岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7): 2313-2323.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1507

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

膨胀土湿干胀缩裂隙演化及其定量分析

骆赵刚1,汪时机1, 2,杨振北1   

  1. 1. 西南大学 工程技术学院,重庆 400715;2. 长江师范学院 土木建筑工程学院,重庆 408100
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-02 修回日期:2019-12-30 出版日期:2020-07-10 发布日期:2020-09-13
  • 作者简介:骆赵刚,男,1996年生,硕士研究生,主要从事土体裂隙量化表征方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.11572262,No.11972311);中央高校基本业务费专项资金(No.XDJK2018AB003)。

Quantitative analysis of fracture evolution of expansive soils under wetting-drying cycles

LUO Zhao-gang1, WANG Shi-ji1, 2, YANG Zhen-bei1   

  1. 1. College of Engineering and Technology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China; 2. School of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Yangtze Normal University, Chongqing 408100, China
  • Received:2019-09-02 Revised:2019-12-30 Online:2020-07-10 Published:2020-09-13
  • Contact: 汪时机,男,1977年生,博士,教授/博士生导师,主要从事岩土力学方面的研究与教学。E-mail: shjwang@swu.edu.cn E-mail:1769897044@qq.com
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11572262, 11972311) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (XDJK2018AB003).

摘要: 膨胀土是一种分布广泛且具有明显胀缩性的裂隙土,其裂纹萌生及裂隙扩展会受到诸多因素的影响。此试验利用基于MATLAB开发的图像处理与裂隙定量分析程序,研究了膨胀土裂隙开展的尺寸和温度效应。制备25个不同初始状态的膨胀土泥浆试样,利用拍照台对其失水收缩过程中试样表面裂隙演化过程以及对应含水率进行记录。运用裂隙定量分析程序,分别对两类效应单独作用、耦合作用下的膨胀土裂隙度 、长径比C、裂隙平均宽度 、分形维数值等指标进行定量化分析发现:膨胀土裂隙的分形维数值具有较好的稳定性,其指标仅受试样厚度轻微影响,分形维数与含水率ω的关系呈近似对数曲线;在失水收缩过程中膨胀土最终裂隙指标主要受到试样厚度的影响,表面尺寸对裂隙长径比、宽度最终值也有一定影响,温度影响主要体现在促使裂隙更早、更快的发育并稳定,对最终指标影响相对不明显,影响显著性顺序为:厚度>表面尺寸>温度;此外还对膨胀土失水收缩开裂过程机制进行分析,进一步研究膨胀土的裂隙发育以及两类效应对其裂隙扩展的影响规律。

关键词: 膨胀土, 裂隙, 尺寸效应, 温度效应, 定量表征

Abstract: Expansive soil is a widely distributed soil with obvious dilatancy, shrinkage and crack-rich properties. Its crack initiation and propagation are affected by many factors. In this study, the image processing and crack quantitative analysis program developed by MATLAB were used to explore the size and temperature effects of the crack evolution of expansive soil samples. Firstly, twenty-five expansive soil mud samples with different initial states were prepared. Then, the evolution of cracks on the surface and the corresponding water content of the samples during the shrinkage due to water loss were recorded using a designed camera system. Finally, using crack quantitative analysis program, some indexes including fracture degree, aspect ratio, average crack width and fractal dimension, were quantitatively analyzed under the size effect or temperature effect, and the size-temperature combined action, respectively. It is shown that the fractal dimension value of the crack remains stable, and is only slightly affected by the thickness of the samples. But there exists an approximate logarithmic relationship between the fractal dimension and the moisture content. In the process of water loss and shrinkage, the final fracture index of the expansive soil was mainly affected by the thickness of the sample, and the surface size also had a certain impact on the final value of the fracture length to diameter ratio and width. Temperature accelerates fracture development and stability. However, the impact of average width value and temperature on the final index was not obvious. The thickness was the most significant factor, followed by the surface size, and finally temperature. Additionally, the microcosmic mechanism of shrinkage and cracking process of expansive soil were also analyzed according to this experiment.

Key words: expansive soil, fracture, size effect, temperature effect, quantitative characterization

中图分类号: TU 411
[1] 李槟, 申海萌, 李琦, 李霞颖, . 不同围压条件下花岗岩剪切过程渗透率动态演化规律数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 437-453.
[2] 苗日成, 唐贝, 祁飞, 江志安, 崔溦, . 随机裂隙岩体滚刀破岩过程离散元模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 541-552.
[3] 吴子龙, 俞韬, 闫超, 邓永锋, 胡广青, 高宇航, 王璋, 王力, . 陕西黄土重金属污染分析与黄土/膨润土隔离墙处治初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2738-2748.
[4] 刘一鸣, 李振, 冯国瑞, 杨鹏, 白锦文, 黄炳雄, 李东, . 循环加卸载下裂隙砂岩声−热响应特征及前兆规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2773-2791.
[5] 王昕琪, 冯子军, 陈正男, 高祺, 阴伟涛, 靳佩桦, 李玉彬, . 超临界水作用下花岗岩裂隙渗流特性演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2847-2858.
[6] 王邺, 王述红, 张泽, 韩博文, 杨润生, . 裂隙及水幕影响下的水封洞库油品运移范围研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2907-2928.
[7] 孙闯, 蒲云波, 敖云鹤, 陶琦, . 冻融饱水裂隙砂岩力学特性及细观破裂演化特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2339-2352.
[8] 王炳文, 刘臣毅, 康明超, 李乾龙, 杨雷, 周森林, 钱垒. 考虑应力的非闭合裂隙岩体损伤机制及裂纹扩展研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2409-2420.
[9] 高帅, 任富强, 常远. 预制单裂隙砂岩注浆过程中的浆液流动特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2505-2515.
[10] 熊飞, 刘新荣, 刘文武, 钟祖良, 杨忠平, 王南云, 王浩, 薛熠, . 含深大裂隙陡崖式岩溶山体采动破坏与失稳机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2516-2531.
[11] 雷瑞德, 顾清恒, 胡超, 贺培, 周林森, . 裂隙砂岩声发射信号特征及破裂前兆识别研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2023-2038.
[12] 姜海波, 卢燕, 李琳, 张军, . 干湿-冻融作用输水渠道膨胀土强度特性及损伤演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1356-1367.
[13] 欧阳淼, 张红日, 王桂尧, 邓人睿, 郭鸥, 汪磊, 高游, . 基于响应面法的生物基质改良膨胀土配比优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1368-1378.
[14] 郑舒文, 刘松玉, 李迪, 童立元, 吴恺, . 膨胀土基泡沫轻质土力学性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1455-1465.
[15] 申林方, 华涛, 王志良, 李松波, 陈骞. 参数空间变异性对岩石水力压裂裂隙扩展形态的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1294-1302.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!