岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (S1): 178-186.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1019

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

排水桩-网复合地基处置可液化路堤地基的振动台试验研究

杨耀辉1,辛公锋1,陈育民2, 3,李召峰4   

  1. 1. 山东高速集团有限公司创新研究院,山东 济南 250014;2. 河海大学 岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室,江苏 南京 210098; 3. 河海大学 土木与交通学院,江苏 南京 210098;4. 山东大学 齐鲁交通学院,山东 济南 250002
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-13 接受日期:2023-08-14 出版日期:2024-09-18 发布日期:2024-09-19
  • 通讯作者: 陈育民,男,1981年生,博士,教授,主要从事土动力学与岩土地震工程相关的教学科研工作。E-mail: ymchenhhu@163.com
  • 作者简介:杨耀辉,男,1990年生,博士,高级工程师,主要从事地基处理方面的研究。E-mail: yangyaohui1905@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金重点项目(No.41831282);国家自然科学基金面上项目(No.51879090)

Shaking table test on drainage pile-net composite foundation treated liquefiable subgrade

YANG Yao-hui1, XIN Gong-feng1, CHEN Yu-min2, 3, LI Zhao-feng4   

  1. 1. Shandong Hi-Speed Group Innovation Research Institute, Jinan, Shandong 250014, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 3. College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 4. School of Qilu Transportation, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250002, China
  • Received:2023-07-13 Accepted:2023-08-14 Online:2024-09-18 Published:2024-09-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41831282) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51879090).

摘要: 排水刚性桩融合了刚性桩基础承载力高和具有排水性能的双重优点。为研究排水刚性桩处置可液化路堤地基的抗液化作用效果,采用7#硅砂作为路堤地基模型材料,3×5群桩布置形式,在水平向和竖直向施加双向动力荷载,对排水桩−网复合地基和普通桩−网复合地基处理可液化路堤地基开展了振动台模型试验研究。从超孔隙水压力、加速度、沉降等动力响应对排水桩−网复合地基的抗液化作用效果进行了分析。试验结果表明:排水桩−网复合地基的处置效果明显优于普通桩−网复合地基的加固效果。排水桩工况超孔压比峰值最大值为0.79,最小值为0.61,普通桩工况超孔压比峰值均达到1.0,处于完全液化状态。排水桩工况水平向峰值加速度放大系数沿路堤模型底部至顶部呈现明显的放大效应,峰值加速度放大系数最大值为1.60。普通桩工况峰值加速度放大系数呈现一定的液化地基减震效应,峰值加速度放大系数最大值为1.07。排水桩工况沉降平均值为11.4 mm。普通桩工况沉降平均值为25.7 mm,排水桩工况最终沉降量平均值较普通桩工况减小55.6%。排水桩能够有效加快超孔隙水压力的消散,减小路堤沉降量,是一种处置可液化地基的有效措施。

关键词: 排水刚性桩, 桩-网复合地基, 可液化地基, 振动台试验, 超孔隙水压力, 竖向沉降

Abstract: Rigid drainage piles combine the dual advantages of high bearing capacity and drainage performance. To investigate the anti-liquefaction effectiveness of rigid drainage piles in treating liquefiable subgrade, #7 silica sand was employed as the material for modeling the liquefiable subgrade. A shaking table model test was conducted to compare the performance of a drainage pile-net composite foundation with an ordinary pile-net composite foundation, utilizing a 3×5 pile group configuration and applying bidirectional dynamic loads both horizontally and vertically. The anti-liquefaction effect of the drainage pile-net composite foundation was analyzed based on dynamic responses, including excess pore water pressure, acceleration, and settlement. Experimental results indicate that the drainage pile-net composite foundation significantly outperforms the ordinary pile-net composite foundation. Specifically, the peak excess pore pressure ratio in the drainage pile condition ranges from 0.61 to 0.79, whereas it reaches 1.0 in the ordinary pile condition, indicating complete liquefaction. In the drainage pile condition, the horizontal peak acceleration amplification coefficient increases significantly from the bottom to the top of the embankment model, with a maximum amplification coefficient of 1.60. Conversely, in the ordinary pile condition, the peak acceleration amplification coefficient demonstrates a certain seismic damping effect in liquefied ground, reaching a maximum value of 1.07. The average settlement in the drainage pile condition is 11.4 mm, whereas it is 25.7 mm in the ordinary pile condition, representing a 55.6% reduction in the final settlement. These findings suggest that drainage piles effectively accelerate the dissipation of excess pore water pressure and reduce embankment settlement, making them an effective measure for treating liquefiable foundations.

Key words: rigid-drainage pile, pile-net composite foundation, liquefiable subgrade, shaking table test, excess pore water pressure, vertical settlement

中图分类号: TU473.1
[1] 周文强, 蒋良潍, 罗强, 肖卓琦, 罗義錬, 魏明, . 锚杆框架梁柔性外锚头减震性能振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1163-1173.
[2] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[3] 蔡晓光, 徐洪路, 王海云, 李思汉, 李莹, .

土工格栅加筋土挡墙水平地震系数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3033-3044.

[4] 马建勋, MOHAMMED El Hoseny, 庞盼望, 李文枭, 闫洪祥. 考虑土−结构相互作用的地下室层对高层建筑地震反应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2808-2822.
[5] 谢周州, 赵炼恒, 李亮, 黄栋梁, 张子健, 周靖, . 基于振动台试验的不同含石率土-石混合体边坡地震动响应差异性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2324-2337.
[6] 谢森林, 胡安峰, 肖志荣, 汪美慧, 胡训健, 陈俞超, . 基于广义Voigt模型的半渗透边界隧道周围饱和软土固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2024-2036.
[7] 何梓雷, 蒋关鲁, 冯海洲, 潘申鑫, 何晓龙, 李杰, . 地震作用下桩板墙-锚索组合支护基覆型边坡的动力响应特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2011-2023.
[8] 李福秀, 郭文灏, 郑烨炜. 刚性墙面双面加筋土挡墙动力响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1957-1966.
[9] 朱丹, 蒋关鲁, 陈虹羽, 赵鑫辉, 黄德贵, 刘乙甫, . 单、双排桩支护路堑边坡动力响应特性的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1763-1777.
[10] 何梓雷, 蒋关鲁, 冯海洲, 陈虹羽, 郭玉丰, 何晓龙, 李杰, . 基于变形的降雨后地震基覆型边坡劣化特性与机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1789-1802.
[11] 陶志刚, 丰于翔, 赵易, 张晓宇, 何满潮, 雷啸天, . 穿断层隧道NPR锚索支护体系抗震特性振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 939-949.
[12] 金丹丹, 鲁先东, 王炳辉, 施展, 张雷, . 冲击荷载下含夹层饱和砂土孔压变化规律分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1081-1091.
[13] 王通, 刘先峰, 袁胜洋, 蒋关鲁, 胡金山, 邵珠杰, 田士军, . 顺倾及反倾层状碎裂结构斜坡地震反应的大型振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 489-501.
[14] 张聪, 冯忠居, 林路宇, 周桂梅, 陈露, . 震陷场地变截面单桩动力特性与损伤评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 3037-3046.
[15] 冯海洲, 蒋关鲁, 何梓雷, 郭玉丰, 胡金山, 李杰, 袁胜洋, . 预应力锚索桩板墙加固隧道洞口边坡的动力响应特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 50-62.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!