岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5): 1670-1679.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0519

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于多态模糊贝叶斯网络的地铁车站 深基坑坍塌可能性评价

王成汤1, 2,王浩1,覃卫民1,钟国强3,陈舞1, 2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049; 3. 山东省交通规划设计院,山东 济南 250031
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-14 修回日期:2019-09-09 出版日期:2020-05-11 发布日期:2020-07-07
  • 通讯作者: 王浩,男,1972年生,博士,研究员,主要从事岩土工程监测、数据建模、风险分析和相关软件开发方面的研究工作。 E-mail: hwang@ whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:1004808156@qq.com
  • 作者简介:王成汤,男,1992年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土力学与工程方面的研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 41672314, No. 41472288);国家重点研发计划(No. 2017YFC1501304)。

Evaluation of collapse possibility of deep foundation pits in metro stations based on multi-state fuzzy Bayesian networks

WANG Cheng-tang1, 2, WANG Hao1, QIN Wei-min1, ZHONG Guo-qiang3, CHEN Wu1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. Shandong Provincial Communication Planning and Design Institute, Jinan, Shandong 250031, China
  • Received:2019-03-14 Revised:2019-09-09 Online:2020-05-11 Published:2020-07-07
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41672314, 41472288) and the Key R & D Program of China (2017YFC1501304).

摘要: 针对地铁车站深基坑施工风险因素多、坍塌事故多发,且传统方法在多态性以及精确概率难以获取的复杂系统风险分析方面存在一定的局限性,提出了一种基于多态模糊贝叶斯网络的深基坑坍塌可能性评价方法。该方法根据建立的风险分析故障树来构建多态贝叶斯网络模型;利用模糊数描述根节点的故障状态和发生概率,克服了不能考虑事件中间故障状态对系统的影响以及精确概率难以获取的问题。基于贝叶斯网络正向推理实现了用根节点的模糊概率和施工中实际故障状态两种不同的方式计算基坑坍塌风险发生的概率,从而可以实现基坑施工过程中的实时动态风险分析,而且可以根据敏感性分析结果辨识关键致险因子以指导风险控制工作,同时可以通过反向推理获得各根节点的后验概率以进行故障诊断及进一步预测系统状态。实例分析表明:该方法能够科学、合理地评价基坑坍塌风险并确定关键致险因子,可作为基坑施工安全风险管理的决策工具。

关键词: 车站, 深基坑, 模糊贝叶斯网络, 多态系统, 坍塌可能性, 模糊失效率

Abstract: Many construction risk factors and frequent collapse accidents are associated with deep foundation pits in metro stations, and there are limitations for the traditional methods to conduct risk analysis of such complex systems with multiple states. In this study, a method for evaluation of collapse possibility of deep foundation pit collapse based on multi-state fuzzy Bayesian network is proposed. The multi-state Bayesian network model was constructed via fault tree transformation, and fuzzy numbers were used to describe the fault state and the failure rate of root nodes, which overcomes the problem that the traditional methods cannot consider the influence of intermediate fault states and are difficult to obtain the accurate failure rate. Based on the forward reasoning of Bayesian network, the risk probability of foundation pit collapse can be calculated in two different ways including the fuzzy probability of root nodes and the actual fault state in construction. As a result, a real-time dynamic risk analysis during foundation pit construction can be achieved. Furthermore, the key risk factors can be identified for the guidance of risk control according to the sensitivity analysis results. In addition, the posterior probability of each root node can be obtained by backward reasoning to carry out fault diagnosis and further predict the system state. Two case studies show that the proposed method can scientifically and reasonably evaluate the collapse risk of foundation pit and determine the key risk factors, which can be used as a decision-making tool for safety risk management of foundation pit construction.

Key words: metro station, deep foundation pit, fuzzy Bayesian networks, multi-state system, collapse possibility, fuzzy failure rate

中图分类号: TU 470
[1] 肖荣军, 马威, 李锋, 袁丽云. 一种深基坑排桩支护结构内力位移矩阵分析法 解答及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 579-595.
[2] 魏星, 陈睿, 程世涛, 朱明, 王子健, . 成都膨胀土地区深基坑降雨稳定性分析与变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 525-534.
[3] 李涛, 舒佳军, 王彦龙, 陈前. 基于模态分解方法的深基坑支护桩水平变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 496-506.
[4] THENDAR Yoshua, LIM Aswin. 考虑地下连续墙接缝的深基坑RFD系统研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3717-3727.
[5] 陈保国, 贾曾潘. 近接建筑荷载作用下阳角型深基坑最佳支撑位置[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2400-2408.
[6] HANIFAH Hermil Rizki, RAHARDJO Paulus Pramono, LIM Aswin. 砂土地层圆形深基坑三维分析与测斜仪测量[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1142-1152.
[7] 李瑛, 刘岸军, 刘兴旺. 考虑假想基础宽度的基坑抗隆起稳定性[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 2843-2850.
[8] 莫品强, 刘尧, 黄子丰, 滕鸿博, 陈斌, 陶祥令, . 复杂支护条件下深基坑支护桩−冠梁−支撑 的变形协调及空间效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2592-2601.
[9] 安军海, 陶连金, 蒋录珍, . 盾构扩挖地铁车站结构地震反应特性振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1277-1288.
[10] 兰韡, 王卫东, 常林越, . 超大规模深基坑工程现场抽水试验及土层 变形规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(10): 2898-2910.
[11] 邱滟佳, 张鸿儒, 于仲洋. 受周边地上建筑影响地铁车站的抗震设计方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1443-1452.
[12] 陈保国, 闫腾飞, 王程鹏, 宗秋雷, . 深基坑地连墙支护体系协调变形规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(10): 3289-3299.
[13] 陈舞, 张国华, 王浩, 钟国强, 王成汤, . 基于T-S模糊故障树的钻爆法施工隧道 坍塌可能性评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 319-328.
[14] 谷淡平, 凌同华, . 悬臂式型钢水泥土搅拌墙的水泥土 承载比和墙顶位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1957-1965.
[15] 刘念武, 陈奕天, 龚晓南, 俞济涛, . 软土深开挖致地铁车站基坑及 邻近建筑变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1515-1525.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!