岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4): 1181-1189.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0581

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于离散单元法的渗流侵蚀作用下桩基位移与承载特性研究

张冬梅1, 2,张学亮1, 2,杜伟伟3   

  1. 1.同济大学 地下建筑与工程系,上海200092;2.同济大学 岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海200092; 3.常州市城乡建设工程管理中心,江苏 常州213000
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-10 接受日期:2023-07-11 出版日期:2024-04-17 发布日期:2024-04-18
  • 作者简介:张冬梅,女,1976年,博士,教授,主要从事隧道结构安全及施工环境影响方面的研究。E-mail: dmzhang@tongji.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52238010);上海市教委创新项目(No.2019-01-07-00-07-456 E00051);上海市科委资助项目(No. 21DZ1200601, No. 20DZ1201404)

Discrete element method based investigation on displacement and bearing characteristics of pile foundation under seepage erosion

ZHANG Dong-mei1, 2, ZHANG Xue-liang1, 2, DU Wei-wei3   

  1. 1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 3. Changzhou Urban-Rural Construction Engineering Management Center, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213000, China
  • Received:2023-05-10 Accepted:2023-07-11 Online:2024-04-17 Published:2024-04-18
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52238010), the Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (2019-01-07-00-07-456 E00051) the and Shanghai Science and Technology Committee Program (21DZ1200601, 20DZ1201404).

摘要: 随着城市地下空间桩基与隧道立体交叉分布体系的日渐复杂,隧道渗流侵蚀引发的桩基稳定性问题越发突出。然而,目前关于隧道破损引发渗流侵蚀方面的研究工作主要聚焦于侵蚀发生机制方面,其与邻近桩基的相互作用尚欠关注。因此,在物理试验揭示渗流侵蚀机制的基础上,通过建立土体临界细粒含量表达式,量化表征了地层侵蚀形态;随后,采用随机定量删除细颗粒的方法,基于离散单元法DEM建立了多区域侵蚀地层模型,进而分析了不同桩基位置、沉桩方式、桩基荷载和基础类型条件下桩基结构的侵蚀响应特征。结果表明,桩基受侵蚀后均产生不同程度的下沉位移,并在不平衡力的驱动下向侵蚀区倾斜;桩端阻力受损后随桩体下沉逐渐上升,侧摩阻力损失则基本无法恢复。此外,不同沉桩方式与桩基荷载下,桩体的位移与阻力变化模式基本一致,主要是变化量的不同;相比单桩,群桩具有更好的抗侵蚀能力。

关键词: 模型试验, 离散单元法, 侵蚀地层模型, 影响因素, 桩基响应

Abstract: With the increasing complexity of the three-dimensional cross-distribution system of pile foundations and tunnels in the urban underground space, the stability of the pile foundation caused by tunnel seepage erosion becomes more and more prominent. However, the current research mainly focuses on the mechanism of erosion induced by defective tunnels, and little on its interaction with the adjacent pile foundation. Thereby, based on the seepage erosion mechanism revealed by the physical model test, the erosion-induced stratum form is quantitatively characterized by establishing the critical fine particle content expression. Subsequently, a multi-zone eroded strata model is simulated by the random and quantitative removal of fine particles in the DEM domain, and then the erosion response characteristics of the foundation under different positions, loads, sinking methods and types are analyzed. The results show that the pile foundation has different degrees of subsidence under different erosion conditions, and tilts to the eroded area under the drive of unbalance force on its eroded position. After the erosion-induced reduction, the pile-tip resistance increases gradually with the subsidence, but the loss of lateral frictional resistance is basically unrecoverable. In addition, the changing mode of displacement and resistance of the pile is basically the same under different sinking methods and loads, only different in the changed amount. Compared with the single pile, pile group foundation has a better erosion resistance.

Key words: model test, discrete element method, eroded strata model, influential factors, pile foundation response

中图分类号: TU 454
[1] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[2] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[3] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[4] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[5] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[6] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[7] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[8] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[9] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[10] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[11] 裴媛媛, 龙建辉, 郭师苡, 安成纪, 翁杭雨, 张吉宁, . 不同荷载作用下折角式加筋土挡墙应力-应变特征模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[12] 王兵, 胡小波, 孔楠楠. 真空联合电渗加固超细颗粒疏浚土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
[13] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[14] 陈怀林, 杨涛, 饶云康, 张哲, 吴红刚, 谢江伟, 滕汉卿. 基于分段式滑面应力测试系统的滑面应力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3562-3573.
[15] 王辉, 钮新强, 马刚, 周伟, . 干湿循环作用下堆石料宏细观力学特性的离散元模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 665-676.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!