岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 624-634.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0581

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

承压水上开采倾斜底板破坏特征 与突水危险性分析

宋文成1, 2,梁正召1, 2   

  1. 1. 大连理工大学 海岸和近海工程国家重点实验室,辽宁 大连 116024;2. 大连理工大学 岩石破裂与失稳研究中心,辽宁 大连 116024
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-27 修回日期:2019-05-17 出版日期:2020-02-11 发布日期:2020-02-12
  • 通讯作者: 梁正召,男,1977年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩石破裂力学模拟方面的研究。E-mail:LiangZZ@dlut.edu.cn E-mail:dgswc@mail.dlut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:宋文成,男,1990年生,博士研究生,主要从事矿井防治水方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51779031);国家重点研发计划(No. 2016YFB0201000)。

Investigation on failure characteristics and water inrush risk of inclined floor mining above confined aquifer

SONG Wen-cheng1, 2, LIANG Zheng-zhao1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning 116024, China; 2. Center of Rock Instability and Seismicity Research, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning 116024, China
  • Received:2019-03-27 Revised:2019-05-17 Online:2020-02-11 Published:2020-02-12
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51779031) and the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFB0201000).

摘要: 我国煤炭资源的开采受水害威胁严重。为了研究承压水上煤层开采倾斜底板破坏特征,分析底板突水危险性,基于FLAC3D软件模拟研究倾斜底板开采破坏形态和突水通道形成过程,利用双端封堵测漏装置进行底板深度破坏特征原位测试,并建立倾斜底板隔水关键层理论力学模型,探讨采空区岩石垮落、重新压实和非均匀分布承压水等协同作用对倾斜隔水关键层稳定性的影响。研究表明:(1)采后倾斜底板形成明显的三带破坏特征,塑性破坏区的分布非对称性特征明显,沿工作面走向底板近似勺形破坏形态,沿工作面倾向具有上小下大的倒马鞍形剪切破坏特征,且数值模拟的最大破坏深度为16.71 m,与现场实测倾斜底板法向的破坏深度15.49 m大致相当;(2)理论计算倾斜底板隔水关键层的预先破坏并不是发生在其边界中部,而是分别从经过最大挠度点的曲线与右侧边界、下端部边界的法向相交处起裂,并沿边界相互贯通,逐渐扩展至整个隔水层内部区域;(3)计算得到倾斜隔水关键层的易突水部位分别为A、B和C且突水危险性R(B)>R(A)>R(C),这与模拟得到的倾斜底板突水通道的形成部位和数量、形成顺序及突水危险程度均较吻合。该研究成果可为带压开采下倾斜底板突水的评价及安全治理提供一定的理论指导和参考。

关键词: 采矿工程, 倾斜底板, 破坏特征, 突水危险性, 理论分析

Abstract: The exploitation of coal resources in China is seriously threatened by water hazards. A coupled hydromechanical modeling of mining above a confined aquifer with FLAC3D was carried out to numerically investigate the fractured behavior of inclined floor and water outburst risk. Based on the double-end plugging leak detection device, the in-situ testing of mining-induced damage depth was implemented. Furthermore, the mechanical model of inclined water-resisting key strata was constructed to theoretically calculate the stability of inclined floor under the synergistic action of the roof caving rock mass, floor mining-disturbed rock mass and non-uniformly distributed confined aquifer. Results show that obvious three-zone failure characteristics in an asymmetric state are formed in the inclined floor after excavation. The mining failure zones along the strike and inclination are approximately spoon-shaped and upper small and lower large inverted saddle-shaped, respectively, and the maximum failure depth of numerical simulation with 16.71 m is approximately equivalent to the measured result of 15.49 m. The theoretical calculation shows that the pre-failures of inclined water-resisting key strata are not located in the middle of its boundary, but occur near the normal intersection points between the curves passing through the maximum deflection position and the right or lower boundary. The pre-failure areas may intersect with each other along the boundary, and gradually extend to the whole inner region of the aquifer. The water inrush location and risk of inclined water-resisting key strata calculated by the theoretical model are in good agreement with that of numerical simulation. The research results in this paper can provide some theoretical guidance and reference for the evaluation and safety control of floor water inrush under mining with pressure.

Key words: mining engineering, inclined floor strata, fractured characteristics, risk of water outburst, theoretical analysis

中图分类号: TD 32
[1] 赵飞, 石振明, 俞松波, 周圆媛, 李博, 陈建峰, 张清照, 郑鸿超. 层状岩质边坡动力失稳及加固研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3585-3614.
[2] 蒋剑青, 罗敏华, 胡诗红, 柳志灏, . 断续节理产状对砂岩破坏特征影响的真三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3077-3092.
[3] 孙杰豪, 郭保华, 田世轩, 程坦, . 基于声发射特征参数的砂岩节理直剪破坏特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 167-177.
[4] 董恒年, 孔纲强, 周杨, 杨庆, . 考虑系泊点深度的单点系泊系统锚桩水平承载性能理论分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1356-1364.
[5] 范浩, 王磊, 王连国, . 不同应力路径下层理煤体力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 385-395.
[6] 任建东, 赵毅鑫, 孙中博, 王文, 刘世民. 气煤叠置区埋地管道的保护煤柱优化设计及多参量演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2679-2695.
[7] 姬楠, 吴祥云, 任辉启, 翟超辰, 张跃飞, 赵荣国, 聂晓东, . 岩石中平面装药爆炸作用下不同高跨比结构抗爆性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2276-2286.
[8] 张平, 任松, 张闯, 吴斐, 隆能增, 李凯鑫, . 循环扰动和高温作用下砂岩的岩爆倾向性及破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 771-783.
[9] 郭佳奇, 程立攀, 朱斌忠, 田永超, 黄鑫. 持续开挖效应下结构面剪切力学性质与能量特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 131-143.
[10] 屈永龙, 杨更社, 奚家米, 何晖, 丁潇, 张猛, . 低温−加载作用下白垩系砂岩的变形 破坏特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2431-2442.
[11] 刘新喜, 李玉, 范子坚, 李盛南, 王玮玮, 董蓬, . 干湿循环作用下单裂隙炭质页岩能量演化与 破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 1761-1771.
[12] 周泽华, 吕艳, 苏生瑞, 刁钰恒, 王祚鹏, 王剑昆, 赵辉, . 花岗岩质边坡地震动力响应及破坏特征 大型振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 918-931.
[13] 朱永建, 任恒, 王平, 李鹏, 王希之, 魏明星, . 含单一贯通破裂面岩石注浆试验及加固机制分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(12): 3221-3230.
[14] 高欢, 翟越, 汪铁楠, 李宇白, 王铭, 李艳, . 主动围压作用下混凝土-花岗岩组合体抗压力学 特性与强度预测模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11): 2983-2992.
[15] 杨 科, 刘文杰, 马衍坤, 许日杰, 池小楼, . 真三轴单面临空下煤岩组合体冲击 破坏特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 15-27.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!