岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6): 1540-1548.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1279

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

黏质土石混合体渗透特性试验及演化机制探讨

鲁洋1, 2, 3,刘斯宏1, 3,张勇敢1,杨蒙1   

  1. 1. 河海大学 水利水电学院,江苏 南京 210098;2. 河海大学 岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室,江苏 南京 210098; 3. 河海大学 大坝长效特性及环保修复技术中西联合实验室,江苏 南京 210098
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-24 修回日期:2021-05-11 出版日期:2021-06-11 发布日期:2021-06-15
  • 通讯作者: 刘斯宏,男,1964年生,博士,教授,主要从事土石坝工程、土工袋技术及水工岩土等方面的研究。E-mail: sihongliu@hhu.edu.cn E-mail: luy@hhu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:鲁洋,男,1991年生,博士,助理研究员,主要从事水工岩土工程和特殊岩土体力学方面的研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.U1765205,No.51979091);中国博士后科学基金(No.2021M690878);中国水利水电科学研究院水利部水工程建设与安全重点实验室开放研究基金(No.IWHR-ENGI-202006)。

Experimental study and mechanism analysis of permeability performance of clayey soil-rock mixtures

LU Yang1, 2, 3, LIU Si-hong1, 3, ZHANG Yong-gan1, YANG Meng1   

  1. 1. College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 3. International Joint Laboratory of Long-term Behaviour & Environmentally Friendly Rehabilitation Technologies on Dams, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China
  • Received:2020-08-24 Revised:2021-05-11 Online:2021-06-11 Published:2021-06-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(U1765205, 51979091), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(2021M690878) and the Open Research Fund of Key Laboratory of Construction and Safety of Water Engineering of the Ministry of Water Resources, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research(IWHR-ENGI-202006).

摘要: 为探究含黏土基质的土石混合体的渗透特性演化规律及其物理机制,分别对不同含石量的黏质土石混合体开展重型击实试验和三轴渗透试验。试验结果表明:对于0%~70%含石量的黏质土石混合体,击实曲线形态呈单峰状,与纯黏土类似;当含石量大于70%时,压实效果开始下降;随着含石量的增加,最优含水率持续降低,而最大干密度先增大后减小,在约70%含石量时达到最大值;当黏质土石混合体达到最优压实状态时,其中黏土基质部分的含水率不依赖于含石量而基本保持一致;含石量为0%~30%时,黏土基质达到较高的压实程度,孔隙比基本保持不变,随着含石量的进一步增加,黏土基质孔隙比逐渐增大,当含石量超过70%时,急剧增大。渗透系数随含石量的增加先减小后增大,并在30%含石量附近达到最小值。基于土石细观结构分布和黏土基质压实孔隙比演化规律,提出一个黏质土石混合体渗透路径概念模型,将不同含石量混合体试样的渗透路径划分为:低渗透性压实黏土路径、超低渗透性含砾石黏土路径、中渗透性土石结合面路径、高渗透性骨架空隙路径,较好地解释了黏质土石混合体渗透特性随含石量的演化机制。

关键词: 土石混合体, 黏土基质, 含石量, 压实, 三轴渗透, 细观结构

Abstract: In order to study the evolution law and physical mechanism of permeability performance of compacted clayey soil-rock mixtures, a series of dynamic compression tests and triaxial permeability tests were conducted. The compaction curves of soil-rock mixtures show obvious unimodal patterns similar to those of pure clayey soils when rock content CR < 70%. When CR > 70%, the compaction effect begins to decline. A peak for the maximum dry density of the mixtures can generally be achieved when the CR is around 70%. In addition, increasing CR will decrease the optimum water content of the soil mixtures, but this almost does not change the water content of clay matrix at the optimum compaction state. Clay matrix can be compacted to the densest state when CR < 30%, beyond which the clay matrix void ratio gradually increases. When CR > 70%, the clay matrix void ratio presents a sharp increase. The permeability shows constant or a slight decrease as the rock content increases from zero to about 30%. The lowest permeability can be achieved when CR is around 30%. Beyond this amount, the permeability coefficient increases rapidly with a further increase in rock content. Based on the soil-rock meso-structural distribution and clay matrix void ratio, a concept model for flow path in clayey soil-rock mixtures was proposed. The flow path in compacted soil-rock mixtures can be divided into four kinds: low permeability path in compacted clayey soil matrix, ultra-low permeability path in compacted clayey soil matrix with gravels, medium permeability path in soil-rock interfaces, high permeability path in skeleton voids of rock aggregates.

Key words: soil-rock mixtures, clay matrix, rock content, compaction, triaxial permeability, meso-structure

中图分类号: TU445
[1] 侯克鹏, 江帆, 张超, 龚晶汉, . 土石混合体−基岩接触面剪切的基覆面形态效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 271-284.
[2] 张佩, 杨承儒, 侯世伟, 杜修力, . 基于内聚力单元的土石混合体细观数值方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1620-1631.
[3] 卢正, 李梦威, 唐楚轩, 胡智, 赵阳, 则志辉, 姚海林, . 考虑不同级配影响的填石路基压实质量评价研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3346-3354.
[4] 王莘晴, 张晓超, 裴向军, . 弃渣土体分形级配方程及最大干密度预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3157-3166.
[5] 宋二波, 姚仰平, 牛玺荣, . 基于加速度峰值的填土智能压实质量评价方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3054-3064.
[6] 赵阳, 卢正, 颜廷舟, 李剑, 唐楚轩, 邱煜, 姚海林, . 土工格室加筋路基振动压实行为及预应力效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 771-782.
[7] 文少杰, 郑文杰, 胡文乐, . 黄土覆盖层气体突破和循环气体渗透特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 471-476.
[8] THUY Do Van, TIEP Pham Duc, HIEU Nguyen Van, THANG Pham Cao. 循环三轴试验加载频率和压实度对重塑砂土液化行为的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1813-1823.
[9] 邓志兴, 谢康, 李泰灃, 王武斌, 郝哲睿, 李佳珅, . 基于粗颗粒嵌锁点高铁级配碎石振动压实质量控制新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1835-1849.
[10] 黄锋, 米吉龙, 杨永浩, 董广法, 张班, 刘星辰, . 分级动荷载下土石混合体滞回曲线形态特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 674-684.
[11] 刘忠玉, 黄通通, 曹永青, 刘朝凡. 生物炭水泥土渗透特性试验及细观结构分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 2929-2936.
[12] 彭宇, 张虎元, 周光平, 谭煜, . 酒精湿化法调配压实膨润土缓冲回填材料含水率研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 235-244.
[13] 程光, 范文, 于宁宇, 姜程程, 陶宜权, . 土−石混合体土−水特性和微观结构的相关性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 365-374.
[14] 程树范, 曾亚武, 高睿, 李涵, . 干湿作用下受荷石膏质泥岩的不可逆膨胀特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 332-340.
[15] 王斌, 李洁涛, 王佳俊, 陈鹏林, . 强降雨诱发堆积体滑坡模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 234-248.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!