岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1): 218-226.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0686

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

高填方地基不排水稳定性分析强度指标研究

杨洲1,程晓辉1,麻强2,刘伟2,谢庄子1   

  1. 1. 清华大学 土木工程系,北京 100084;2. 空军研究院 工程设计研究所,北京 100068
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-07 修回日期:2021-09-27 出版日期:2022-01-10 发布日期:2022-01-07
  • 通讯作者: 程晓辉,男,1971年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土和颗粒物质弹塑性力学与本构模型研究。E-mail: chengxh@tsinghua.edu.cn E-mail:yang-z18@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:杨洲,男,1997年生,博士研究生,主要从事土体本构关系及边坡工程方面的研究工作。

Study of strength indices for undrained stability analysis of high filled ground

YANG Zhou1, CHENG Xiao-hui1, MA Qiang2, LIU Wei2, XIE Zhuang-zi1   

  1. 1. Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; 2. Department of Engineering Design, Airforce Research Institute, Beijing 100068, China
  • Received:2021-05-07 Revised:2021-09-27 Online:2022-01-10 Published:2022-01-07

摘要: 目前国内工程界对高填方地基的排水稳定性关注较多,然而针对地下水位较高、排水性能较差的原状地基,由快速填筑引起的不排水稳定性问题更为突出。综述了现行规范中关于边坡不排水稳定性分析的相关条文及国内外常用方法。通过分析总应力摩擦角的应力路径相关性以及计算原状地基典型点位的总应力加载路径,解释了采用三轴固结不排水(consolidated-undrained,简称CU)总应力强度指标进行不排水分析,会高估高填方地基的不排水稳定性,该方法存在理论缺陷和工程隐患。以简单假想边坡模型和某高填方机场实际工程为算例,利用简化Bishop法,选用5种不排水分析指标或模型,分别计算其不排水稳定性安全系数。结果表明:CU总应力法会高估高填方地基的不排水稳定性;其余4种方法计算得到的不排水稳定性安全系数比较接近,相对适用。

关键词: 高填方地基, 固结不排水强度指标, 有效应力强度指标, 不排水抗剪强度, 有效固结应力法, MCC模型

Abstract: Domestic geotechnical engineers paid more attention to the drained stability of high filled ground; however, the undrained stability brought by rapid constructions was more of a problem for ground with a high groundwater level and poor drainage performances. The relevant standards existing in current specifications and the common methods about undrained stability analysis of slopes were reviewed. By analyzing the relationship between total stress friction angles and stress paths and by calculating the typical total stress paths of original ground in high-fill projects, an explanation was given why the undrained stability of high filled ground was overestimated when strength indexes of total stress from consolidated-undrained (CU) triaxial tests were applied to undrained analysis, which brought theoretical defects and engineering hidden dangers. Taking a simple hypothetical slope model and a real case of a proposed high-fill airport as example, the factors of safety (FOS) of the undrained stability were calculated through five undrained analysis parameters or models using simplified Bishop method respectively. The results show that the undrained stability of high filled ground is overestimated by the CU total stress method all the time; the FOS of undrained stability by other four methods are close, which verifies the relative applicability of these methods.

Key words: high filled ground, consolidated-undrained strength index, effective stress strength index, undrained shear strength, effective consolidation stress method, MCC model

中图分类号: TU 248.6;TU 470
[1] 王军, 张凯宇, 陈晟凯, 秦伟, 倪俊峰, 高紫阳, 张一帆, . 爆破挤淤法中炸药埋深对土体参数影响的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 123-132.
[2] 刘吉福. 排水固结堤坝稳定分析新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 106-114.
[3] 肖涵, 董超强, 章荣军, 陆展, 郑俊杰. 生石灰对理化复合法处理淤泥浆效率的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 214-222.
[4] 郑威威, 洪义, 王立忠, . 含气软黏土的不排水抗剪强度计算模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(8): 2233-2240.
[5] 王斌, 韩幽铭, 周欣, 陈成, 张先伟, 桂蕾, . 太湖湖相黏土层剪切模量衰减特性的 原位测试研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 2031-2040.
[6] 宋二祥, 付浩, 李贤杰, . 饱和黏性土地基不排水条件下承载力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(11): 2919-2924.
[7] 詹良通, 孙倩倩, 郭晓刚, 陈锐, 陈云敏, . 花岗岩风化料弃土快速堆填过程中 不排水抗剪强度评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 50-58.
[8] 瑜璐, 杨庆, 杨钢, 张金利. 塑性极限分析鱼雷锚锚尖贯入阻力[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1953-1962.
[9] 邱 敏, 袁 青, 李长俊, 肖超超, . 基于孔穴扩张理论的黏土不排水抗剪强度 计算方法对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1059-1066.
[10] 周建, 蔡露, 罗凌晖, 应宏伟, . 各向异性软土基坑抗隆起稳定极限平衡分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4848-4856.
[11] 杜伟飞, 郑建国, 刘争宏, 张继文, 于永堂, . 黄土高填方地基沉降规律及排气条件影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 325-331.
[12] 蒋水华,曾绍慧,杨建华,姚 池,黄劲松,周创兵,. 不排水抗剪强度非平稳随机场模拟及边坡可靠度分析[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1071-1081.
[13] 王 进,朱泽奇,陈 健,付晓东,房 强, . 海相沉积软土的自钻式旁压试验及原位力学特性[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 195-202.
[14] 刘美麟,房 倩,张顶立,侯艳娟. 深基坑内撑式支护结构综合刚度研究[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 2059-2064.
[15] 闫澍旺,李 嘉,林 澍,孙立强, . 考虑土体强度增长的黏性土地基承载力分析[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 629-634.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!