岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (12): 3315-3327.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0376

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

砂质土体脉动注浆浆−土耦合动力响应分析

窦金熙1, 2,张贵金1, 2,张熙1, 2,范伟中1, 2,宋伟1, 2   

  1. 1. 长沙理工大学 水利与环境工程学院,湖南 长沙 410114;2. 长沙理工大学 水沙科学与水灾害防治湖南省重点实验室,湖南 长沙 410114
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-17 修回日期:2021-07-15 出版日期:2021-12-13 发布日期:2021-12-14
  • 通讯作者: 张贵金,男,1964年生,博士,教授,主要从事水利工程新材料、水利工程安全评价和岩土工程风险分析研究。E-mail: gjzhang84@126.com E-mail:doujinx@163.com
  • 作者简介:窦金熙,男,1989年生,博士研究生,主要从事水利工程地基处理研究与数值模拟
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51279019);中国电力投资集团公司重大科技计划项目(No.2011-036-WLDKJ-X);湖南省重大水利科技项目(XSKJ2018179-32)。

Dynamic response analysis of slurry-soil coupling in sandy soil based on pulsating grouting

DOU Jin-xi1, 2, ZHANG Gui-jin1, 2, ZHANG Xi1, 2, FAN Wei-zhong1, 2, SONG Wei1, 2   

  1. 1. School of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410114, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Water-Sediment Sciences and Water Disaster Prevention of Hunan Province, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410114, China
  • Received:2021-03-17 Revised:2021-07-15 Online:2021-12-13 Published:2021-12-14
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51279019), and the Major Science and Technology Program of China Power Investment Corporation(2011-036-WLDKJ-X) and the Key Water Resources Science and Technology Project of Hunan Province(XSKJ2018179-32).

摘要: 脉动注浆作为解决松散土体注浆的新工艺,尽管已经得到一定应用,但脉动荷载作用下浆?土耦合的动力响应研究,远滞后于工程实践。基于脉动注浆原理,设计了一套脉动注浆监测响应系统,设定不同脉动周期压力和土体孔隙比,研究不同脉动周期荷载作用砂质土体的响应规律;依托COMSOL Multiphysics平台结合MATLAB,二次开发了适用于模拟脉动注浆浆?土耦合应力?应变的程序;通过物理试验对比现有注浆地层响应理论,验证了数值模拟适用性。研究结果表明:当脉动压力增大,土体的孔隙比不变时,骨架力承担脉动应力传递速率增快;脉动频率越大,土体内部应力越大;脉动压力会破坏恒载作用下土体形成的强弱力链,导致应力传递均布;土体的孔隙比越大,土体越松散,脉动频率越大对于浆液在土体内部运移越有利。脉动注浆相比于稳压注浆会导致应力区域集中,应力区域集中造成的浆液渗透与挤密注浆,有利于降低注浆过程地层抬升位移;相比稳压注浆的浆液易沿小主应力或者地层缺陷处浆液持续劈裂,脉动注浆浆液扩散更可控。数值模拟方法为不同脉动施工参数、地层条件以及注浆材料下,浆液扩散规律研究提供了新思路,研究结论可为工程实践提供较强的指导意义。

关键词: 脉动注浆, 砂质土, 动力响应, 黏土?水泥浆液, 浆?土耦合

Abstract: As a new grouting technology, pulsating grouting has been successfully applied to solve the problem of loose soil grouting. However, the dynamic response of slurry-soil coupling under pulsating load lags far behind the engineering practice. Based on the theory of pulsating grouting, a monitor system of pulsating grouting was designed. The response laws of sandy soil under different pulsating periodic loads were investigated by setting different pulsating periodic pressures and soil porosity ratios. Then through COMSOL Multiphysics platform and MATLAB, a program for simulating the stress-strain of slurry-soil coupling was developed. The applicability of numerical simulation was verified by comparing the existing grouting response theory with physical tests. The results show that when the pulsating pressure increases and the pore ratio of soil remains constant, the transfer rate of the pulsating stress borne by the skeleton force increases rapidly. The higher the pulsation frequency, the greater the soil stress. The fluctuating pressure will destroy the strong and weak force chain formed by the soil under constant load, resulting in the uniform stress transfer. The larger the pore ratio, the looser the soil and the higher the pulsation frequency, the more favorable the slurry migration in the soil. Compared with stable pressure grouting, pulsating grouting can lead to the stress concentration. Correspondingly, the slurry penetration and compaction caused by the stress concentration are beneficial to reduce the formation uplift displacement in the grouting process. Compared with stable pressure grouting, by which the grout is easy to split continuously along the small principal stress or formation defect, the grout diffusion induced by pulsating grouting is more controllable. In addition, the numerical simulation method provides a new idea for the slurry diffusion laws under different pulsating construction parameters, formation conditions and grouting materials. The research conclusions can provide a strong guiding significance for engineering practice.

Key words: pulsating grouting, sandy soil, dynamic response, clay-cement slurry, slurry-soil coupling

中图分类号: TU470
[1] 可文海, 杨文海, 李源, 吴磊, . SH波作用下斜坡地形中桩基的动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1545-1544.
[2] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[3] 谢周州, 赵炼恒, 李亮, 黄栋梁, 张子健, 周靖, . 基于振动台试验的不同含石率土-石混合体边坡地震动响应差异性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2324-2337.
[4] 李福秀, 郭文灏, 郑烨炜. 刚性墙面双面加筋土挡墙动力响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1957-1966.
[5] 朱丹, 蒋关鲁, 陈虹羽, 赵鑫辉, 黄德贵, 刘乙甫, . 单、双排桩支护路堑边坡动力响应特性的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1763-1777.
[6] 王智德, 司莹莹, 李杰, 钱梦凡, 安佳兴, . 低应变率冲击荷载下节理花岗岩的动力响应规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1755-1762.
[7] 王滢, 赵彩清, 王海萍, . 隧道内爆炸荷载作用下衬砌及周围非饱和土的动力响应解答[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1026-1038.
[8] 黄超, 钱建固, . 水锤作用下饱和地基蓄排水隧道的动力响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3802-3814.
[9] 张聪, 冯忠居, 林路宇, 周桂梅, 陈露, . 震陷场地变截面单桩动力特性与损伤评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 3037-3046.
[10] 王瑞, 胡志平. 铁路路基动力响应的2.5D有限元方法研究现状及展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 284-301.
[11] 李小信, 何超, 周顺华, 李晖, . 具有不规则界面的层状地基三维动力响应的薄层法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 655-668.
[12] 冯海洲, 蒋关鲁, 何梓雷, 郭玉丰, 胡金山, 李杰, 袁胜洋, . 预应力锚索桩板墙加固隧道洞口边坡的动力响应特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 50-62.
[13] 王志颖, 郭明珠, 曾金艳, 王晨, 刘晃. 地震作用下含软弱夹层顺层岩质斜坡 动力响应的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2566-2578.
[14] 张硕成, 陈文化. 考虑不均匀冻胀土体-衬砌隧道在寒区的振动响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1467-1476.
[15] 张聪, 冯忠居, 王富春, 孔元元, 王溪清, 马晓谦, . 强震区软弱土层差异厚度下单桩动力响应振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1100-1110.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!