岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 1521-1533.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0937CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.0937

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

单轴压缩下水泥注浆煤岩力学性能及损伤特征研究

都海龙1, 2, 3,金爱兵1, 2,秦文静1, 2,商瑞豪1, 2,王传江4,马赛5   

  1. 1. 北京科技大学 金属矿山高效开采与安全教育部重点实验室,北京 100083;2. 北京科技大学 土木与资源工程学院,北京 100083; 3. 晋能控股装备制造集团有限公司,山西 晋城 048000;4. 晋能控股装备制造集团有限公司寺河煤矿,山西 晋城 048205; 5. 山西晋煤集团技术研究院有限责任公司,山西 晋城 048000
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-29 接受日期:2024-11-11 出版日期:2025-05-06 发布日期:2025-05-07
  • 通讯作者: 金爱兵,男,1974年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩石力学、边坡稳定性方面的研究工作。E-mail: jinaibing@ustb.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:都海龙,男,博士研究生,主要从事注浆材料、煤岩损伤方面的研究工作。E-mail: 1191622981@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 52174106)

Mechanical properties and damage characteristics of cement grouted coal and rock under uniaxial compression

DU Hai-long1, 2, 3, JIN Ai-bing1, 2, QIN Wen-jing1, 2, SHANG Rui-hao1, 2, WANG Chuang-jiang4, MA Sai5   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Efficient Mining and Safety of Metal Mine, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China; 2. School of Civil and Resources Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China; 3. Jinneng Holdings Equipment Manufacturing Group Co., Ltd., Jincheng, Shanxi 048000, China; 4. Sihe Coal Mine, Jinneng Holdings Equipment Manufacturing Group Co., Ltd., Jincheng, Shanxi 048205, China; 5. Shanxi Jinmei Group Technology Research Institute Co., Ltd., Jincheng, Shanxi 048000, China
  • Received:2024-07-29 Accepted:2024-11-11 Online:2025-05-06 Published:2025-05-07
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52174106).

摘要: 注浆是提高软破围岩强度、维护工程稳定的有效方法和常用手段。为评价注浆对煤岩力学性能及破裂损伤的影响,对超细水泥注浆前后煤岩开展单轴压缩试验,同时采用数字图像相关技术和声发射技术监测煤岩损伤演化和裂纹扩展,基于断裂力学理论讨论煤岩裂隙尖端注浆扩展过程。研究结果表明:(1)相对完整煤样,注浆后煤样强度整体呈增强态势;当煤样原生裂隙较多时,由于裂隙尖端应力集中效应,注浆后导致强度降低;(2)注浆后煤样内部孔隙被浆液充填,脆性减弱,塑性和抵抗变形能力增强,但注浆对煤岩峰后变形影响较小;(3)完整煤样破坏表现为单条高应变集中带贯通,由于注浆导致煤样力学性能各向同性增强,故注浆后煤样破坏过程应变无明显集中带,应变演化较无序;(4)提出以水平位移损伤因子Dw表征单轴荷载下煤体损伤演化程度,定义水平位移损伤变量,建立了单轴受压煤样损伤分段本构模型。

关键词: 注浆加固, 裂纹扩展, 损伤因子, 本构模型

Abstract: Grouting is a widely used and effective method to enhance the strength of soft, fractured surrounding rock and maintain engineering stability. In order to evaluate the impacts of grouting on mechanical properties and fracture damage of coal and rock, uniaxial compression tests were conducted on samples before and after ultrafine cement grouting. Digital image correlation and acoustic emission technologies were employed to monitor damage evolution and crack growth in coal and rock. The process of crack tip grouting expansion was discussed using fracture mechanics theory. The results show that: 1) Compared to intact coal samples, the strength increase post-grouting. Coal samples with more cracks exhibit lower strength, potentially due to stress concentration at crack tips. 2) Post-grouting, internal pores in the coal sample are filled, reducing brittleness and enhancing plasticity and deformation resistance. However, grouting minimally affects post-peak deformation, and the cementation between grout and coal is suboptimal. 3) The failure of intact coal samples primarily exhibits a single high-strain concentrated zone. In grouted coal samples, grouting enhances the isotropic of the mechanical properties failure lacks a in distinct strain concentrated zone, and strain evolution is relatively disordered. 4) The horizontal displacement damage factor Dw is proposed to characterize the damage evolution degree of coal under uniaxial load, the horizontal displacement damage variable is defined, and the damage piecewise constitutive model for uniaxial compression coal sample is established.

Key words: grouting reinforcement, crack propagation, damage factor, constitutive model

中图分类号: TD 325
[1] 侯克鹏, 江帆, 张超, 龚晶汉, . 土石混合体−基岩接触面剪切的基覆面形态效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 271-284.
[2] 赵凯, 马洪岭, 施锡林, 李银平, 杨春和, . 基于蠕变疲劳本构模型的压气蓄能盐穴长期稳定性评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 1-12.
[3] 刘一鸣, 李振, 冯国瑞, 杨鹏, 白锦文, 黄炳雄, 李东, . 循环加卸载下裂隙砂岩声−热响应特征及前兆规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2773-2791.
[4] 屈俊童, 时启壮, 郭颖杰, 张 翔, 刘 熠, 蒋德阳. 冻融循环作用下冰碛土力学特性及损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2859-2872.
[5] 李满, 辛昊哲, 刘先珊, 张帆, 胡大伟, 杨福见, . 基于修正相场模型的岩体混合模式破裂数值研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2600-2612.
[6] 马鹏飞, 张艺晨, 袁超, 徐茂洲, 郭小雄, . 软弱层岩体间隔破裂现象的近场动力学方法模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2296-2307.
[7] 杨爱武, 程姝晓, 梁振振, 华谦谦, 杨少朋. 高含水率吹填土大变形固结与流变叠加效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1977-1987.
[8] 王桂林, 王力, 王润秋, 任甲山, . 干湿循环后贯通型锯齿状红砂岩节理面剪切本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 706-720.
[9] 张春顺, 林正鸿, 杨典森, 陈嘉瑞, . 考虑初始级配影响的粗粒土非线性弹性模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 750-760.
[10] 武孝天, 姚仰平, 魏然, 崔文杰. 基于统一硬化模型的隧道施工引发土体变形数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 1013-1024.
[11] 周建, 廖星川, 刘福深, 尚肖楠, 沈君逸, . 应用卷积近场动力学快速模拟随机裂纹扩展[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 625-639.
[12] 耿潇威, 陈成, 孙中华, 黎伟, 王勇, 徐梦冰, 余颂, . 基于广义位势理论的考虑组构各向异性的砂土本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3175-3186.
[13] 王帅, 王豫徽, 王玲, 李佳祺, 赵梓皓, 庞凯旋, . 基于晶体模型的岩石孔隙结构与矿物组成对裂纹扩展影响机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3289-3301.
[14] 杨科, 于祥, 何祥, 侯永强, 张连富, . 不同含水状态矸石胶结充填体能量演化与损伤特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 26-42.
[15] 王番, 郅彬, 刘恩龙, 王小婵, 邓博团, 李金华, 张辉, . 考虑局部胶结破损热力学行为的结构性黄土二元介质本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 97-109.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!