岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3): 788-796.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0493

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

竖向和水平组合荷载下能量桩单桩变形特性

蒋济泽1,王成龙1, 2, 3,黄煜镔1,赵华1,陈志雄1   

  1. 1. 重庆大学 土木工程学院,重庆 400045;2. 大足石刻研究院,重庆 402360;3. 重庆市地质矿产勘查开发局,重庆 401121
  • 收稿日期:2023-04-20 接受日期:2023-12-03 出版日期:2024-03-11 发布日期:2024-03-20
  • 通讯作者: 王成龙,男,1989年生,博士,副教授,主要从事能源地下结构、桩?土相互作用方面的科研工作研究。E-mail: wangchlong586@163.com
  • 作者简介:蒋济泽,男,2000年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩土工程方面的科研工作。E-mail: jjz2332s@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52278396);中国博士后科学基金(No.2022M720591);重庆市博士后研究项目特别资助(No.2022CQBSHTB3006)。

Deformation characteristics for single energy pile under combined loads in vertical and horizontal directions

JIANG Ji-ze1, WANG Cheng-long1, 2, 3, HUANG Yu-bin1, ZHAO Hua1, CHEN Zhi-xiong1   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 2. Academy of Dazu Rock Carvings, Chongqing 402360, China; 3. Chongqing Bureau of Geology and Minerals Exploration, Chongqing 401121, China
  • Received:2023-04-20 Accepted:2023-12-03 Online:2024-03-11 Published:2024-03-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (52278396), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2022M720591) and Special Foundation of Postdoctoral Support Program, Chongqing (2022CQBSHTB3006).

摘要: 能量桩作为一种新型能源地下结构,在承受上部建筑荷载同时,能够获取浅层地热能。目前针对水平荷载与竖向荷载共同作用下的能量桩热力学特性的研究较少,而水平荷载与竖向荷载共同作用下,桩身温度变化会引起桩体弯矩、水平和竖向位移等发生变化。基于模型试验,对桩体施加10次冷热循环,开展了竖向和水平组合荷载下能量桩的变形特性研究。结果表明,组合荷载下冷热循环会进一步增大桩身弯矩,且对桩体中部的影响更大,最大桩身弯矩增幅达到了117%;冷热循环会产生桩顶累积位移,试验桩竖向位移增加了0.201 mm,温度作用引起的水平位移增加值达到了1.46% D(D为桩体直径);同时,冷热循环会导致桩向桩前倾斜,10次冷热循环后转角达到1.88×10−3 rad,且会随着循环次数增加有缓慢增加趋势;加热时桩前土压力减小,而制冷时使桩前土压力增大。

关键词: 能量桩, 组合荷载, 模型试验, 冷热循环, 热力学特性

Abstract: Energy piles, as innovative energy underground structure, serve the dual purpose of shallow extracting geothermal energy while bearing the upper building load. There are few studies on the thermomechanical properties of energy piles under combined horizontal and vertical loads. The temperature change of pile body under combined horizontal and vertical loads will result in variations in pile bending moment, horizontal and vertical displacement, etc. This paper investigated the deformation characteristics of energy piles under combined vertical and horizontal loads through model tests with 10 heating-cooling cycles applied to the piles. The results showed that the heating-cooling cycles under combined load led to further increase in the pile bending moment, particularly affecting the middle section of the pile, with the maximum increase in pile bending moment reaching 117%. Additionally, the heating-cooling cycles caused cumulative displacement at the top of the pile. The vertical displacement of the test pile increased by 0.201 mm, and the increase in horizontal displacement due to the thermal cycles reached 1.46% D (D is the diameter of the pile). Simultaneously, the heating-cooling cycles induced a forward tilt of the pile, with the tilt angle reached 1.88×10−3 rad after 10 heating-cooling cycles and gradually increasing with the number of thermal cycles. Moreover, the soil pressure in front of the pile decreased during heating, while increased during cooling.

Key words: energy pile, combined load, model test, heating-cooling cycles, thermo-mechanical behavior

中图分类号: TU473.1
[1] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[2] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[3] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[4] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[5] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[6] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[7] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[8] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[9] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[10] 常洪林, 孔纲强, 王福慧, 王成龙, 周杨, . 褥垫层作用下预应力高强混凝土能量桩热力响应特性现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1240-1251.
[11] 裴媛媛, 龙建辉, 郭师苡, 安成纪, 翁杭雨, 张吉宁, . 不同荷载作用下折角式加筋土挡墙应力-应变特征模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[12] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[13] 王兵, 胡小波, 孔楠楠. 真空联合电渗加固超细颗粒疏浚土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
[14] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[15] 陈怀林, 杨涛, 饶云康, 张哲, 吴红刚, 谢江伟, 滕汉卿. 基于分段式滑面应力测试系统的滑面应力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3562-3573.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!