岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (8): 2746-2755.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.2026

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

大直径后压浆灌注桩承载力和沉降的 实用计算方法研究

万志辉1, 2,戴国亮1, 2,高鲁超1, 2,龚维明1, 2   

  1. 1. 东南大学 混凝土及预应力混凝土结构教育部重点实验室,江苏 南京 211189; 2. 东南大学 土木工程学院,江苏 南京 211189
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-01 修回日期:2020-05-05 出版日期:2020-08-14 发布日期:2020-10-18
  • 作者简介:万志辉,男,1990年生,博士,助理研究员,主要从事后压浆理论与工程实践、桩基础与深基础工程等方面的科研工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51678145,No. 51878160);国家重点研发计划专项(No. 2017YFC0703408);江苏省六大人才高峰项目(No. XNY-047)。

A practical method of calculation of bearing capacity and settlement of large-diameter post-grouting piles

WAN Zhi-hui1, 2, DAI Guo-liang1, 2, GAO Lu-chao1, 2, GONG Wei-ming1, 2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structures of the Ministry of Education, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211189, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211189, China
  • Received:2019-12-01 Revised:2020-05-05 Online:2020-08-14 Published:2020-10-18
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51678145, 51878160), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFC0703408) and the Six Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province (XNY-047).

摘要: 基于收集的139个工程中的716根试桩静载试验数据,对大直径后压浆桩承载力和沉降的实用计算方法进行研究,在统计分析的基础上给出了以土层为分类的侧摩阻力及端阻力增强系数,建立了适用于不同压浆类型的大直径后压浆桩承载力实用计算方法,并且通过大量的实测数据验证了该方法的可靠性。为了考虑后压浆对大直径桩基础沉降控制的影响,在未经压浆的大直径桩基础沉降计算方法的基础上引入了后压浆沉降影响系数,基于统计分析给出了后压浆沉降影响系数的建议取值范围,提出了一种适用于不同土层的大直径后压浆桩沉降计算经验预估方法,最后通过工程实例验证了该方法的适用性。该研究成果纳入了中华人民共和国行业标准《公路桥涵地基与基础设计规范》(JTJ3363-2019)及工程建设行业标准《公路桥梁灌注桩后压浆技术规程》(T/CECS G: D67-01-2018),可为后压浆技术的广泛应用起到推动作用。

关键词: 大直径后压浆桩, 竖向承载力, 增强系数, 统计分析, 沉降计算, 后压浆沉降影响系数

Abstract: Based on the static load test data of 716 test piles collected from 139 projects, the practical calculation method of bearing capacity and settlement of large-diameter post-grouted piles was studied. The improvement coefficients of the side friction and base resistance of soil layer were given primarily based on statistics analysis, and the practical calculation approach for the bearing capacity of large-diameter post-grouted piles applicable to different grouting types was presented. The reliability of the proposed approach was verified by a large number of measured data. Moreover, the influence coefficient of post-grouting settlement was introduced based on the settlement calculation method of large-diameter pile foundation without grouting. Based on the statistical analysis, the recommended range of influence coefficient of post-grouting settlement was given, and an empirical estimation method for calculating settlement of large-diameter post-grouted piles suitable for different soil layers was proposed. Finally, the applicability of the proposed method was verified using engineering examples. The research results have been incorporated into the industry standard of the People's Republic of China Code for design of ground base and foundation of highway bridges and culverts (JTJ 3363-2019) and the industry standard of national project construction Technical specification for post-grouting of cast-in-place pile of highway bridges (T/CECS G: D67-01-2018), which can promote the wide application of post-grouting technique.

Key words: large-diameter post-grouted pile, bearing capacity, improvement coefficient, statistical analysis, settlement calculation, influence coefficient of post-grouting settlement

中图分类号: TU 473
[1] 鲍树峰, 董志良, 莫海鸿, 张劲文, 于立婷, 刘攀, 刘晓强, 侯明勋, . 浮泥−流泥静态间歇沉降与低压固结沉降计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2763-2772.
[2] 陈志波, 陈峰, 翁洋, 曹光伟, 曾旭明, 潘生贵, 杨辉, . 考虑土塞效应的大直径钢管桩竖向承载力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2224-2236.
[3] 刘润, 许泽伟, 陈广思, 梁超. 饱和软黏土中回型沉垫基础竖向承载特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 381-388.
[4] 陈怀林, 杨涛, 饶云康, 张哲, 吴红刚, 谢江伟, 滕汉卿. 基于分段式滑面应力测试系统的滑面应力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3562-3573.
[5] 刘动, 林沛元, 李伟科, 黄胜, 马保松, . 跨孔CT岩溶识别方法准确性的统计学评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 822-834.
[6] 朱怀龙, 朱碧堂, 罗如平, 徐长节, . 开口管桩循环打入过程及竖向承载特性大比尺模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3173-3184.
[7] 刘动, 林沛元, 陈贤颖, 黄胜, 马保松, . 深圳岩溶空间发育规律统计分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 1899-1912.
[8] 焦钰祺, 贺林林, 梁越, 刘旭菲, . 考虑结构性黏土应变软化效应的 桩靴竖向承载特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1374-1382.
[9] SHARAFUTDINOV Rafael. 三轴试验中砂土刚度的统计和回归分析及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(10): 2873-2886.
[10] 孙壮壮, 马刚, 周伟, 王一涵, 陈远, 肖海斌. 颗粒形状对堆石颗粒破碎强度尺寸效应的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 430-438.
[11] 贺志军, 雷皓程, 夏张琦, 赵炼恒. 多层软土地基中单桩沉降与内力位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 655-666.
[12] 骆顺天, 杨凡杰, 周辉, 张传庆, 王旭宏, 吕涛, 朱勇, 卢景景, . 基于统计分析的地下厂房边墙最大收敛变形 多指标预测方法 [J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(10): 3415-3424.
[13] 袁维, 刘尚各, 聂庆科, 王伟, . 基于冲切破坏模式的嵌岩桩桩端溶洞顶板 临界厚度确定方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2789-2798.
[14] 王忠瑾, 方鹏飞, 谢新宇, 王奎华, 王文军, 李金柱, . 带肋竹节桩竖向抗压承载力影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 381-388.
[15] 任连伟,周桂林,顿志林,何停印,杨权威,张敏霞,. 采空区建筑地基适宜性及沉降变形计算工程实例分析[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2922-2932.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!