岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (8): 2238-2248.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1306

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于耗散能量的饱和黄土动孔压模型

简涛1, 2,孔令伟1, 2,柏巍1, 2,舒荣军1, 2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点试验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-22 接受日期:2022-11-24 出版日期:2023-08-21 发布日期:2023-08-21
  • 通讯作者: 孔令伟,男,1967年生,博士,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事特殊土的力学特性与灾害防治技术方面的研究。E-main: lwkong@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:focusjian@126.com
  • 作者简介:简涛,男,1993年生,博士研究生,主要从事特殊土的力学特性研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(No. 2018YFC1505304);国家自然科学基金项目(No. 41772339,No. 41877281)

Dynamic pore pressure model for saturated loess based on dissipative energy

JIAN Tao1, 2, KONG Ling-wei1, 2, BAI Wei1, 2, SHU Rong-jun1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2022-08-22 Accepted:2022-11-24 Online:2023-08-21 Published:2023-08-21
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC1505304) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41772339, 41877281)

摘要: 通过一系列不排水动三轴试验探究了饱和黄土振动液化过程中孔隙水压力和累积耗散能量的演化模式,并讨论了围压、动应力幅值和固结应力比对其演化过程的影响。结果表明:饱和黄土的孔隙水压力和耗散能量随着循环荷载作用逐渐累积。固结围压抑制孔隙水压力增长而消耗更多能量;更大的动应力幅值使得孔隙水压力增长更快而消耗能量更少;等压固结下,孔隙水压力增长至围压从而触发初始液化,而偏压固结下,通常先达到振动液化应变标准而孔隙水压力并没有增长至围压水平,并且固结应力比越大,液化时孔隙水压力越小,消耗能量也更少。归一化孔隙水压力 u/σ0 与累积耗散能量W/Wf之间关系受围压、循环应力比和固结应力比影响较小,可统一用双曲线模型表示。

关键词: 饱和黄土, 振动液化, 孔隙水压力, 累积耗散能量

Abstract: A series of undrained dynamic triaxial tests is carried out to investigate the evolution patterns of pore water and accumulative dissipated energy during the vibration-induced liquefaction of saturated loess, and the effects of confining pressure, dynamic stress amplitude and consolidation stress ratio on them are discussed. The results show that the pore water pressure and dissipated energy of saturated loess gradually build-up with the increase of cyclic loading times during vibration-induced liquefaction. The consolidation confining pressure inhibits the increase of pore water pressure and consumes more energy. Larger dynamic stress amplitude leads to faster increase in pore water pressure and less energy consumption. Under the isotropic consolidation, the increase of pore water pressure causes the effective stress to be 0, thus triggering the initial liquefaction. However, under anisotropic consolidation, the specimen usually reaches the strain criterion for liquefaction first, while the pore water pressure does not increase to the confining pressure level, and the larger consolidation stress ratio leads to the lower pore water pressure and less cumulative dissipated energy during liquefaction. The pore water pressure is closely related to the cumulative dissipated energy, and normalized pore water pressure u/σ0 and the cumulative dissipated energy W/Wf are less influenced by the confining pressure, dynamic stress amplitude and consolidation stress ratio and can be expressed uniformly in a hyperbolic model

Key words: saturated loess, vibration-induced liquefaction, pore water pressure, cumulative dissipated energy

中图分类号: TU 444
[1] 董林, 陈强, 夏坤, 李彦苍, 李燕, 王晓磊. 细粒土黏性对液化与循环软化特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 228-237.
[2] 张淼, 李林, 郑瀚波, 李盼盼, . 考虑饱和度影响的结构性黄土弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2816-2824.
[3] 倪睿思, 肖世国, 吴兵, 梁瑶, . 基于非线性井阻的饱和软弱土无砂增压式真空预压分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2160-2172.
[4] 亢佳伟, 邓国华, 李开超, 王丽琴, . 基于原位浸水试验的黄土软化力学行为研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1851-1864.
[5] 杨校辉, 赵子毅, 郭楠, 钱豹, 朱彦鹏, . 横观各向同性非饱和黄土蠕变特性及沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1489-1500.
[6] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[7] 常仕奇, 董晓强, 刘晓凤, 李江山, 刘晓勇, 张豪儒, 黄寅豪, . 水位变动引发干法赤泥堆场坝体失稳的模型试验与数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1122-1130.
[8] 宋丽, 许领, 李杭州, 李伟, . 考虑中间主应力影响的非饱和黄土边坡抗滑桩间距研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 517-524.
[9] 王彪, 陈星欣, 尹清锋, 郭力群, 何明高, . 软土地层盾构地中对接法孔压扰动规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 535-549.
[10] 亢佳伟, 邓国华, 康佐, . 基于旁压试验的饱和黄土强度分类评价方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 557-567.
[11] 杨耀辉, 辛公锋, 陈育民, 李召峰, . 排水桩-网复合地基处置可液化路堤地基的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
[12] 谢森林, 胡安峰, 肖志荣, 汪美慧, 胡训健, 陈俞超, . 基于广义Voigt模型的半渗透边界隧道周围饱和软土固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2024-2036.
[13] 金丹丹, 鲁先东, 王炳辉, 施展, 张雷, . 冲击荷载下含夹层饱和砂土孔压变化规律分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1081-1091.
[14] 刘德仁, 张转军, 王旭, 张艳丰, 安政山, 金芯, . 水蒸汽增湿重塑非饱和黄土地基现场应用参数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 73-82.
[15] 李尧, 李嘉评. 复杂初始应力状态下松砂多向循环单剪特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2555-2565.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!