岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6): 1557-1567.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1502

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

湛江结构性黏土自钻旁压试验的加载速率效应

舒荣军1, 2,孔令伟1, 2,师文卓1, 2,刘炳恒1, 2,黎澄生1, 2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-08 修回日期:2021-03-01 出版日期:2021-06-11 发布日期:2021-06-15
  • 通讯作者: 孔令伟,男,1967年生,博士,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事特殊土的力学特性与灾害防治技术方面的研究。E-mail: lwkong@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:shurongjun16@mails.ucas.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:舒荣军,男,1995年生,博士研究生,主要从事特殊土的力学特性方面的研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.41877281)

Effects of loading rate on SBPT responses of Zhanjiang structured clay

SHU Rong-jun1, 2, KONG Ling-wei1, 2, SHI Wen-zhuo1, 2, LIU Bing-heng1, 2, LI Cheng-sheng1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2020-10-08 Revised:2021-03-01 Online:2021-06-11 Published:2021-06-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41877281).

摘要: 作为一种具有高结构屈服强度的灵敏性黏土,湛江黏土力学性质的加载速率效应值得关注。为了研究湛江黏土原位力学性质的加载速率效应,开展了不同加载速率的自钻旁压试验,分析应力速率对湛江黏土原位不排水抗剪强度、线性刚度以及剪切模量非线性衰减特性的影响。结果表明:应力速率越大,不排水抗剪强度就越大,二者之间具有良好的线性关系,这一变化关系不同于文献中控制应变速率的研究结果;线性割线剪切模量Gur随应力速率的增大而增大,经相应速率下Gur归一化后的不排水抗剪强度落于较窄的数值区间内,表明应力速率对峰值强度对应的应变影响很小;加载速率越大,切线剪切模量Gt衰减幅度越大、衰减越迅速、Gt-γ衰减曲线越陡,但对于各应力速率,Gt均约在γ = 0.1%时衰减至小于Gur;加载速率影响了各应变区间内Gt的衰减幅度和速度,加载速率越小,衰减集中发生于越低的应变水平。研究指出湛江黏土特殊的微观结构是控制其力学性质加载速率效应的主导因素,并通过开展原状土样和重塑土样的室内超微型贯入试验予以初步印证。认为应当重视土体原位力学性质的加载速率效应,同时关注加载速率历史对土体蠕变性质的影响。

关键词: 结构性黏土, 自钻旁压试验, 超微型贯入试验, 速率效应, 剪切模量, G-??衰减曲线

Abstract:

The study on influence of loading rate on mechanical behavior of Zhanjiang clay, which is a kind of sensitive clay with high yield strength, could be noteworthy. In order to study the loading rate effects on intact mechanical properties of Zhanjiang clay, the self-boring pressuremeter tests (SBPT) under five different loading rates have been carried out. The influence of stress rate on undrained shear strength, linear stiffness and non-linear degradation of shear modulus of the soil have been discussed. It is shown that the greater stress rate results in higher undrained shear strength, proposing strong linear correlation between two variables, and that behaves differently from the results of tests controlling strain rate given in literature. The linear secant shear modulus Gur increases with stress rate and the undrained shear strengths varies within a class with small width after normalized by corresponding Gur, which indicates little effect caused by loading rate on the strain corresponding to the peak strength. The significant degradation of tangential shear modulus Gt, at higher gradient and the steeper Gt-γ decay curve have been observed when at higher stress rate. The value of shear strain where Gt decreases to less than Gur is about 0.1% for all stress rate conditions. The loading rate significantly affects the amplitude and the gradient of the decay of Gt in the corresponding class. The smaller the stress rate leads to the lower strain level where the decay of Gt mainly occurs. It is recognized that the special microstructure could account for the loading rate effects of Zhanjiang clay and this comment is preliminarily proved by super-mini-penetration tests conducted on both undisturbed and remolded samples. It is recommended that special attention should be paid to both the loading rate effects on in-situ mechanical properties and the influence of “loading rate history” on creep behavior of soils.

Key words: structured clay, self-boring pressuremeter test, super mini-penetration test, rate effects, shear modulus, G-? decay curves

中图分类号: TU413
[1] 尚召伟, 孔令伟, 鄢俊彪, 高志傲, 王斐, 黎澄生, . 非饱和花岗岩残积土的小应变剪切模量特性与其持水特征曲线确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1131-1140.
[2] 刘璐, 李帅学, 张鑫磊, 高洪梅, 王志华, 肖杨. 微生物加固珊瑚砂动剪切模量与阻尼比特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3410-3420.
[3] 王丽艳, 蒋飞, 庄海洋, 王炳辉, 张雷, 李明, . 考虑水化期影响的橡胶−钢渣填料动力特性与微观分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 53-62.
[4] 周恩全, 白宇航, 姚缘, 王龙, 陆建飞, . 橡胶混合黏土小应变剪切模量特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 705-713.
[5] 王盛年, 苏俊, 郭双枫, 谷雷雷, 陈泽玮, 赵凯, . 地聚物稳定粗粒填料静动力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 350-364.
[6] 赵盛男, 霍玉龙, 汤斌. 湛江组结构性黏土触变性正交试验及其触变强度预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 197-205.
[7] 陈国兴, 韩勇, 梁珂, . 徐州城区黏性土与粉土的动剪切模量与阻尼比特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 163-172.
[8] 姜德义, 杨镇宇, 范金洋, 李宗泽, 锁进杰, 陈结. 盐岩循环加卸载过程中的速率效应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 403-414.
[9] 王奕霖, 李飒, 段贵娟, 李怀亮, 赵福臣. 深海超软土动剪切模量与阻尼比特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(11): 3261-3271.
[10] 安然, 孔令伟, 师文卓, 郭爱国, 张先伟, . 结构性黏土的原位刚度衰减规律及数学表征[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 410-418.
[11] 焦钰祺, 贺林林, 梁越, 刘旭菲, . 考虑结构性黏土应变软化效应的 桩靴竖向承载特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1374-1382.
[12] 王斌, 韩幽铭, 周欣, 陈成, 张先伟, 桂蕾, . 太湖湖相黏土层剪切模量衰减特性的 原位测试研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 2031-2040.
[13] 周跃峰, 杨哲, 饶锡保, 肖国强, 周黎明. 不同含水率下黏土弹性参数的 弯曲−伸展元试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 387-393.
[14] 梁珂, 陈国兴, 杭天柱, 刘抗, 何杨, . 砂类土最大动剪切模量的新预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1963-1970.
[15] 朱楠, 刘春原, 赵献辉, 王文静, . 不同应力路径下K0固结结构性黏土 微观结构特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1899-1910.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!