岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2): 466-478.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1072

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

吸力式沉箱底部土体循环特性 及其等效循环蠕变模型研究

朱文波1, 2,戴国亮1, 2,王博臣1, 2,龚维明1, 2,孙捷3,胡皓3   

  1. 1. 东南大学 混凝土及预应力混凝土结构教育重点实验室,江苏 南京 211189; 2. 东南大学 土木工程学院,江苏 南京 211189;3. 华能国际电力江苏能源开发有限公司清洁能源分公司,江苏 南京 210003
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-15 修回日期:2021-11-12 出版日期:2022-02-11 发布日期:2022-02-22
  • 通讯作者: 戴国亮,男,1975年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,长期从事地下结构工程方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: daigl@seu.edu.cn E-mail:230169390@seu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:朱文波,男,1990年生,博士,博士后,长期从事海洋岩土以及地下结构方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 52078128,No. 51878160,No. 51678145);中国华能集团有限公司科技项目(No. HNKJ19-H17)

Study on cyclic characteristics and equivalent cyclic creep model of the soft clay at the bottom of suction caisson foundation

ZHU Wen-bo1, 2, DAI Guo-liang1, 2, WANG Bo-chen1, 2, GONG Wei-ming1, 2, SUN Jie3, HU Hao3   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structure of Ministry of Education, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211189, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211189, China; 3. Huaneng International Power Jiangsu Energy Development Co., Ltd. Clean Energy Branch, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210003, China
  • Received:2021-07-15 Revised:2021-11-12 Online:2022-02-11 Published:2022-02-22
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52078128, 51878160, 51678145) and the Science and Technology Project of China Huaneng Group Co., Ltd (HNKJ19-H17).

摘要: 吸力式沉箱基础作为张力腿平台(TLP)的锚固基础,其底部土体不仅存在轴向卸荷作用,而且还存在循环荷载作用。现有研究很少涉及在卸荷条件下进行的软黏土循环累积变形研究。因此,通过循环三轴试验研究了轴向卸荷条件下软黏土的应变累积变形及应变软化特性。试验结果表明:在低静偏应力以及动偏应力条件下,土体应变累积及软化程度较低;随着动偏应力增加,循环累积变形逐渐变大且前期发展较快后期趋于稳定,同时应变软化程度逐渐增大;土体循环累积变形随动偏应力提高而增大,其循环累积应变曲线呈衰减-稳定的蠕变特性。在试验基础上,提出与静偏应力和动偏应力有关的软化系数公式。构建了考虑软化系数与静偏应力、动偏应力等条件下软黏土等效循环蠕变模型。将该模型推广至三维,并开发了有限元子程序。建立了循环荷载作用下吸力式沉箱基础循环抗拔承载力有限元分析法,将其用于吸力式沉箱基础循环累积变形分析中,并与沉箱模型循环试验结果进行了对比验证。

关键词: 吸力式沉箱基础, 软黏土, 应变软化, 累积变形, 等效循环蠕变模型, 有限元

Abstract: As the anchoring foundation of the tension leg platform (TLP), suction caisson foundation is not only subjected to the vertical pullout load but also subjected to the cyclic load. However, there are few studies on the mechanism of the cyclic characteristics of soft clay under unloading condition. In this study, the cyclic triaxial tests under axial unloading were carried out to obtain the cyclic cumulative deformation and strain softening characteristics of soft clay. The results show that the degree of strain accumulation and softening coefficient were low under the condition of low static deviator stress and dynamic deviator stress. With the increase of dynamic deviator stress, the cumulative cyclic deformation gradually increased and rapidly developed in the early stage and tended to be stable in the late stage. Meanwhile, the softening of soil gradually increased. The cyclic cumulative deformation of soil increased with the increase of dynamic deviator stress, and the cyclic cumulative strain curve showed attenuation-stability creeping characteristics. Based on the tests, a formula for softening coefficient related to static deviator stress and dynamic deviator stress was introduced to describe the test results of soft clay under different stress levels. Considering the influence of static deviator stress, dynamic deviator stress and softening coefficient, an equivalent cyclic creep model of soft clay was established. On this basis, a three-dimensional equivalent cyclic creep model was built, and a finite element subroutine was developed. The finite element method for cyclic uplift capacity of caisson was established to analyze the cyclic cumulative deformation of soil. It was verified by comparing with the test results.

Key words: suction caisson foundation, soft clay, strain softening, cumulative deformation, equivalent cyclic creep model, finite element

中图分类号: TU 411
[1] 张宪成, 池宝涛, 于先泽, 郭前建, 袁伟, 张耀明, . 面向近场有限元法的非结构网格划分及其断裂损伤分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 467-476.
[2] 聂耀武, 胡兵, 顾雷雨, 李槟, 周全超, 李文辉, 李琦, 李霞颖, . 二氧化碳地质封存协同上覆煤矿开采的安全风险评估数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 491-506.
[3] 张弛, 邓龙传, 庄欠伟, 李晓昭, 王秋平, 乔梁, . 基于试验和数值模拟的滚刀旋转破岩受力和效率研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2995-3006.
[4] 陈灯红, 张心瀚, 刘云辉, 胡昊文, 刘云龙, 梁羽翔, . 基于八叉树比例边界有限元法的高拱坝-不规则地基-库水系统非线性地震响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2586-2599.
[5] 吴嘉园, 王华宁, 宋飞, 胡韬, 蒋明镜, . 考虑能源土软化特性及钻采全过程的井壁稳定半解析模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2121-2134.
[6] 李林, 张等红, 张淼, 顾晓强, 徐龙飞, . 考虑水-力耦合的桩-非饱和黄土接触面荷载传递模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1343-1355.
[7] 周鹏发, 申玉生, 高登, 张熙, 黄海峰, 高波, . 基于混合有限元的显式时域完美匹配层研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1605-1619.
[8] 张佩, 杨承儒, 侯世伟, 杜修力, . 基于内聚力单元的土石混合体细观数值方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1620-1631.
[9] 周波翰, 张文利, 王栋. 球形贯入仪预测超固结土强度的数值研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1303-1309.
[10] 武孝天, 姚仰平, 魏然, 崔文杰. 基于统一硬化模型的隧道施工引发土体变形数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 1013-1024.
[11] 邵国建, 毛泽辉, 苏宇宸, 焦泓程, 吕亚茹. 钙质砂透射系数探究:波形耦合作用及梯度提升预测方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3661-3672.
[12] 娄旭龙, 张泽瑞, 孔德琼, 陈星潮, 朱斌, . 深海重型管道管土相互作用大变形极限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3234-3242.
[13] 何颖, 陈雅, 尹奔驰, 刘中宪, 刘旭, . 频率相关等效线性山谷交错场地多点地震动模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3280-3288.
[14] 张瑨, 李书恒, 朱其志, 石玲玲, 邵建富, . 基于深度学习的岩石短长期本构模型及灰砂岩变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 289-302.
[15] 韩枥兵, 李文涛, 韦昌富, . 自适应时间步长法在非饱和渗流中的应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 685-693.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!