岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2): 327-336.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0135

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

生石灰激发GGBS固化高含水率香港海相 沉积物的物理力学性质研究

蔡光华1, 2, 3,周伊帆2,潘智生2,李江山3   

  1. 1. 南京林业大学 土木工程学院,江苏 南京 210037;2. 香港理工大学 土木与环境工程系,香港 九龙; 3. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-18 修回日期:2021-11-04 出版日期:2022-02-11 发布日期:2022-02-22
  • 通讯作者: 李江山,男,1987年生,博士,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事环境岩土和固废资源化等方面的研究。E-mail: jsli@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:ghcai@njfu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:蔡光华,男,1985年生,博士(后),副教授,主要从事环境岩土、固废资源化再利用等方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金委员会与香港研究资助局联合科研资助基金(No. N_PolyU511/18);国家自然科学基金(No. 41902286, No. 51861165104);岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室开放基金课题(No. Z09026)。

Physical and mechanical performance of quicklime-activated GGBS stabilized Hong Kong marine sediment at high water content

CAI Guang-hua1, 2, 3, ZHOU Yi-fan2, POON Chi Sun2, LI Jiang-shan3   

  1. 1. College of Civil and Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210037, China; 2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China
  • Received:2021-08-18 Revised:2021-11-04 Online:2022-02-11 Published:2022-02-22
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China/Hong Kong Research Grants Council Joint Research Scheme (N_PolyU511/18), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41902286, 51861165104) and the Open Fund for State Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Mechanics and Engineering (Z019026).

摘要: 海相沉积物处置已成为一项全球范围的挑战。在传统固化/稳定化方法中,环境污染严重的波兰特水泥(PC)是一种被广泛使用的固化剂。在此背景下,一种环境友好型的固化剂(生石灰与粒化高炉矿渣(简称GGBS)的混合料)取代PC来用在土壤改良领域。使用生石灰激发GGBS固化处理高含水率海相沉积物,并与PC固化海相沉积物进行比较。通过物理、化学试验及无侧限抗压强度试验分析了生石灰-GGBS固化海相沉积物的物理、化学和强度特性。结果表明:与PC固化海相沉积物相比,生石灰-GGBS固化沉积物具有体积收缩大、含水率低和密度略高的物理特性。随着生石灰比例的降低和养护时间的延长,生石灰-GGBS固化沉积物的pH值逐渐降低。生石灰-GGBS固化沉积物的无侧限抗压强度呈先增大(生石灰:固化剂为0.05~0.15)后减小(生石灰:固化剂为0.15~0.3)再增大(生石灰:固化剂为0.3~0.4)的趋势;当生石灰与固化剂的比值为0.15及0.4时,强度达到最大值;当生石灰与固化剂的比值为0.15时,生石灰-GGBS固化沉积物达到的峰值强度是相同条件下PC固化沉积物强度的1.4倍。该研究结果证实了GGBS与少量生石灰组合可以替代PC来固化高含水率的天然沉积物。

关键词: 海洋沉积物, 生石灰, 粒化高炉矿渣(GGBS), 生石灰-固化剂比, 力学性能

Abstract: The treatment of marine sediment has been a global-scale challenge. Portland cement (PC) is widely-used binder in the conventional stabilization/solidification method. Use of PC can cause serious environmental pollution. In this context, the environment-friendly binder (blend of quicklime and ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS)) has been adopted to replace PC in the soil remediation field. This study investigated the quicklime-activated GGBS for the stabilization of marine sediment at high water content. The physicochemical and unconfined compression measurements were performed to analyze the physical, chemical, and strength characteristics of the quicklime-GGBS stabilized sediments. The results were compared with that of PC-stabilized sediment. As compared to the PC-stabilized sediment, the quicklime-GGBS stabilized sediment would generate larger volume shrinkage, lower water content, and slightly higher density. With reducing quicklime proportion and continuing curing time, the pH of the quicklime-GGBS stabilized sediment gradually decreases. The unconfined compressive strength of the lime-GGBS stabilized sediment shows a trend of first increasing (quicklime-binder ratio of 0.05–0.15) and then decreasing (0.15–0.3) and finally increasing again (0.3–0.4). The maximum strengths appear at the quicklime-binder ratios of 0.15 and 0.4. The maximum strength at the quicklime-binder ratio of 0.15 is 1.4 times than the corresponding PC-stabilized sediment under the same condition. The findings indicate that the combination of GGBS with little quicklime has the potential to replace PC for stabilizing natural sediment at high water content.

Key words: marine sediment, quicklime, ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS), quicklime-binder ratio, mechanical performance

中图分类号: TU 43
[1] 张春瑞, 纪洪广, 付桢, 张月征, 宋宇, 田竹华, 范文博, . 白云石对粉砂岩物理力学性质影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2661-2675.
[2] 祁凯, 万志辉, 戴国亮, 胡涛, 周峰, 张鹏, . 基于不同注浆材料固化钙质砂的力学性能试验及微观机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1825-1838.
[3] 郑舒文, 刘松玉, 李迪, 童立元, 吴恺, . 膨胀土基泡沫轻质土力学性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1455-1465.
[4] 唐先习, 张徐军, 李昊杰, . 钢渣-煤矸石地聚合物固化黄土的力学特性评价与固化原理分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1205-1214.
[5] 陶高梁, 周恒洁, 肖衡林, 周宏豫, . 新型边坡防护生态基材的力学-植生性能与抗冲刷效果研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3018-3032.
[6] 刘鹏, 曹源兴, 程钰, 白云波, . 碳酸酐酶增强微生物矿化固土效果的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2554-2564.
[7] 徐文彬, 赵康奇, 张亚伦, 刘成保, 周磊, . 调控层胶结充填体三轴压缩力学性能及破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3658-3667.
[8] 田威, 王肖辉, 云伟, 程续. 基于不同后处理方法的砂型3D打印类岩石试样力学性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1330-1340.
[9] 骆赵刚, 丁选明, 欧强, 蒋春勇, 方华强, . 土工格栅加筋珊瑚砂的强度及变形特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1053-1064.
[10] 肖涵, 董超强, 章荣军, 陆展, 郑俊杰. 生石灰对理化复合法处理淤泥浆效率的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 214-222.
[11] 侯永强, 尹升华, 杨世兴, 张敏哲, 刘洪斌, . 动态荷载下胶结充填体力学响应及能量 损伤演化过程研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 145-156.
[12] 李敏, 于禾苗, 杜红普, 曹保宇, 柴寿喜, . 冻融循环对二灰和改性聚乙烯醇 固化盐渍土力学性能的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(2): 489-498.
[13] 李艳, 程禹翰, 翟越, 魏盛宇, 杨宇冰, 赵瑞峰, 梁文彪, . 高温后花岗岩微观结构演化特性与 动态力学性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(12): 3316-3326.
[14] 熊仲明, 吕世鸿, 李运良, 赵奇峰, 李进, 谭书舜, 张向荣, 朱玉荣, 姜磊, 杨琪凡, 张宁波, 张子栋. 被动围压下黄土动态力学性能与能量耗散研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 775-782.
[15] 田威, 王震, 张丽, 余宸, . 高温作用后3D打印岩体试样力学性能初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 961-969.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!