大学 力学与土木工程学院,江苏 徐州 221116
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-07 修回日期:2022-06-23 出版日期:2022-10-19 发布日期:2022-10-18
  • 通讯作者: 李传勋,男,1978年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程方面的教学和科研工作。E-mail: lichuanxun@yeah.net E-mail:1250820640@qq.com
  • 作者简介:王洁,女,1997年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩土工程方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51878320,No. 51878657)

Analytical solution for nonlinear consolidation of soft soil with vertical drains by considering time- and depth-variation of well resistance

WANG Jie1, LI Chuan-xun1, GUO Xiao2, LU Meng-meng3   

  1. 1. Faculty of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212013, China; 2. Zhejiang Highway and Waterage Engineering Consulting Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310006, China; 3. School of Mechanics & Civil Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China
  • Received:2021-12-07 Revised:2022-06-23 Online:2022-10-19 Published:2022-10-18
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51878320, 51878657).

摘要: 软土固结过程中展现出明显的非线性压缩和渗透特性,同时竖井的淤堵效应常导致井阻在固结过程中随深度和时间不断演化,但目前能考虑井阻随时空演化的竖井地基非线性固结解析解还很鲜见。通过引入孔隙比与有效应力及孔隙比与渗透系数间的半对数模型描述了土体的非线性固结特性,建立了能同时考虑井阻随时空变化和涂抹影响的竖井地基非线性固结模型,并采用分离变量法获得了固结模型的解析解。将特定参数下固结解的计算结果与实测数据、已有的竖井地基固结解答进行了对比分析以验证其可靠性。最后,对竖井地基的非线性固结性状开展了大量计算分析。结果表明:竖井渗透系数随深度线性衰减越明显则地基固结速率越慢;外荷载一定时,随着软土压缩指数cc与渗透率指数ck之比的增大,竖井地基固结速度减慢;在cc /ck值不变的情况下,外荷载增加,地基固结速率加快。在涂抹区的3种径向渗透系数变化模式中,抛物线变化模式下的地基固结速度最快,线性变化模式下的地基固结速度次之,恒定模式下的地基固结速度最慢,且这种性状并不因为考虑井阻变化或土体非线性固结特性而发生改变。

关键词: 竖井地基, 变井阻, 非线性固结, 涂抹, 解析解

Abstract: The soft soil usually exhibits obvious nonlinear compressibility and permeability characteristics during the consolidation process. At the same time, the clogging effect of vertical drains often causes the well resistance to change with depth and time during the consolidation process. However, the analytical solution for nonlinear consolidation of soils with vertical drain, in which the variation of well resistance over time and depth can be considered, is still rarely reported in the literature. In this study, semi-logarithmic models between the void ratio and the effective stress, and between the void ratio and the permeability coefficient are introduced to describe the nonlinear consolidation characteristics of soils, and a nonlinear consolidation model of soils with vertical drain, which can simultaneously consider the time- and depth-variation of well resistance and the influence of smearing, is developed, then the analytical solution of this consolidation model is obtained by the method of separated variables. The consolidation calculation results derived here under specific parameters are compared with the laboratory tests data, and the existing vertical drains consolidation solutions to verify its reliability. Finally, a large number of calculations and analyses have been carried out on the nonlinear consolidation behavior. The results show that the more obvious the linear decay of the vertical drain permeability coefficient with depth is, the slower the consolidation rate of soils with vertical drain is. Considering the exponential decrement of the vertical drain permeability coefficient with time, the consolidation rate of soils with vertical drain is much slower than that with consideration of the vertical drain permeability coefficient remaining constant over time. When the external load is constant, the consolidation rate of the vertical drain foundation decreases with the ratio of the soft soil compression index (cc) to the permeability index (ck) increases. When the value of cc/ck remains constant, the consolidation rate of the vertical drain foundation increases with the external load increases. Among the three variations related with horizontal permeability in smear zone, the vertical drain consolidation rate is the fastest under the parabolic variation mode, the next is the linear variation mode, and the vertical drain consolidation rate under the constant variation mode is the slowest. The influences of smear zone on consolidation behavior are not affected by the change of well resistance and the nonlinear consolidation characteristics of soils.

Key words: vertical drain, variable well resistance, nonlinear consolidation, smearing, analytical solution

中图分类号: TU 447
[1] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[2] 周航, 汪义圣, 亓戈平, . 黏弹性土中异形桩横向动力响应半解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 761-774.
[3] 王浩, 侯泓冰, 江文豪, . 考虑根系对水文特性影响下非饱和植被土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3329-3345.
[4] 张智卿, 刘鑫, 刘开富, 吴君涛, 吴文兵, . 横观各向同性土体中端承桩水平振动特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3371-3382.
[5] 孙锦鑫, 卢萌盟, 刘干斌, . 高置换率散体材料桩-不透水桩组合型复合地基非线性固结解析研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2421-2436.
[6] 江学辉, 颜建伟, 罗文俊, 李佳宝, 徐长节. 纵向压力和加固钢板对隧道力学性能影响的解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1623-1632.
[7] 王亦炀, 李传勋, 李阔, 陆向综. 竖井地基大应变非线性固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1446-1456.
[8] 刘景锦, 罗学思, 雷华阳, 郑刚, 罗昊鹏, . 等应变条件下增压式真空预压固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 809-821.
[9] 高柳, 吕述晖, 王奎华, . 缺陷桩-梁系统的动力特性应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 3095-3104.
[10] 张玉国, 杨文兵, 赵雅纯, 王闯, 赵亚敏. 双向渗流下考虑应力时空效应的组合桩复合地基固结理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 184-196.
[11] 余俊, 李东凯, 和振, 张志中. 带有两端防渗墙坝基的各向异性渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2381-2388.
[12] 黄娟, 和振, 余俊, 杨鑫歆. 渗透各向异性圆形围堰稳态渗流场解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1035-1043.
[13] 郑长杰, 崔亦秦, 吴琛, 罗通, 栾鲁宝, . 竖向入射S波作用下单桩水平地震响应简化解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 327-336.
[14] 余俊, 张志中, 郑靖凡, 和振. 水位波动条件下有封底基坑渗流场孔压解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3415-3423.
[15] 余俊, 张扬, 郑靖凡, 张志中. 考虑潜水面的基坑二维稳态渗流场解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(11): 3109-3116.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!