岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (12): 3335-3344.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0520

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

拉剪作用下类岩石试样的力学 特性与损伤破坏机制

周超彪1,刘东2,姜清辉1   

  1. 1. 武汉大学 土木建筑工程学院,湖北 武汉 430072;2. 中国电建集团中南勘测设计研究院有限公司,湖南 长沙 410014
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-09 修回日期:2021-07-15 出版日期:2021-12-13 发布日期:2021-12-14
  • 通讯作者: 姜清辉,男,1972年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土力学数值方法的教学与研究。E-mail: jqh1972@yahoo.com.cn E-mail: 2019202100017@whu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:周超彪,男,1996年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩土力学数值方法的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51769014)。

Mechanical properties and failure mechanisms of the rocklike specimens under tension shear effects

ZHOU Chao-biao1, LIU Dong2, JING Qing-hui1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China; 2. Power China Zhongnan Engineering Corporation Limited, Changsha, Hunan 410014, China
  • Received:2021-04-09 Revised:2021-07-15 Online:2021-12-13 Published:2021-12-14
  • Supported by:
    The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51769014).

摘要: 利用自主设计的拉伸?剪切辅助装置,开展不同法向应力(?0.28~3.0 MPa)条件下的拉剪试验和压剪试验,同时利用声发射技术对比分析两者的力学特性与损伤破坏机制。研究结果表明,拉伸?剪切辅助装置能够较好地开展拉剪试验。试样的峰值应力随法向应力呈曲线变化,对法向拉应力更为敏感,Hoek-Brown强度准则总体上能够较好地表征全应力区的强度特征。拉剪试样峰后应力大幅跌落并迅速分离成两部分,与压剪试验峰后残余阶段相比,具有更多的脆性破坏特征。试样破裂面的形貌特征与法向应力的方向以及大小密切相关,压剪试样破裂面的破碎程度以及声发射参数表征的损伤程度均大于拉剪试验。相比于拉剪试样,压剪试样的破裂面摩擦区、局部剥落现象更明显。随法向应力增大,声发射平静期持续时间变长,试样进入裂纹非稳定扩展阶段的时间越晚。拉剪试验损伤过程各阶段所需时间相较于压剪试验更短,损伤破坏的速率更快。剪应力曲线临界点?cc、?ci和?cd与声发射参数可分别表征试样的宏观与微观破裂过程,?cd临界点和声发射b值可作为岩石破坏的预兆。

关键词: 拉剪试验, 强度准则, 脆性破坏, 声发射, 损伤破坏机制, 预兆

Abstract: Using self-designed tension shear auxiliary device, we carried out a tension shear test and a compression shear test under different normal stresses between ?0.28 MPa and 3.0 MPa. We applied acoustic emission to compare and analyze the mechanical properties and the damage failure mechanisms of the specimens for both tests. The main results are listed as below. The tension shear auxiliary device can help us carry out the tension-shear test well. The peak stress varies with the normal stress non-linearly and is more sensitive to the normal tensile stress. The Hoek-Brown strength criterion can generally characterize the strength of the full stress area. The post-peak stress of the specimen in tension shear test drops severely and separates into two parts rapidly, showing the failure characteristics with more brittleness than that of the compression shear test. The morphological characteristics of the fracture plane are closely related to the direction and magnitude of normal stress. For compression shear test, the damage degree represented by the acoustic emission parameters is greater, as well as the failure degree of the fracture plane, compared with those observed in tension shear test. The frictional area and the local spalling of the fracture plane are also more obvious for the specimens in compression shear test, compared with those in tension shear test. As the normal stress increases, the duration of the acoustic emission quiet period gets longer, and the start time of the unstable crack propagation gets later. Compared with the compression one, the tension shear test shows a shorter duration time for each stage of the failure process as well as a higher failure rate. The critical points ?cc, ?ci and ?cd of the shear-stress plot and the acoustic emission parameters can represent, respectively, the macroscopic and microscopic failure process of the specimen. The critical point ?cd and the acoustic emission b value can be used as omens of rock failure.

Key words: tension shear test, strength criterion, brittle failure, acoustic emission, damage failure mechanism, omen

中图分类号: TU452
[1] 张胜, 柏巍, 徐鼎平, 郑虹, 江权, 李志伟, 向天兵, . 循环荷载作用下砂岩损伤演化的声发射与电阻率监测及理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 53-66.
[2] 黄曼, 宁昊晟, 洪陈杰, 陶志刚, 刘雨星, 张贺, . 基于第二代负泊松比锚杆加固的充填结构面剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 131-140.
[3] 刘一鸣, 李振, 冯国瑞, 杨鹏, 白锦文, 黄炳雄, 李东, . 循环加卸载下裂隙砂岩声−热响应特征及前兆规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2773-2791.
[4] 雷瑞德, 顾清恒, 胡超, 贺培, 周林森, . 裂隙砂岩声发射信号特征及破裂前兆识别研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2023-2038.
[5] 储超群, 包兴佳, 毛明发, 吴顺川, 崔贺佳, . 深地灰岩三轴压缩声发射特征及破坏形式试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2049-2061.
[6] 吕萌, 王亮清, 谢妮, 朱林锋, 安彩龙, 柯睿, 王旭晨, . 加锚异性结构面剪切特性及声发射响应特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2106-2120.
[7] 马春德, 康子豪, 阳文源, 谭观霜, 赵俊康, . 不同加载速率下花岗岩多期应力记忆方向独立性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1709-1718.
[8] 唐巨鹏, 黄磊, 潘一山, 任凌冉, 张昕, 张众华, . 煤层倾角突变区煤与瓦斯突出模拟试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1719-1730.
[9] 韩世迎, 王航龙, 彭俊, 朱君星, 王林飞, 潘堃, . 结构面影响深埋隧道硬质围岩岩爆特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1765-1776.
[10] 张艳博, 周浩, 梁鹏, 姚旭龙, 陶志刚, 来有邦, . 基于到时精确拾取与智能优化算法结合的岩石声发射定位方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1643-1656.
[11] 王晓敏, 屈钧利, 师亚平. 基于自回归模型方差陡增效应的微震P波到时拾取[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1335-1342.
[12] 许庆钊, 史文豹, 常聚才, 苗壮, 闫澳运, 李传明, 齐潮. 不同加载速率含水煤样力学响应及宏微观破坏机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 881-893.
[13] 于天佑, 蒋关鲁, 饶千竺, 朱丹, 陈虹羽, 刘先峰, . 水汽循环作用下红层泥岩的损伤劣化特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 479-491.
[14] 刘剑, 周宗红, 张晶, 王春, 侯廷凯, 乔木, . 闪长岩不同卸荷速率声发射特征及非稳定阶段识别[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 225-232.
[15] 莫云, 胡新丽, 崔德山, 顾东明, 谢昭宇, 杨勇, . 砂化白云岩Hoek-Brown准则参数取值方法研究及其岩体力学参数估算[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 257-265.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!