岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (10): 3405-3414.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.2160

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于简化力学模型的隧道锚极限承载力估值公式

王东英1, 2, 3, 4,汤华3,尹小涛3,杨光华1, 2, 4,姜燕1, 2   

  1. 1. 广东省水利水电科学研究院,广东 广州 510610;2. 广东省岩土工程技术研究中心,广东 广州 510640;3. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点试验室,湖北 武汉 430071;4. 华南理工大学 土木与交通学院,广东 广州 510640
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-24 修回日期:2020-05-12 出版日期:2020-10-12 发布日期:2020-11-07
  • 通讯作者: 尹小涛,男,1974年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事悬索桥锚碇承载力方面的研究工作。E-mail: 278205456@qq.com E-mail:wangdongying910309@163.com
  • 作者简介:王东英,女,1991年生,博士,工程师,主要从事悬索桥锚碇承载力方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51778609,No. 5177082703);中国博士后科学基金(No. 2019M662827)。

Estimation method of ultimate bearing capacity of tunnel-type anchorage based on simplified mechanical model

WANG Dong-ying1, 2, 3, 4, TANG Hua3, YIN Xiao-tao3, YANG Guang-hua1, 2, 4, JIANG Yan1, 2   

  1. 1. Guangdong Research Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510610, China; 2. Guangdong Technical Research Center of Geotechnical Engineering, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510640, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Geo-mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 4. School of Civil Engineering & Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510640, China
  • Received:2019-12-24 Revised:2020-05-12 Online:2020-10-12 Published:2020-11-07
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51778609, 5177082703) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2019M662827).

摘要: 悬索桥隧道式锚碇的设计理念为锚碇夹持岩体协同承载,因而承载能力远超同体积的重力式锚碇。但因目前对围岩协同作用认识尚不充分,在当前隧道式锚碇设计中仍保守地忽略锚碇和岩体间的挤压效应。为弄清锚碇?岩体协同承载的机制,揭示隧道锚承载能力提高的本质,通过分析隧道式锚碇建设至成桥全过程受力,建立隧道锚的简化力学模型,并引用Mindlin应力解分析了荷载沿锚碇轴向的传递规律以及荷载产生的作用于锚碇?岩体间的挤压应力分布,最终给出了隧道式锚碇极限承载力的简化估算方法,并通过伍家岗大桥隧道锚工程实例分析了结果的合理性。所得结论主要有:锚碇?岩体界面力主要由锚碇自重和锚碇?岩体相互挤压产生;锚碇?岩体界面附加应力自后锚面向前锚面呈先增后减的变化趋势,在距后锚面约1/3L处达到应力峰值;以容许抗剪强度为破坏判据解得的伍家岗长江大桥隧道式锚碇的极限承载力为3 504 MN,约为16倍的设计荷载,与室内试验值基本吻合。

关键词: 隧道式锚碇, 协同承载机制, Mindlin应力解, 附加挤压应力, 极限承载力

Abstract: The design philosophy of suspension bridge tunnel-type anchorage is that anchorage and rock bear the bridge load together. As the cooperative bearing mechanism of anchorage and rock, its bearing capacity is much higher than that of gravity anchorage with the same volume. However, due to the insufficient understanding of the synergy of surrounding rock, the squeezing effect between the anchorage and rock mass is still conservatively ignored in the design of tunnel anchorage. In order to understand the mechanism of coordinated bearing between anchorage and rock mass, and reveal the essence of improving the bearing capacity of tunnel anchor, a simplified mechanical model of tunnel anchor was established by analyzing the whole process from construction to completion of the bridge. Mindlin stress solution was used to analyze the law of load transmission along the anchorage axis and the distribution of compressive stress between anchorage and rock mass caused by load. A simplified method for estimating the ultimate bearing capacity of tunnel type anchorage was proposed. Then the recommend estimation method was successfully applied to Wujiagang suspension bridge project. The main conclusions are as follows: the interface force between anchorage and rock mass is mainly produced by the self weight of anchorage and the mutual extrusion of anchorage and rock mass; the additional stress at the interface between anchorage and rock mass increases first and then decreases from the rear anchor face to the front, and reaches the peak stress at about 1/3L away from the rear anchor surface; the ultimate bearing capacity of the tunnel anchorage of Wujiagang Yangtze River Bridge calculated by the allowable shear strength is 3 504 MN, about 16 times of the design load, which is basically consistent with the laboratory model test value.

Key words: tunnel-type anchorage, cooperative bearing mechanism, Mindlin stress solution, additional compressive stress, ultimate bearing capacity

中图分类号: TU 457
[1] 颜然, 孔纲强, 于江华, . 砂土地基中钻进比对螺旋桩安装性能和抗拔承载性能的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1778-1788.
[2] 赵崇熙, 徐超, 王清明, 张胜, 李昊煜, . 土工合成材料加筋土桥台极限承载力的离心载荷试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1643-1650.
[3] 熊根, 付栋康, 朱斌, 赖莹, . 软黏土中吸力锚承载特性离心试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1472-1480.
[4] 周志雄, 周凤玺, 曹小林, 汪镇, . 复合地基极限承载力的变分极限平衡法分析——竖向增强[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3748-3754.
[5] 何杰, 郭端伟, 宋德新, 刘孟鑫, 张磊, 文奇峰, . 循环荷载下楔形劲芯水泥土复合桩工作特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1353-1362.
[6] 黄炜, 简文彬, 杨坚, 豆红强, 罗金妹, . 多支盘锚杆的原型试验与荷载传递特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 520-530.
[7] 雷勇, 陈于斯, 谭豪, 李鹏甲, 刘运思, 于艺林, . 下伏空洞桥梁群桩桩端岩层极限承载力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3339-3348.
[8] 钟紫蓝, 韩春堂, 李锦强, 赵鑫, 缪惠全. 浅埋管道水平横向作用下砂土极限承载力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 95-103.
[9] 汪嘉钰, 刘润, 姬永红, 杨旭, 陈广思, 王晓磊, . 筒型基础水平向和抗倾承载力的极限分析上限解[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(3): 777-788.
[10] 屈春来, 付迪, 刘世伟, 冷先伦, 李建贺, 孙熇远. 非均质成层边坡极限承载力上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(10): 2923-2932.
[11] 晏青, 赵均海, 张常光. 基于统一强度理论的临坡加筋地基极限承载力新解[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1587-1600.
[12] 王东英, 尹小涛, 杨光华, . 悬索桥隧道式锚碇夹持效应的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 1003-1011.
[13] 杨坚, 简文彬, 黄炜, 黄聪惠, 罗金妹, 李先忠, . 注浆支盘式锚杆拉拔试验及极限承载力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 1126-1132.
[14] 冯衡, 高斐略, 刘观仕, 高彬, 肖飞, 曾二贤, . 风积沙地基金属装配式基础的真型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(12): 3328-3334.
[15] 林志, 胡伟, 赵璞, 陈秋南, 贺建清, 陈洁, 史旦达, . 砂土中平板圆锚倾斜拉拔承载特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(11): 3059-3068.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!