岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (7): 1861-1870.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1923

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

一种新的软−硬节理峰值剪切强度模型

范祥1, 2, 3,邓志颖1,崔志猛1, 4,何忠明3,林杭5   

  1. 1. 长安大学 公路学院,陕西 西安 710064;2. 长江水利委员会长江科学院 水利部岩土力学与工程重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430010; 3. 长沙理工大学 湖南省公路先进建养技术国际科技创新合作基地,湖南 长沙 410114;4. 广州诚安路桥检测有限公司,广东 广州 510420; 5. 中南大学 资源与安全工程学院,湖南 长沙 410083
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-27 修回日期:2021-03-29 出版日期:2021-07-12 发布日期:2021-07-16
  • 通讯作者: 林杭,男,1980年生,博士,教授,主要从事边坡工程、节理力学、隧道与地下空间方面的研究工作。E-mail: linhangabc@126.com E-mail:fanxiang224@126.com
  • 作者简介:范祥,男,1986年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩体力学与隧道工程方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学青年基金项目(No. 41807241);长江水利委员会长江科学院开放研究基金资助项目(No. CKWV2019740/KY);长沙理工大学公路先进施工与维修技术湖南省国际科技创新合作基地开放基金资助项目(No. kfj190802)。

A new peak shear strength model for soft-hard joint

FAN Xiang1, 2, 3, DENG Zhi-ying1, CUI Zhi-meng1, 4, HE Zhong-ming3, LIN Hang5   

  1. 1. School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710064, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Engineering of Ministry of Water Resources, Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute of Changjiang Water Resources Commission, Wuhan, Hubei 430010, China; 3. Hunan International Scientific and Technological Innovation Cooperation Base of Advanced Construction and Maintenance Technology of Highway, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410114, China; 4. Guangzhou Cheng’an Testing Ttd. of Highway & Bridge, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510420 China; 5. School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410083, China
  • Received:2020-12-27 Revised:2021-03-29 Online:2021-07-12 Published:2021-07-16
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China for Youth (41807241), CRSRI Open Research Program (CKWV2019740/KY), the Open Fund of Hunan International Scientific and Technologies Innovation Cooperation Base of Advanced Construction and Maintainance Technology of Highway, Changsha University of Science & Technology (kfj190802).

摘要: 岩体中常存在强度不同的界面,其剪切强度影响岩体稳定,剪切强度的评估较为重要。利用3D技术打印的树脂节理板,浇注含不同粗糙度软?硬节理的不同强度水泥砂浆试样,在常法向应力下进行直剪试验和数值模拟研究,得到的剪切应力?位移的试验曲线与模拟曲线相一致。基于试验结果,引入比例系数T表征软?硬节理的组合壁面强度CCS,引入影响因子? 描述节理粗糙系数JRC、节理壁面强度JCS和法向应力?n对软?硬节理峰值剪切强度τp的综合影响效果,利用数值分析方法推导出一种估算软?硬节理峰值剪切强度的模型。试验发现:软?硬节理的残余剪切强度τr主要由JCS较低侧控制,且这种控制作用随JRC增大而增强;CCS值小的剪切应力?位移曲线率先达到峰值和进入残余阶段。研究表明:软?硬节理峰值剪切强度模型综合了JRC、JCS和?n对节理τp的影响机制,可用来评估粗糙软?硬节理的峰值剪切强度。

关键词: 软?硬节理, 直剪试验, 节理粗糙系数, 节理组合壁面强度, 峰值剪切强度模型

Abstract: Interfaces with different strengths are usually existed in rock mass, the shear strength of these interfaces plays a critical role on the stability of rock mass, and it is thus highly important to accurately evaluate their shear strength. With the help of 3D-printed resin molds, the soft-hard jointed cement specimens with different joint roughness coefficients (JRC) and joint wall compressive strengths (JCS) were fabricated to conduct laboratory tests and numerical simulation of direct shear under constant normal stress. The test curves of shear stress-displacement agree with those by numerical simulation. Based on the test results, a coefficient of proportionality T was proposed to characterize combined compressive strength CCS of soft-hard joint, and meanwhile an influence factor ? was proposed to characterize the effects of JRC, JCS and normal stress ?n on the peak shear strength of soft-hard joint by calculation and statistics method , thus a method for estimating the peak shear strength for soft-hard join surface was derived. The residual shear strength of soft-hard joint is mainly controlled by the soft joint side, and this control effect increases with the increase of JRC. The shear stress-displacement curves of soft-hard joint with smaller CCS earlier reach the peak and enter the residual stage. The study indicates that the proposed model may be used to evaluate the peak shear strength of soft-hard joint by integrating the influence mechanism of joint surface morphology, joint compressive strength and normal stress.

Key words: soft-hard joint, direct shear test, joint roughness coefficient, combined joint wall compressive strength, peak shear strength model

中图分类号: TU 451
[1] 劳国峰, 阳军生, 谢亦朋, 汤冲, 许志鹏, . 基于骨架结构指标的连续级配颗粒土峰值抗剪强度模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2459-2470.
[2] 王家全, 吴新彪, 董程锋, 张涛艺, . 基于SmartRock传感技术的含砂道砟直剪试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1060-1070.
[3] 曹勇, 余飞, 黄康, 戴张俊, 陈善雄, 张志才, . 随机生成粗糙度的岩石-混凝土界面破坏特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 315-326.
[4] 孙杰豪, 郭保华, 田世轩, 程坦, . 基于声发射特征参数的砂岩节理直剪破坏特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 167-177.
[5] 张大伟, 李昊泽, 刘飞禹, 冯忞, . 双向循环荷载作用下胶−砂粒径比对橡胶砂剪切特性影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 239-247.
[6] 孙杰豪, 郭保华, 程胜锦, 田世轩, 陈岩, . 不同控制方式和卸荷应力路径下类岩石节理剪切强度特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2061-2071.
[7] 袁伟, 李建春, 李星, . 花岗岩冲击剪切力学行为的试验及数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1675-1685.
[8] 李泽闯, 张昊, 程培峰, 王艳丽, . 含粗粒滑带土剪切带演化及空间展布规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1067-1080.
[9] 崔新壮, 姜鹏, 王艺霖, 金青, 陈璐, . 高摩阻超静定土工格栅在粗粒土夹层中的剪胀作用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 141-152.
[10] 孟秋杰, 宋宜祥, 黄达, 马文著, 钟助, 岑夺丰, . 正融冰川碎屑冰冻体剪切强度劣化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 197-212.
[11] 刘飞禹, 张诗珣, 熊勃, . 粗糙度对不同粒径砂-混凝土界面剪切特性影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 419-426.
[12] 齐添, 孔剑捷, 刘飞禹. 循环剪切对格栅−土石混合体界面特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2593-2602.
[13] 范雷, 余美万, 邬爱清, 向前. 层间错动带水力耦合抗剪强度特性演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1959-1970.
[14] 郑爽, 雍睿, 杜时贵, 何智海, 钟祯, 章莹莹, 眭素刚, . 基于纳米划痕试验的砂岩结构面宏−微观摩擦系数关系研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1022-1034.
[15] 刘飞禹, 李昊泽, 符军, 孙宏磊, . 橡胶砂级配对混合土体剪切特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 663-672.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!