岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8): 2195-2206.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0175

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

单级等速加载下高压缩性软土 非线性大应变固结解析解

仇超1,李传勋1,李红军2   

  1. 1. 江苏大学 土木工程与力学学院,江苏 镇江 212013;2. 绿地浙江事业部,浙江 杭州 310015
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-01 修回日期:2021-03-26 出版日期:2021-08-11 发布日期:2021-08-16
  • 通讯作者: 李传勋,男,1978年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程方面的教学和科研工作。E-mail: lichuanxun@yeah.net E-mail:2221823006@stmail.ujs.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:仇超,男,1995年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩土工程方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51878320)。

Analytical solutions for one-dimensional nonlinear large-strain consolidation of high compressible soil under a ramp loading

QIU Chao1, LI Chuan-xun1, LI Hong-jun2   

  1. 1. Faculty of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212013, China; 2. Zhejiang Real Estate Division, Greenland Holding Group, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310015, China
  • Received:2021-02-01 Revised:2021-03-26 Online:2021-08-11 Published:2021-08-16
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51878320).

摘要: 饱和软土大应变固结理论涉及复杂的材料非线性和几何非线性问题,致使其解析解很难获得,但非线性大应变固结模型解析解的工程意义却不言而喻。目前土体非线性压缩和渗透特性通常采用e- 和e- (e为孔隙比, 为有效应力, 为渗透系数)非线性关系描述。但大量室内固结渗透试验的结果表明,高压缩性软土发生较大应变时该非线性关系不再适用,而 - 和 - 非线性关系却能有效描述高压缩性软土的有效应力、渗透系数与孔隙比间的非线性变化规律。基于此,建立了变荷载下高压缩性软土一维非线性大应变固结模型,并给出特定参数下该固结模型的精确解析解和普适条件下固结模型的近似解析解。将应用固结模型计算的沉降曲线与室内等速加载下的试验沉降曲线对比,验证了该解析理论的可靠性。在此基础上,通过大量的计算研究参数 和 、外荷载和加荷速率对固结性状的影响。结果表明:压缩指数 一定时, 越小,土层的固结速率越快,底部超静孔压消散越快; 一定时, 越小,土层的固结速率越快, 底部超静孔压消散越快。按沉降定义的平均固结度 一般大于按孔压定义的平均固结度 ,即沉降的发展速率要快于孔 压消散速率。 ( 2) 1时,土层的沉降速率随外荷载的增加而减慢; ( 2) 1时,土层的沉降速率随外荷载的增加而加快; ( 2) 1时,土层的沉降速率与外荷载的大小无关。外荷载一定时,土层的平均固结速率随加荷速率增大而加快,同一深度处的超静孔压随加载速率增大而减小。

关键词: 高压缩性软土, 非线性, 大应变, 变荷载, 解析解

Abstract: The analytical solution for the nonlinear large strain consolidation model is significant for the actual engineering. However, since the large-strain consolidation theory of saturated soft soil involves complex material nonlinearity and geometrical nonlinearity problems, it is usually challenging to obtain an analytical solution for the large strain consolidation models. At present, the nonlinear compression and permeability characteristics of soils are usually described by e- and e- (e is the void ratio, is the effective stress, and is the permeability coefficient). However, large numbers of laboratory consolidation tests show that those nonlinear relationships are no longer suitable for the high compressibility soft soil with large strain. In contrast, the nonlinear relationships between the void ratio and effective stress as well as the void ratio and permeability coefficient of soft soil with high compressibility can be described by - and - more effectively. Therefore, in this study the one-dimensional nonlinear large strain consolidation model of the high compressible soft soil under a ramp loading is developed, and the exact analytical solution with the specific parameters and the approximate solutions under the general conditions are developed. The reliability of the proposed analytical solutions is validated by comparing the calculated settlement curve with the experimental settlement curve under a ramp loading in the laboratory. On this basis, the influences of parameters ( and ), external load, and loading rate on the consolidation behavior are investigated by numerous calculations. The results show that at a certain compression index , the smaller the , the faster the consolidation rate of the soil layer, and the faster the dissipation of the excess pore-water pressure at the bottom of the clay layer. Conversely, as is constant, the smaller the , the faster the consolidation rate of the soil layer, and the faster the dissipation of the excess pore-water pressure at the bottom of the clay layer. The average degree of consolidation in terms of settlement is generally larger than that of the consolidation accounting for the excess pore-water pressure , which means the development rate of settlement is faster than pore pressure dissipation. In addition, when ( 2) 1, the average consolidation rate decreases with the final external load increasing. When ( 2) 1, the average consolidation rate increases with the final external load increasing. When ( 2) 1, the average consolidation rate is independent of the final external load. Moreover, when the final external load is constant and the loading rate increases, the average consolidation rate increases while the excess pore-water pressure at the same depth decreases.

Key words: high compressible soil, nonlinearity, large-strain, time-dependent loading, analytical solution

中图分类号: TU 411.3
[1] 付强, 杨科, 刘钦节, 宋涛涛, 吴犇牛, 于鹏, . 交变荷载下围岩−衬砌组合结构界面强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 40-52.
[2] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[3] 刘雯, 范金洋, 刘文浩, 陈结, 刘伟, 吴斐, . 气压-应力耦合作用下盐岩应力松弛特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2434-2448.
[4] 吴兵, 盛建龙, 叶祖洋, 周新, . 单裂隙岩体非线性渗流-法向应力耦合模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2495-2504.
[5] 陈灯红, 张心瀚, 刘云辉, 胡昊文, 刘云龙, 梁羽翔, . 基于八叉树比例边界有限元法的高拱坝-不规则地基-库水系统非线性地震响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2586-2599.
[6] 张春顺, 林正鸿, 杨典森, 陈嘉瑞, . 考虑初始级配影响的粗粒土非线性弹性模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 750-760.
[7] 周航, 汪义圣, 亓戈平, . 黏弹性土中异形桩横向动力响应半解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 761-774.
[8] 王浩, 侯泓冰, 江文豪, . 考虑根系对水文特性影响下非饱和植被土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3329-3345.
[9] 张智卿, 刘鑫, 刘开富, 吴君涛, 吴文兵, . 横观各向同性土体中端承桩水平振动特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3371-3382.
[10] 孙宏磊, 徐振恺, 刘斯杰, 蔡袁强, . 考虑土柱发展过程的淤泥真空预压大应变固结计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 133-146.
[11] 田抒平, 王振钰, 张陈蓉, . 大直径单桩基础海上风机非线性共振特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 156-164.
[12] 雷国平, 吴泽雄, 苏栋, 莫烨强, 程马遥, . 考虑桩身材料非线性的微型抗滑桩计算p-y[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 337-348.
[13] 石修松, 周高涨, 刘磊磊, . 基于非线性Hvorslev面的超固结土层隧道掌子面稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2595-2610.
[14] 孙锦鑫, 卢萌盟, 刘干斌, . 高置换率散体材料桩-不透水桩组合型复合地基非线性固结解析研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2421-2436.
[15] 江学辉, 颜建伟, 罗文俊, 李佳宝, 徐长节. 纵向压力和加固钢板对隧道力学性能影响的解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1623-1632.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!