岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (10): 3443-3455.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.2168

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

四川省盐源玻璃村特大型玄武岩古滑坡复活机制

何坤1,胡卸文1, 2,马国涛1,刘波1,梅雪峰1,王蛟1,杨群3   

  1. 1. 西南交通大学 地球科学与环境工程学院,四川 成都 610031;2. 西南交通大学 高速铁路运营安全空间信息技术国家地方联合工程实验室, 四川 成都 610031;3. 四川省地质矿产勘查开发局九一五水文地质工程地质队,四川 眉山 620000
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-30 修回日期:2020-05-11 出版日期:2020-10-12 发布日期:2020-11-07
  • 通讯作者: 胡卸文,男,1963 年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事工程地质、环境地质方面的研究工作。E-mail: huxiewen@163.com E-mail: hekun429@126.com
  • 作者简介:何坤,男,1996年生,博士研究生,主要从事地质灾害成因与防治方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(No. 2018YFC1505401);国家自然科学基金(No. 41731285,No. 41672283,No. 41907225)。

The reactivated mechanism of Boli Village giant ancient basalt landslide in Yanyuan, Sichuan

HE Kun1, HU Xie-wen1, 2, MA Guo-tao1, LIU Bo1, MEI Xue-feng1, WANG Jiao1, YANG Qun3   

  1. 1. Faculty of Geoscience and Environmental Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 2. Engineering Laboratory Combined With National and Local of Spatial Information Technology of High Speed Railway Operation Safety, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 3. Bureau of Geology and Mineral Exploration and Development of Sichuan Province 915 Hydrogeology Engineering Geological Team, Meishan, Sichuan 620000, China
  • Received:2019-12-30 Revised:2020-05-11 Online:2020-10-12 Published:2020-11-07
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC1505401) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41731285, 41672283, 41907225).

摘要: 受前期14 d持续累计350.6 mm降雨影响,2018年7月19日盐源玻璃村一巨型玄武岩古滑坡体发生大规模复活,复活体积为1 390×104 m3,损坏房屋186间,造成重大经济损失。基于现场调查、无人机航测、钻探揭露、物理力学试验及数值模拟分析,在查明滑坡体地质结构、失稳特征基础上,对其影响因素及复活机制进行了探讨。研究结果表明,破碎岩土体及地形地貌是滑坡复活的孕灾基础,持续降雨及其引起的地下水位升高是滑坡复活的诱发因素。复活滑坡可分为主滑区和侧滑区两种破坏模式不同的区域。降雨作用下滑坡体内渗流场明显变化,孔隙水压力增大,导致7月13日古滑坡体开始发生变形,稳定性系数逐渐降低。受微地貌约束,主滑区具有多级、多次失稳,渐进破坏的特点。侧滑区斜坡前缘临空条件受坡脚主滑坡控制,在主滑坡运动过程中,侧滑区坡体位移量、最大剪切应变增量逐渐增大,塑性区扩展,破坏过程表现出与主滑坡一定的关联性和滞后性。分析表明,受地下水长期影响,滑带土体强度逐渐削弱,降雨导致坡体渗流作用加剧,抗剪强度降低,从而诱发滑坡复活。

关键词: 古滑坡, 复合滑坡, 复活机制, 稳定性, 盐源?丽江台缘拗陷

Abstract: Influenced by the continuous cumulative rainfall of 350.6 mm in the previous 14 days, a large-scale reactivation of a giant basalt ancient landslide in Yanyuan Boli Village occurred on July 19, 2018. The resurrected volume was 1 390×104 m3 and 186 houses were damaged, causing significant economic losses. Based on field investigation, aerial survey of drone, drilling, physical and mechanical experiments, and numerical simulation, the factors and reactivated mechanism of the landslide were identified on the basis of geological structure and characteristics of the landslide. The results show that fractured rock-soil mass and topography are the fundamental causes for reactivation, and continuous rainfall and the rising of groundwater level are the triggering factors of reactivation. The landslide can be divided into two areas with different failure modes: main slide area and lateral collapse area. The seepage field in the landslide has significantly changed due to rainfall, and the pore water pressure has increased. As a result, the ancient landslide began to deform on July 13, and the stability factor gradually decreased. Constrained by microtopography, the main slide area is characterized by multiple stages and retrogressive failure. The front edge of the lateral slope is controlled by the main slide at the toe of the slope. During the movement of the main slide, the slope displacement and maximum shear strain increment in the lateral collapse area gradually increase, and the plastic zone expands, showing a certain relevance and lag with the main slide. This analysis indicates that due to the long-term influence of groundwater, the strength of the sliding mass gradually weakens. Rainfall leads to intensification of slope seepage and a decrease in shear strength, which induces landslide reactivation.

Key words: ancient landslide, compound slide, reactivated mechanism, stability, Yanyuan-Lijiang Platform margin geotectogene

中图分类号: P 642.22
[1] 冯德銮, 余洋, 梁仕华. 碱激发地聚物固化滨海软土的强度和水稳定性研究进展与评述[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 13-39.
[2] 邓其宁, 崔玉龙, 王炯超, 郑俊, 许冲, . 三维边坡稳定性计算的ChatGPT辅助编程方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 322-334.
[3] 徐全, 侯靖, 杨剑, 杨昕光, 倪绍虎, 陈鑫. 基于合成岩体技术的岩质边坡稳定性精细化分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2062-2070.
[4] 李邵军, 张世殊, 李永红, 柳秀洋, 李治国, 徐鼎平, 程丽娟, 江权, 汤大明, 陈刚, . 双江口水电站极高应力大型地下厂房硬岩破坏机制与稳定性控制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1581-1594.
[5] 刘祥宁, 张文杰, . 酸性干湿循环下铬污染土固化体浸出行为研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1196-1204.
[6] 曹虎, 张广清, 李世远, 汪文瑞, 谢彭旭, 孙伟, 李帅, . 基于断裂过程区的压裂驱油水力裂缝 扩展模型及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 798-810.
[7] 孙文超, 王君豪, 徐文杰, 董晓阳, 任禾, 王洪兵, 张学杰, 王恒威, . 基于物质点法的高速公路弃渣场稳定性及 灾害动力学分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 991-1000.
[8] 邓东平, 徐润冬, 彭一航, 文莎莎. 强度空间非均质性与各向异性特征下边坡稳定性极限平衡滑面应力法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 55-72.
[9] 钱法桥, 邓亚虹, 慕焕东, 杨楠, 刘凡, 王梦晨, . 基于小波变换和拟动力法的边坡地震稳定性评价方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 88-96.
[10] 魏星, 陈睿, 程世涛, 朱明, 王子健, . 成都膨胀土地区深基坑降雨稳定性分析与变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 525-534.
[11] 郭晓刚, 马垒, 张超, 淦树成, 王华, 甘一雄, 周通, . 软弱基底排土场边坡逆排堆高速率及稳定性控制方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 596-606.
[12] 林滨强, 章德生, 简文彬, 豆红强, 王浩, 樊秀峰, . 风驱雨作用下植被斜坡稳定性响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2765-2774.
[13] 冯世进, 徐熠, 杨俊毅, 郑奇腾, 张晓磊, . 基于集对-组合赋权的填埋场失稳风险评价方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2129-2139.
[14] 何梓雷, 蒋关鲁, 冯海洲, 陈虹羽, 郭玉丰, 何晓龙, 李杰, . 基于变形的降雨后地震基覆型边坡劣化特性与机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1789-1802.
[15] 黄佳佳, 蒋明镜, 王华宁, . 中国南海神狐海域水合物储层井壁稳定可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1505-1516.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!