岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3): 826-832.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0240

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

悬挂式止水帷幕深基坑减压降水的简化计算方法

李瑛,陈东,刘兴旺,谢锡荣,童星,张金红   

  1. 浙江省建筑设计研究院,浙江 杭州 310006
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-06 修回日期:2020-12-21 出版日期:2021-03-11 发布日期:2021-03-17
  • 作者简介:李瑛,男,1985年生,工学博士,高级工程师,国家注册土木(岩土)工程师,从事基坑围护结构设计和土力学原理研究。
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省重点研发计划项目(No.2017C03020)。

Simplified calculation method of decompression dewatering for deep excavation with suspended waterproof curtain

LI Ying, CHEN Dong, LIU Xing-wang, XIE Xi-rong, TONG Xing, ZHANG Jin-hong   

  1. Zhejiang Province Architectural Design and Research Institute, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310006, China
  • Received:2020-03-06 Revised:2020-12-21 Online:2021-03-11 Published:2021-03-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Key Research and Development Projects of Zhejiang Province(2017C03020).

摘要: 采用悬挂式止水帷幕结合坑内减压降水的墙?井系统可有效减小坑内降水量或坑外水头降深。将基坑按面积相等等效为井壁进水的大直径承压水非完整井,并令流入井内的水量等于止水帷幕内坑底承压水含水层内的竖直向渗流量,以此建立坑内减压抽水量与坑外承压水头降深的关系式。该理论公式计算结果在止水帷幕插入比大于0.6且基坑半径与承压含水层厚度之比小于2.0时与有限元计算结果比较接近。因未考虑渗流方向变化时的水头损失,数值计算结果和工程案例实测数据均表明理论公式计算结果偏大。利用参数分析研究承压含水层渗透系数各向异性、基坑平面面积、止水帷幕插入长度等因素对减压降水的影响规律。坑内减压抽水量或坑外水头降深与墙?井系统三维渗流场有关,渗流场越接近竖向渗流,坑外水头降深越小,水位接近初始状态。相比数值分析,理论公式简便直观,可用于减压降水的初步分析。

关键词: 承压水, 降水, 止水帷幕, 非完整井, 渗透系数

Abstract: The wall-well system could effectively decrease the discharge inside or drawdown outside the foundation pit that comprising suspended waterproof curtain and dewatering wells. Foundation pit is assumed to be a large partially penetrating well with the same area. Based on the assumption that flow into the well is equal to the vertical flow inside the waterproof curtain, an equation is established to calculate the discharge inside and drawdown outside the pit. The discharge calculated by the proposed equation is close to that by simulated results while L/M > 0.6 and r/M < 2.0. It is showed that the calculated discharge is slightly larger than those by numerical analysis or case history. This phenomenon may be attributed to the neglection of energy loss during the flow direction change. Then the influence of some factors including the ratio between horizontal and vertical permeability coefficients, the foundation area and the curtain length is studied. Parametric analyses show that the discharge inside or drawdown outside the pit can be determined by the degree of flow field approaching vertical flow. The proposed equation is suitable for preliminary analysis of decompression dewater when cutting off confined aquifer is difficult.

Key words: confined water, dewatering, waterproof curtain, partially penetrating well, permeability coefficient

中图分类号: TU46+3
[1] 张兴文, 曹净, 雷舒羽, 李育红, 程芸, 张柠锐, . 富里酸环境对含腐殖酸水泥土结构及渗透性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 249-261.
[2] 曹瑞栋, 刘斯宏, 田金博, 鲁洋, 张勇敢, 李帆, . 考虑拉伸的土工袋体织物渗流特性试验及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2711-2720.
[3] 刘文林, 鄂天龙, 冯杨州, 牛松荧, 张子堂, 孙熠, 陈宏信, . 纳米改性地聚合物隔离墙材料基本工程特性及冻融循环耐久性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2039-2048.
[4] 郑思维, 胡明鉴, 霍玉龙, . 钙质砂渗透性影响因素及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 217-224.
[5] 崔允亮, 潘方然, 高楥园, 金子原, . 真空预压淤堵区渗透系数的计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2085-2093.
[6] 王新志, 黄鹏, 雷学文, 文东升, 丁浩桢, 刘铠诚, . 硫酸锌胶结珊瑚砂渗透特性试验及工程应用探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2094-2104.
[7] 薛秀丽, 刘治珩, 曾超峰, 白 宁, 陈宏波. 开挖前抽水条件下基坑围挡两侧非极限土压力计算模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1699-1708.
[8] 李品良, 许强, 刘佳良, 何攀, 纪续, 陈婉琳, 彭大雷, . 盐分影响重塑黄土渗透性的微观机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 504-512.
[9] 吴广水, 田慧会, 郝丰富, 王书齐, 杨文洲, 祝婷梅, . 基于核磁共振T2时间分布快速预测不同干密度土体的渗透系数[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 513-520.
[10] 焦卫国, 庹斌, 张松, 贺明卫, 林长松, 刘振男, . 西北非湿润区毛细阻滞覆盖层防渗性能验证与长期服役高危易渗气象段分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 539-547.
[11] 蔚立元, 杨瀚清, 王晓琳, 刘日成, 王蓥森. 循环剪切作用下三维粗糙裂隙非线性渗流特性数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2757-2766.
[12] 张宇, 何想, 路桦铭, 马国梁, 刘汉龙, 肖杨, . 微生物-膨润土联合矿化防渗模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2337-2349.
[13] 孙彦晓, 刘松玉, 童立元, 王峻, 崔佳, 李世龙, 李敏, . 长江漫滩区明挖隧道基坑降承压水优化分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1800-1810.
[14] 王锐松, 郭成超, 林沛元, 王复明, . 富水粉土基坑装配式可回收支护开挖响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 843-853.
[15] 文少杰, 郑文杰, 胡文乐, . 铅污染对黄土宏观持水性能和微观结构演化的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 451-460.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!