岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (11): 2919-2924.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0725

• 基础理论与实验研究 •    下一篇

饱和黏性土地基不排水条件下承载力计算方法

宋二祥1, 2,付浩1, 2,李贤杰1, 2   

  1. 1. 清华大学 土木工程系,北京 100084;2. 清华大学 土木工程安全与耐久教育部重点实验室,北京 100084
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-13 修回日期:2021-07-20 出版日期:2021-11-11 发布日期:2021-11-11
  • 作者简介:宋二祥,男,1957年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土力学及工程方面的教学及科研工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51778339);国家973计划课题(No. 2014CB047003)。

A calculation method for the bearing capacity of saturated soil under undrained conditions

SONG Er-xiang1, 2, FU Hao1, 2, LI Xian-jie1, 2   

  1. 1. Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Civil Engineering Safety and Durability of the Ministry of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • Received:2021-05-13 Revised:2021-07-20 Online:2021-11-11 Published:2021-11-11
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51778339) and the National Basic Research Program of China (2014CB047003).

摘要: 针对饱和黏性土地基在相对快速加载亦即不排水条件下的极限承载力问题,指出应采用不固结不排水强度进行计算,如采用固结不排水强度指标直接计算将给出严重偏大的结果。接着给出由中国一般地勘报告中所提供固结不排水强度指标计算不固结不排水强度的公式,由此给出近似随深度线性增大的不固结不排水强度 。进而提出此种地基极限承载力的计算方法,其基本思路是采用滑移面平均深度处的 进行计算,关键技术是构建了确定滑移面最大深度的无量纲参数,通过理论分析与数值计算拟合给出简便实用的计算公式。与有限元极限分析方法的大量计算对比表明了所给无量纲参数及承载力计算方法的正确性和高精度。

关键词: 地基承载力, 饱和黏性土, 不固结不排水强度, 固结不排水强度指标

Abstract: With regard to undrained analysis of saturated clay foundation for its ultimate bearing capacity under rapid loading, this study has proposed the calculation of the unconsolidated-undrained (UU) strength instead of employing the consolidated-undrained (CU) strength parameters directly due to overestimated results. The formula for predicting UU strength has been deducted based on the CU strength parameters referring to the reports of geological investigation, and the profile of the UU strength , found increases linearly with depth, has been built up. A calculation method for the bearing capacity of this foundation type is therefore proposed. The basic idea thereof is to use the value of at the average depth of the slip plane in the calculation, and a dimensionless parameter, which plays the key role, is introduced to determine the maximum depth of the slip surface. The accuracy and the precision of this parameter, as well as the proposed method, has been validated via a large number of comparative calculations with the finite element limit analysis method in this study.

Key words: bearing capacity of foundation, saturated clayey soil, unconsolidated-undrained strength, consolidated-undrained strength parameter

中图分类号: TU 470
[1] 杨立. 平板载荷试验数值分析及承载力判定标准研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 723-730.
[2] 杨光华, 廖汉阳, . 筏板基础下薄层土地基承载力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3405-3414.
[3] 宋二祥, 陈星屹, 林世杰. 关于偏心荷载下地基承载力的验算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 1925-1932.
[4] 袁宇, 刘润, 付登锋, 孙国栋. 结构性海洋黏土损伤模型的二次开发及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 1989-2002.
[5] 杨洲, 程晓辉, 麻强, 刘伟, 谢庄子, . 高填方地基不排水稳定性分析强度指标研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 218-226.
[6] 沈扬, 冯照雁, 邓珏, 陈锴嘉, 许俊红, . 南海珊瑚砂地基承载力模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1281-1290.
[7] 周强, 黎康平, 段亚辉, 曹子君, 李典庆, . 基于广义可靠指标相对安全率的地基承载力 安全判据研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2052-2062.
[8] 刘忠玉, 崔鹏陆, 郑占垒, 夏洋洋, 张家超. 基于非牛顿指数渗流和分数阶Merchant模型的 一维流变固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2029-2038.
[9] 王新志,王 星,刘海峰,孟庆山,朱长歧,. 珊瑚礁地基工程特性现场试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 2065-2070.
[10] 杨光华,黄致兴,姜 燕,张玉成, . 地基承载力的双控确定方法[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 232-242.
[11] 闫澍旺,陈 静,孙立强,陈 浩,朱福明,. 深厚软土地基上充灌袋围埝下沉计算研究[J]. , 2016, 37(12): 3537-3544.
[12] 秦会来 ,周同和 ,郭院成 ,杜 超,. 土钉墙地基承载力问题探讨[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 393-397.
[13] 张 蕾. 原位载荷试验确定复合地基承载力方法研究[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 240-244.
[14] 曹宇春 ,刘富玲,. 基于综合变异系数的地基承载力可靠性分析[J]. , 2014, 35(7): 1950-1956.
[15] 杨 扬,卢坤林,朱大勇. 局部剪切破坏模式下的无重地基承载力[J]. , 2014, 35(1): 232-237.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!