岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (8): 2796-2804.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0216

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

北京砂卵石地层盆形冻结的温度场扩展规律研究

张晋勋,亓轶,杨昊,宋永威   

  1. 北京城建集团有限责任公司 博士后工作站,北京 100088
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-02 修回日期:2020-05-28 出版日期:2020-08-14 发布日期:2020-10-18
  • 作者简介:张晋勋,男,1967年生,博士,教授级高级工程师,主要从事工程施工领域的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    北京市科学技术委员会资助项目(No. Z161100001116088)

Temperature field expansion of basin-shaped freezing technology in sandy pebble stratum of Beijing

ZHANG Jin-xun, QI Yi, YANG Hao, SONG Yong-wei   

  1. Postdoctoral Workstation, Beijing Urban Construction Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100088, China
  • Received:2020-03-02 Revised:2020-05-28 Online:2020-08-14 Published:2020-10-18
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Beijing Municipal Commission of Science and Technology Foundation (Z161100001116088)

摘要: 地下工程盆形冻结止水结构包括位于开挖范围周围的冻结帷幕(盆壁)及开挖范围底部的水平冻结板(盆底)两部分。采用物理模型试验与数值模拟的方法,分析了北京典型富水砂卵石地层条件下盆形冻结在静水及0.5 m/d渗流条件下的温度场扩展规律。研究发现:盆形冻结技术作为冻结工法在市政工程领域的全新应用,对地下工程的施工区域能够有效起到冻结止水效果;盆形结构不同部位在不同的渗流条件会表现出不同的冻结交圈次序,静水条件下盆壁冻结管会先于盆底冻结管交圈,渗流条件下则依次是顺水流盆壁、盆底、背水面盆壁、迎水面盆壁,此时盆壁冻结是制约盆形冻结的关键因素,实际工程应重点关注盆壁冻结;冻结厚度是评价冻结效果最直观的指标,在静水条件下盆壁厚度趋于稳定,盆底水平冻结板厚度逐渐超过盆底冻结管长度且向盆内与盆外两个方向同时发展;渗流条件下,迎水面盆壁厚度最小,背水面盆壁由于绕流现象出现冻结锥体而局部厚度增大,盆底水平冻结板厚度仅向盆内单向发展。

关键词: 盆形冻结, 地下工程, 砂卵石地层, 渗流, 冻结厚度

Abstract: Basin-shaped freezing technology is applied to form a water-proof structure, which consists of two parts: the frozen curtain (basin wall) around the excavation zone and the horizontal frozen body (basin bottom) at the bottom of the excavation zone. In this paper, physical model test and numerical simulation were used to study temperature field expansion of basin-shaped technology under static water and 0.5 m/d seepage condition in water-rich sandy gravel stratum of Beijing. As a new application of freezing method in the field of municipal engineering, basin-shaped freezing technology can effectively play the role of water proofing. Different parts of basin structure show different frozen orders under different seepage conditions. Under the condition of static water, the basin wall is frozen prior to the basin bottom. While under the condition of seepage, the order of the freezing intersection of different positions is basin wall along the seepage, basin bottom, basin wall on the back surface and basin wall on the face surface in sequence, the freezing of basin wall is the key factor to restrict the basin-shaped freezing under this condition, and basin wall should be focused in the actual engineering. Freezing thickness is the most direct index to evaluate freezing effect. The freezing thickness of the basin wall tends to be stable under the condition of static water, and the freezing thickness of the basin bottom gradually exceeds the length of the freezing tube at the basin bottom and develops in both directions of in and outside the basin structure. Under seepage conditions, the freezing curtain of the basin wall with the smallest thickness appears on the front-water surface, while the local thickness of the freezing curtain on the basin wall of the back-water surface increases, and the horizontal freezing plate thickness at the basin bottom is only one-way develops inside of the basin.

Key words: basin-shaped freezing method, underground engineering, sandy gravel stratum, seepage, freezing thickness

中图分类号: TU 451
[1] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[2] 王昕琪, 冯子军, 陈正男, 高祺, 阴伟涛, 靳佩桦, 李玉彬, . 超临界水作用下花岗岩裂隙渗流特性演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2847-2858.
[3] 靳贵晓, 林劭聪, 姜启武, 黄明, 李熹, . 基于Kozeny-Carman方程的酶诱导碳酸钙沉淀固化砂土的渗流数学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2376-2386.
[4] 吴兵, 盛建龙, 叶祖洋, 周新, . 单裂隙岩体非线性渗流-法向应力耦合模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2495-2504.
[5] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[6] 张海燕, 胡新丽, 李亚博. 周期性渗流-应力耦合下滑带土的蠕变特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2189-2198.
[7] 任旺, 苗君, 雷万钧, 王络, 陈益峰, . 混凝土坝坝基立体排水的数值模拟与优化设计[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2281-2295.
[8] 刘杰, 钟伦伟, 钟振, 张宪尚, 隆清明, 应鹏, . 恒定法向刚度边界条件下受剪岩石裂隙非线性渗流特性的数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1919-1933.
[9] 邓汉鑫, 武东生, 王晓光, 王东坡. 非均质孔隙介质中循环驱替对两相渗流及毛细捕获的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 505-514.
[10] 王浩, 侯泓冰, 江文豪, . 考虑根系对水文特性影响下非饱和植被土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3329-3345.
[11] 张仁君, 肖碧, 杨志兵, 郑小康, 胡冉, 陈益峰. 裂隙介质中毛细黏聚作用影响颗粒运移-堵塞机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3473-3484.
[12] 唐劲舟, 唐文豪, 杨科, 赵延林, 刘钦节, 段敏克, 谭哲, . 循环荷载作用下含倾斜单裂隙砂岩力学响应特征及渗流演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 199-212.
[13] 韩枥兵, 李文涛, 韦昌富, . 自适应时间步长法在非饱和渗流中的应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 685-693.
[14] 李永威, 徐林荣, 傅金阳, 商拥辉, . 列车荷载作用下铁路路基填料渗透破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 299-308.
[15] 潘泓, 许嘉显, 骆冠勇, 彭斯格, 曹洪, . 三维有限元中奇异点源的简化分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2483-2491.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!