岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (11): 3563-3572.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0191

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

应力状态对粗粒料力学特性影响的大型真三轴试验

姜景山1, 2,左永振2,程展林2,潘家军2,张超1,韦有信1   

  1. 1. 南京工程学院 建筑工程学院,江苏 南京 211167;2. 长江科学院 水利部岩土力学与工程重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430010
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-09 修回日期:2020-04-13 出版日期:2020-11-11 发布日期:2020-12-24
  • 作者简介:姜景山,男,1978年生,博士,副教授,主要从事粗粒土力学性质、地基和路基处理等方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划资助(No. 2017YFC0404804);国家自然科学基金-雅砻江联合基金重点项目资助(No. U1765203);国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 51679072, No. 51778282);南京工程学院校级科研基金项目资助(No. CKJB201706);长江科学院开放研究基金资助项目(No. CKWV2017510/KY)。

Effects of stress state on mechanical properties of coarse granular material using large-scale true triaxial tests

JIANG Jing-shan1, 2, ZUO Yong-zhen2, CHENG Zhan-lin2, PAN Jia-jun2, ZHANG Chao1, WEI You-xin1   

  1. 1. School of Architectural Engineering, Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211167, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Mechanics and Engineering of Ministry of Water Resources, Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan, Hubei 430010, China
  • Received:2020-01-09 Revised:2020-04-13 Online:2020-11-11 Published:2020-12-24
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China(2017YFC0404804), the National Natural Science Foundation of China-Yalong River Joint Fund for Key Projects(U1765203), the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (51679072, 51778282) , the Scientific Research Foundation of Nanjing Institute of Technology (CKJB201706) and the CRSRI Open Research Program (CKWV2017510/KY).

摘要: 土石坝所处的应力状态较接近平面应变应力状态或三维应力状态,而常规三轴试验低估了粗粒料的力学性能。应用大型真三轴仪对常规三轴应力状态、平面应变应力状态和真三轴应力状态( 0.25, 为中主应力系数, 、 、 分别为大、中、小主应力)下粗粒料的力学特性进行了压缩试验研究。试验结果表明:相同小主应力下,常规三轴试验、平面应变试验、真三轴试验的大、小主应力之差与大主应力方向应变的关系曲线依次变高变陡。某一试验加载条件下,体应变随球应力的增大而增大,初始剪切阶段增加较慢,随后呈线性增大,不同小主应力的体应变曲线较为接近。平面应变试验强度和真三轴试验强度比常规三轴试验强度有较大增长,真三轴试验强度增加百分比大于平面应变试验强度增加百分比。初始弹性模量随小主应力的增大呈线性增大。平面应变状态下中主应力系数随大主应力方向应变的增大而增大,初始剪切阶段增长较缓,之后近似呈线性增大。相同小主应力下,从常规三轴应力状态至平面应变应力状态再到真三轴应力状态,小主应力方向应变均为膨胀变形,且膨胀变形依次增大。同一试验加载条件下,小主应力较小时,应力比(偏应力与球应力之比)与偏应变的关系曲线位于上方。

关键词: 粗粒料, 大型真三轴试验, 力学特性, 平面应变应力状态, 中主应力, 偏应力, 球应力

Abstract: The stress state of earth and rockfill dams is close to plane strain stress state or three-dimensional stress state, while the conventional triaxial test underestimates the mechanical properties of coarse granular material. The mechanical properties of coarse granular material under conventional triaxial stress state, plane strain stress state and true triaxial stress state( 0.25) were investigated by compression tests using large-scale true triaxial apparatus. The test results show that the relationship curves between the difference of major principal stress and minor principal stress and the strain in the direction of major principal stress become higher and steeper in sequence from conventional triaxial test, to plane strain test, to true triaxial test under the same minor principal stress. The volumetric strain increases with the increase of the spherical stress under a certain test loading condition, which shows a slow increase at the initial shearing stage and then increases linearly. The volumetric strain curves are close for different minor principal stresses. The strengths of plane strain stress state and true triaxial stress state are much greater than that of conventional triaxial stress state, and the percentage of strength increase under true triaxial stress state is larger than that of plane strain stress state. The initial elastic modulus increases linearly with the increase of the minor principal stress. In plane strain stress state, the coefficient of intermediate principal stress increases with the increase of the strain in the direction of major principal stress. The coefficient of intermediate principal stress increases slowly in the initial shearing stage and then increases linearly with the increase of the strain in the direction of major principle stress. From conventional triaxial stress state to plane strain stress state and then to true triaxial stress state, the strains in the direction of minor principal stress are all expansion deformations, and the expansion deformations increase successively under the same minor principal stress. The relationship curve between the ratio of deviatoric stress to spherical stress and deviatoric strain of small minor principal stress is located at the top for a certain test loading condition.

Key words: coarse granular material, large-scale true triaxial test, mechanical property, plane strain stress state, intermediate principle stress, deviatoric stress, spherical stress

中图分类号: TU 411
[1] 吴俊, 闵一凡, 征西遥, 韩晨, 牛富俊, 朱宝林, . 地质聚合物固化淤泥法制备再生细骨料的压缩变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 159-170.
[2] 屈俊童, 时启壮, 郭颖杰, 张 翔, 刘 熠, 蒋德阳. 冻融循环作用下冰碛土力学特性及损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2859-2872.
[3] 侯小强, 杨芮, 李瑞冬, 樊小鹏, 郑佳乐, 侯宝胜, . 卵石土混合体随机生成方法与宏细观力学演化特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2967-2979.
[4] 张培森, 王洪伟, 洪荒, 许大强, 陈增宝, 邓云驰, 梁展, 李金坤, 陈文豪, 崔乾, . 渗流-采动应力耦合作用下深部砂岩力学及能量演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1997-2010.
[5] 曹祎, 荣传新, 王衍森, 常磊, 王彬, . 冻结钙质黏土复杂应力路径下的力学响应及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2071-2084.
[6] 宋勇军, 卢云龙, 王双龙, 谢丽君, 操警辉, 安旭晨, . 岩石冻融过程未冻水含量演化特征及对力学特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1049-1059.
[7] 张涛艺, 王家全, 林志南, 唐毅, . 细粒含量对砾性土路基劣化及静力剪切特性影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1141-1152.
[8] 吕志涛, 赵志远, 蔡毅, 夏才初, 段君义. 单向冻融作用下砂岩力学各向异性演化与损伤模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3421-3430.
[9] 张瑨, 李书恒, 朱其志, 石玲玲, 邵建富, . 基于深度学习的岩石短长期本构模型及灰砂岩变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 289-302.
[10] 唐劲舟, 唐文豪, 杨科, 赵延林, 刘钦节, 段敏克, 谭哲, . 循环荷载作用下含倾斜单裂隙砂岩力学响应特征及渗流演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 199-212.
[11] 李宗恩, 刘星炎, 郑青松, 胡琪, 潘乾通, . 连通率对不同倾角结构面岩样力学特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 244-256.
[12] 王辉, 钮新强, 马刚, 周伟, . 干湿循环作用下堆石料宏细观力学特性的离散元模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 665-676.
[13] 李永强, 许言, 陈波, 熊健辉, 卢玢宇, . 反压诱导有效应力增生模式与土体强度关联机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2338-2350.
[14] 张科, 关世豪, 齐飞飞, 徐奕, 金克盛, . 冲刷作用下砂岩宏观力学特性及微观结构[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1929-1938.
[15] 郅彬, 王尚杰. 干湿-冻融循环下黄土力学特性及损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1092-1102.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!