岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 143-150.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0522

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

盾构下穿非连续管线变形特性及预测方法研究

史江伟1, 2,范燕波1, 2,裴伟伟3,陈永辉1, 2,张显1, 2   

  1. 1. 河海大学 岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室,江苏 南京 210024; 2. 河海大学 岩土工程科学研究所,江苏 南京 210024;3. 温州设计集团有限公司,浙江 温州 325000
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-28 修回日期:2020-09-23 出版日期:2021-01-11 发布日期:2021-01-06
  • 作者简介:史江伟,男,1984年生,博士,副教授,主要从事土-结构相互作用方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51608170);中央高校基本科研业务费项目(No. B200202082)。

An investigation of deformation mechanisms of jointed pipelines due to underneath tunnel excavation

SHI Jiang-wei1, 2, FAN Yan-bo1, 2, PEI Wei-wei3, CHEN Yong-hui1, 2, ZHANG Xian1, 2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210024, China; 2. Geotechnical Research Institute, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210024, China; 3. Wenzhou Design Assembly Company Ltd., Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325000, China
  • Received:2020-04-28 Revised:2020-09-23 Online:2021-01-11 Published:2021-01-06
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51608170) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (B200202082).

摘要: 城市地下管线采用承插式接口连接,管线结构的连续性与否取决于接口刚度。然而,现有研究大都假定地下管线为连续结构,忽略了接口转角对管线变形的影响。开展土工离心模型试验和两阶段有限元参数分析,系统研究了盾构下穿不同接口刚度管线的变形特性。发现非连续管线的薄弱接口导致其整体抗弯刚度明显小于连续管线,且接口转动导致非连续管线具有更好的与土体协调变形能力。因此,盾构下穿施工引起的非连续管线沉降明显大于连续管线。非连续管的结构连续性假定将大大低估管线沉降。盾构下穿引起的接口转角与地层损失呈线性关系。基于系统的有限元参数分析,建立了区分相对刚性、柔性管线的无量纲组。针对相对刚性、柔性的非连续管线,分别建立了管节相对长度、管?土相对刚度与接口转角的预测方法,利用离心模型试验结果验证了预测方法的合理性。新方法能有效地预测盾构穿越地下管线的接口转角,研究成果可应用于城市地下管网改造工程。

关键词: 离心模型试验, 隧道开挖, 非连续管线, 接口转角, 预测方法

Abstract: The underground pipelines are connected by socket joints, and the continuity of the pipeline depends on joint rigidity. However, previous studies mainly simplified pipelines as continuous structures, and the effect of joint rotation on pipeline deformation mechanisms was ignored. By conducting centrifuge model tests and two-stage numerical parametric studies, tunneling-induced deformation mechanisms of pipelines with different joints stiffness are explored in this study. Because of the existence of flexible joints, overall flexural stiffness of jointed pipelines is much smaller than that of continuous ones. Moreover, tunneling-induced joint rotation results in jointed pipelines to have a better ability to deform with surrounding soils. Thus, tunneling-induced settlement in jointed pipelines is much larger than that of continuous pipelines. By simplifying jointed pipelines as continuous structures, tunneling-induced pipeline settlement is grossly underestimated. A linear relationship between the joint rotation angle and volume loss is observed. Based on parametric studies, a dimensionless group of relative pipeline-soil stiffness is established to differentiate relatively rigid and flexible pipelines. Calculation charts between the relative values of the length of pipe segment, pipe-soil stiffness and joint rotations are established for relatively rigid and flexible pipelines, respectively. Centrifuge test results are used to verify the proposed calculation charts. The proposed method can effectively predict the joint rotation angle due to tunnel excavation. Research finding from this study can be used in underground pipeline network reconstruction projects in urban cities.

Key words: centrifuge modeling, tunnel excavation, jointed pipelines, joint rotation, prediction method

中图分类号: TU 470
[1] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[2] 张昕晔, 刘志伟, 翁效林, 李铉聪, 赵建崇, 刘小光. 上砂下黏复合地层隧道开挖面稳定性及破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3637-3648.
[3] 陈磊, 张强, 贾朝军, 雷明锋, 黄娟, 胡晶, . 强降雨对库岸堆积体边坡稳定性影响的离心模型试验和数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1423-1434.
[4] 熊根, 付栋康, 朱斌, 赖莹, . 软黏土中吸力锚承载特性离心试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1472-1480.
[5] 苟永平, 叶琼瑶, 韦立德, 司家琛, . 央达隧道掌子面前方边坡地表开裂研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 548-560.
[6] 张院生, 雷云超, 强小俊, 吴东东, 王东坡, 王计华, . 多排微型桩框架结构加固边坡离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1983-1994.
[7] 彭文明, 张雪东, 夏勇, . 软弱覆盖层上土石坝动力离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1771-1778.
[8] 张治国, 罗杰, 朱正国, PAN Y T, 孙苗苗, . 强降雨影响下盾构隧道开挖面稳定性的三维对数螺旋模型上限解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3587-3601.
[9] 樊科伟, 邹维列, 王柳江, 廖洁, 刘斯宏, . 土工合成材料缓冲层减压膨胀土挡墙侧向压力的实用预测方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(11): 3182-3190.
[10] 罗维平, 袁大军, 金大龙, 陆平, 陈健, 郭海鹏, . 富水砂层盾构开挖面支护压力与地层变形关系 离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 345-354.
[11] 睢博栋 . 单根垂直旋喷桩施工引起土体位移的预测方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 513-520.
[12] 兰景岩, 蔡金豆, 吴连斌, 史庆旗, . 含隧道场地地震动放大效应的深度变化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(8): 2083-2091.
[13] 李燕, 李同录, 侯晓坤, 李华, 张杰, . 用孔隙分布曲线预测压实黄土非饱和渗透曲 线及其适用范围的探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2395-2404.
[14] 朱谭方, 辛鹏, 姚磊华, 胡乐, 胡波, . 水力作用诱发硬土软岩滑坡启动机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(10): 2733-2740.
[15] 丁楚, 余文瑞, 史江伟, 张宇亭, 陈永辉, . 水平循环荷载下桩基变形特性的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2659-2664.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!