岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7): 2411-2421.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.2145

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

流量对水力压裂破裂压力和增压率的影响研究

邵长跃1, 2,潘鹏志1, 2,赵德才3,姚天波3,苗书婷1, 2,郁培阳1, 2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049; 3. 贵州水利投资(集团)有限责任公司,贵州 贵阳 550081
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-22 修回日期:2020-05-06 出版日期:2020-07-10 发布日期:2020-09-20
  • 通讯作者: 潘鹏志,男,1976年生,博士,研究员,主要从事裂隙岩体变形破坏机理与连续?非连续数值方法方面的研究工作。E-mail: pzpan@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:550760111@qq.com
  • 作者简介:邵长跃,男,1995年生,硕士研究生,主要从事水力压裂方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(No.2017YFC0804203)。

Effect of pumping rate on hydraulic fracturing breakdown pressure and pressurization rate

SHAO Chang-yue1, 2, PAN Peng-zhi1, 2, ZHAO De-cai3, YAO Tian-bo3, MIAO Shu-ting1, 2, YU Pei-yang1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. Guizhou Water Conservancy Investment Group CO.LTD, Guiyang, Guizhou 550081, China
  • Received:2019-12-22 Revised:2020-05-06 Online:2020-07-10 Published:2020-09-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFC0804203).

摘要:

水力压裂现场原位测试试验的破裂压力是计算构造地应力的重要参数。为了探究流量对水力压裂破裂压力和增压率的影响,设计4种不同恒定流量情况的低渗透硬脆灰岩室内大型水力压裂试验,结合声发射监测技术分析不同流量下水力裂缝破裂压力、破坏模式和缝网复杂程度的规律以及流量与增压率的内在关系。试验结果表明:流量越大,破裂压力越高,缝网复杂程度越低;典型压力?时间曲线分为缓慢增压段、急速增压段、稳定增压段和突然下降段;稳定增压段增压率保持不变,压力随时间线性增长,其增压率的大小和流量存在明显的线性关系;基于流量与稳定增压段增压率的线性关系,考虑流量因素的Ito理论可以很好地定量解释流量对破裂压力的影响,试验结果与理论预测吻合度较高。

关键词: 水力压裂, 流量, 增压率, 破裂压力, 低渗透硬脆岩石

Abstract: The breakdown pressure of the pressure-time curve obtained from the in-situ test is an important parameter for calculating the tectonic stress. In order to investigate the influence of pumping rate on breakdown pressure and pressurization rate, four large-scale hydraulic fracturing experiments on low-permeability hard and brittle limestone with varying constant pumping rate were conducted. Acoustic emission monitoring technique was used to investigate how varying pumping rate affected breakdown pressure, failure mode and complexity of fracture network as well as internal relationship between pumping rate and pressurization rate. The experimental results show that the pumping rate has a significant effect on the breakdown pressure. A larger pumping rate results in a higher breakdown pressure and a lower complexity of fracture network. The typical pressure-time curve consists of a slow boosting stage, a rapid boosting stage, a stable boosting stage and a sudden drop stage. Pressure increases linearly with time during the stable boosting stage, and there is a clear linear relationship between the pressurization rate and the pumping rate. Using the linear relationship between the pumping rate and the steady-state pressurization rate, the Ito theory can quantitatively explain the dependence of the breakdown pressure on the pumping rate. The theoretical predictions are in good agreement with the experimental results.

Key words: hydraulic fracturing, pumping rate, pressurization rate, breakdown pressure, low permeability hard and brittle rock

中图分类号: TU 452
[1] 唐梅荣, 张广清, 张敏, . 多水平井立体化水力压裂缝网空间分布特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2449-2458.
[2] 王刚, 王恩茂, 隆清明, 徐浩, 陈雪畅, 刘昆轮, . 考虑滤失效应的煤层水力压裂与裂隙扩展关系研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1071-1083.
[3] 申林方, 华涛, 王志良, 李松波, 陈骞. 参数空间变异性对岩石水力压裂裂隙扩展形态的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1294-1302.
[4] 刘少华, 夏才初, 徐英俊, 徐晨, . 高内气压作用下岩石破裂特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3431-3440.
[5] 刘宇鹏, 常鑫, 杨春和, 郭印同, 侯振坤, 李双明, 贾长贵, . 走滑应力特征下川南深层页岩高温真三轴压裂物理模拟试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3104-3116.
[6] 陈骞, 王志良, 申林方, 华涛, 李邵军, 徐则民, . 基于热力耦合的近场动力学方法高温岩石水力压裂数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2502-2514.
[7] 吕茂淋, 朱珍德, 周露明, 葛鑫梁, . 基于相场法的预制双裂隙岩体水力压裂扩展数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1850-1862.
[8] 华涛, 申林方, 王志良, 李泽, 徐则民. 基于近场动力学的岩石水力压裂数值模拟及裂隙网络定量分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 612-622.
[9] 余俊, 郑靖凡, 杨鑫歆, 李东凯. 土压平衡盾构渗流场解析解及喷涌判别研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 572-580.
[10] 余俊, 李东凯, 和振, 张志中. 带有两端防渗墙坝基的各向异性渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2381-2388.
[11] 甘磊, 刘玉, 张宗亮, 沈振中, 马洪影, . 岩体裂隙粗糙度表征及其对裂隙渗流特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1585-1592.
[12] 李炯, 李明广, 詹红兵, 陈锦剑, 夏小和, 张硕. 井周堵塞对承压含水层定流量回灌渗流场影响的半解析研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 2871-2878.
[13] 陈磊, 张广清, 张敏, 曹庾杰, 谌立吉, . 水力裂缝穿越非连续面扩展时的断裂过程研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 159-170.
[14] 周培尧, 潘丽燕, 陈华生, 王斌, 邹志坤, 张敏, . 薄互层水力裂缝垂向扩展控制因素试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 299-306.
[15] 周中, 陈云, 刘撞撞. 泥水盾构泥水仓泥浆压力控制模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 286-292.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!