岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3): 755-764.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0214

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于离心模型试验的库岸滑坡变形特征研究

汤明高,李松林,许 强,龚正峰,祝 权,魏 勇   

  1. 成都理工大学 地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室,四川 成都 610059
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-28 修回日期:2019-08-02 出版日期:2020-03-11 发布日期:2020-05-25
  • 通讯作者: 李松林,男,1990年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土体稳定性方面的研究工作。E-mail: lsl68@foxmail.com E-mail: tomyr2008@163.com
  • 作者简介:汤明高,男,1978年生,博士,教授,主要从事地质灾害预测评价及防治处理方面的教学与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No.41977255);三峡后续工作地质灾害防治研究课题(No.000121 2015C C60 005);四川省应用基础研究重点项目(No.2019YJ0403)

Study of deformation characteristics of reservoir landslide based on centrifugal model test

TANG Ming-gao, LI Song-lin, XU Qiang, GONG Zheng-feng, ZHU Quan, WEI Yong   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China
  • Received:2019-01-28 Revised:2019-08-02 Online:2020-03-11 Published:2020-05-25
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41977255), the Geological Hazard Prevention Project of Three Gorges (000121 2015C C60 005) and the Sichuan Science and Technology Program(2019YJ0403).

摘要: 三峡库区蓄水后,大量库岸滑坡发生复活变形,为研究滑坡随库水位升降的变形特征和机制,以库区典型直线形滑面形态滑坡为地质原型,概化设计了大尺度离心模型试验,通过模拟两个水位升降过程,布设高速相机和传感器,获取了滑坡变形演化全过程高清影像、孔压和土压?时间变化曲线,可得以下研究结果:在水位首次下降时,孔压和土压逐渐减小,当下降15 min后滑坡发生整体蠕滑变形,首先是前部产生横向张拉裂缝,中后部则是以竖直位移为主的蠕滑压密变形过程,水位停止下降2 min后变形停止,表明变形对库水位变化具有一定滞后性;当水位再次下降时,前部沿原破裂面再次下滑并失稳,中后部则无变形,变形演化具有典型牵引式特征。在库水首次入渗滑坡时,坡体孔隙水压力对库水位升降具有明显的滞后性,而在下一次水位升降过程中,这种滞后性明显减弱。该类滑坡受水位下降的动水压力效应影响较大,在滑坡变形过程中,中后部滑体变形在竖直方向的蠕滑压密行为使得中后部稳定性有所提高,因此,在后期蓄水过程中不再发生变形,试验现象与实际库岸滑坡吻合。试验揭示了三峡库区该类滑坡在水位升降条件下的变形破坏模式及长期演化趋势,为库区地灾防治提供了参考依据。

关键词: 三峡库区, 库岸滑坡, 离心模型试验, 水位升降, 变形演化

Abstract: Many landslides along the bank have reactivated after the impoundment in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area (TGRA). In order to study the landslide deformation characteristic subjected to fluctuation of reservoir water level, a large-scale centrifuge test model was designed based on typical landslide with rectilinear sliding surface in TGRA. The deformation images, the curves of pore water pressure (PWP) and earth pressure (EP) vs. time were obtained by high-speed cameras and pore water pressure and soil pressure sensors during the modelling of two cycles of reservoir fluctuation. The results could be summarized as follows: in the initial stage of the water level drawdown, the PWP and EP gradually decreased. When the water level fell for 15 minutes, the frontal body pull apart and down, the middle and rear parts of the landslide had a creep movement and compaction process dominated by vertical displacement, and the deformation stopped two minutes after the water level stopped falling. When the reservoir drawdown again, the frontal part slid along the original fracture zone, and no obvious deformation occurred in the middle or rear parts. In addition, when the reservoir water infiltrated into the landslide for the first time, the PWP in the slope lag behind the water level obviously, whereas the lag effect had diminished during the next time. The landslide is greatly affected by the hydrodynamic pressure of reservoir drawdown and its deformation has a retrogressive characteristic. The creep compaction behavior improved the stability of the middle and rear parts of the landslide gradually. Therefore, no deformation occurred during the water storage later, and the experimental phenomena coincide with the deformation characteristics of actual reservoir landslide. It reveals the deformation mode and evolution trend of the landslide in TGRA subjected to reservoir fluctuation, which provides a basis for the geohazard prevention.

Key words: Three Gorges Reservoir, reservoir landslide, centrifugal model test, reservoir fluctuation, landslide evolution

中图分类号: TU434
[1] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[2] 孟佳佳, 吴益平, 晏鄂川, 汪洋. 基于荷载-干湿循环耦合试验的三峡库区石龙门滑坡滑带土强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1511-1520.
[3] 熊根, 付栋康, 朱斌, 赖莹, . 软黏土中吸力锚承载特性离心试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1472-1480.
[4] 陈磊, 张强, 贾朝军, 雷明锋, 黄娟, 胡晶, . 强降雨对库岸堆积体边坡稳定性影响的离心模型试验和数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1423-1434.
[5] 孙钱程, 徐晓, 刘圣, 徐志华, 何钰铭, 郭浩森, 张国栋, . 三峡库区碎屑岩岸坡岩体钻孔成像特征及质量评价方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 581-592.
[6] 张院生, 雷云超, 强小俊, 吴东东, 王东坡, 王计华, . 多排微型桩框架结构加固边坡离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1983-1994.
[7] 彭文明, 张雪东, 夏勇, . 软弱覆盖层上土石坝动力离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1771-1778.
[8] 冷先伦, 王川, 盛谦, 宋文军, 陈健, 张占荣, 陈菲, . 基于透明相似模型试验的主控裂隙边坡变形破坏演化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1283-1294.
[9] 王力, 南芳芸, 王世梅, 陈勇, 李小伟, 范志宏, 陈玙珊, . 三峡库区降雨型滑坡入渗特征及变形机制——基于一维和二维模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1363-1374.
[10] 朱涛, 尹翔, 王成汤, 闵弘, 王浩, 陈娱, 何俊霖, . 西昌太和矿北采场滑坡变形演化规律 及成因机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 392-400.
[11] 罗维平, 袁大军, 金大龙, 陆平, 陈健, 郭海鹏, . 富水砂层盾构开挖面支护压力与地层变形关系 离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 345-354.
[12] 闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 胡雷, . 三峡库区顺层灰岩岸坡劣化−溃屈灾变机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2568-2580.
[13] 兰景岩, 蔡金豆, 吴连斌, 史庆旗, . 含隧道场地地震动放大效应的深度变化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(8): 2083-2091.
[14] 黄波林, 殷跃平, 李滨, 白林丰, 秦臻, . 柱状危岩体坐落式崩塌产生涌浪的 简化数值模型与校验[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2269-2278.
[15] 肖捷夫, 李云安, 胡勇, 张申, 蔡浚明, . 库水涨落和降雨条件下古滑坡变形特征 模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 471-480.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!