岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 93-103.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0945

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

平面P1波斜入射下海底洞室地震响应解析分析

朱赛男1,2,李伟华1, 2,LEE Vincent W3,赵成刚1, 2   

  1. 1. 北京交通大学 土木建筑工程学院,北京 100044;2. 北京交通大学 城市地下工程教育部重点实验室,北京 100044; 3. 南加州大学 土木工程系,加利福尼亚 洛杉矶,美国
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-06 修回日期:2020-10-14 出版日期:2021-01-11 发布日期:2021-01-06
  • 通讯作者: 李伟华,女,1976年生,博士,教授,主要从事土木工程防灾减灾方面的研究工作。E-mail: whli@bjtu.edu.cn E-mail: 15115293@bjtu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:朱赛男,女,1990年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土地震工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(No. 2015CB0578000);国家自然科学基金(No. 51378058)

Analytical solution of seismic response of an undersea cavity under incident P1-wave

ZHU Sai-nan1, 2, LI Wei-hua1, 2, LEE Vincent W3, ZHAO Cheng-gang1, 2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Urban Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China; 3. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
  • Received:2020-07-06 Revised:2020-10-14 Online:2021-01-11 Published:2021-01-06
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (973 Program) (2015CB0578000) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51378058).

摘要: 基于无黏性可压缩理想流体介质波动理论和Biot流体饱和多孔介质波动理论,考虑水下饱和土的流固耦合,借助Hankel函数积分变换法(HFITM)给出入射平面P1波在海底洞室周围散射问题的解析解。相比传统研究中的“大圆弧假定”,Hankel函数积分变换法可以较好地处理半空间表面边界条件。利用该解析解,计算分析了洞室表面透水条件、入射角度、入射频率、海水水深和饱和土的孔隙率等因素对水?土交界面处水平位移、竖向位移和洞室表面动水压力、环周总应力的影响。结果表明:洞室表面透水条件对水?土交界面处水平位移和竖向位移影响较小;随着斜入射角的增加,水?土交界面处竖向位移减小;随着入射频率的增加,水?土交界面处水平位移随之增加;海水水深为2.5倍SV波的波长时,水?土交界面处水平位移及洞室表面动水压力最大值最大;随着孔隙率的增加,水?土交界面处水平位移、竖向位移和洞室表面环周总应力减小,而洞室表面动水压力随之增加。

关键词: 海底洞室, 平面P1波, 散射问题, 地震响应, 解析解

Abstract: Based on the wave propagation theory of saturated porous medium proposed by Biot and wave propagation theory of inviscid compressible ideal fluid, considering the fluid-mechanical coupling of underwater saturated soil, an analytical solution of the scattering problem of the incident plane P1-wave around the undersea cavity is presented using the Hankel function integral transformation method (HFITM). Compared with the “large arc hypothesis” in traditional research, the HFITM can better deal with the surface boundary of the half space. Using the analytical solution, the effects of permeability conditions of the cavity, incident angle, incident frequency, seawater depth and the porosity of saturated soil on the displacement (horizontal and vertical displacement) of the interface between water and saturated soil and the stress (hydrodynamic pressure and total circumferential stress) on the surface of the cavity. The results show that the permeability conditions on the surface of the cavity have a small effect on the displacement of the interface between water and saturated soil; as the oblique incident angle increases, the vertical displacement on the interface between the ideal water and saturated soil decreases; the horizontal displacement of the interface between water and saturated soil increases as the incident frequency increases; when the depth of seawater is 2.5 times the wavelength of the SV-wave, the maximum horizontal displacement on the interface between water and saturated soil and hydrodynamic pressure on the surface of the cavity are the largest; the displacement of the interface between water and saturated soil and the total circumferential stress on the surface of the cavity decrease with the increasing porosity, while the hydrodynamic pressure on the surface of the cavity increases.

Key words: undersea cavity, plane P1- waves, scattering problem, seismic response, analytical solution

中图分类号: TU 452
[1] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[2] 刘健, 夏勇, 江权, 陈涛, 贺维国, 范国刚, 熊先涛, 郑虹, . 强烈构造区硬梁包水电站地下洞室群围岩变形破坏特征与泸定地震响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2265-2280.
[3] 杨景泉, 郑长杰, 丁选明, . 竖向入射P波激励下饱和土中管桩地震响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1477-1488.
[4] 周航, 汪义圣, 亓戈平, . 黏弹性土中异形桩横向动力响应半解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 761-774.
[5] 王浩, 侯泓冰, 江文豪, . 考虑根系对水文特性影响下非饱和植被土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3329-3345.
[6] 张智卿, 刘鑫, 刘开富, 吴君涛, 吴文兵, . 横观各向同性土体中端承桩水平振动特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3371-3382.
[7] 周桓竹, 刘圣安, 李斌, 陈炜昀, 苏雷, 郑俊杰, 郑烨炜, . 穿越变化地层的沉管隧道接头地震响应的解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 289-298.
[8] 江学辉, 颜建伟, 罗文俊, 李佳宝, 徐长节. 纵向压力和加固钢板对隧道力学性能影响的解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1623-1632.
[9] 王亦炀, 李传勋, 李阔, 陆向综. 竖井地基大应变非线性固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1446-1456.
[10] 陶志刚, 丰于翔, 赵易, 张晓宇, 何满潮, 雷啸天, . 穿断层隧道NPR锚索支护体系抗震特性振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 939-949.
[11] 刘景锦, 罗学思, 雷华阳, 郑刚, 罗昊鹏, . 等应变条件下增压式真空预压固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 809-821.
[12] 任璐瑶, 吴镇杰, 黄啟超, 关振长. 考虑轴力影响的盾构隧道纵向地震响应解析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 2971-2980.
[13] 高柳, 吕述晖, 王奎华, . 缺陷桩-梁系统的动力特性应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 3095-3104.
[14] 张玉国, 杨文兵, 赵雅纯, 王闯, 赵亚敏. 双向渗流下考虑应力时空效应的组合桩复合地基固结理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 184-196.
[15] 余俊, 李东凯, 和振, 张志中. 带有两端防渗墙坝基的各向异性渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2381-2388.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!