岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (3): 799-807.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0696

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于镜像法的隧道地表沉降时间效应计算方法

李鹏飞1,勾宝亮1,朱萌2,高晓静1,郭彩霞1   

  1. 1. 北京工业大学 城市与工程安全减灾省部共建教育部重点实验室,北京 100124;2. 中铁十九局集团轨道交通工程有限公司,北京 101399
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-08 修回日期:2021-12-14 出版日期:2022-03-22 发布日期:2022-03-23
  • 作者简介:李鹏飞,男,1983年生,博士,教授,主要从事隧道工程等方面的教学和研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51778025,No.51978019);北京市教委科研计划项目资助(No.KM201710005019)。

A calculation method of the time-dependent behavior for tunneling-induced ground settlement based on virtual image technique

LI Peng-fei1, GOU Bao-liang1, ZHU Meng2, GAO Xiao-jing1, GUO Cai-xia1   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering, Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China; 2. China Railway 19 Bureau Group Rail Traffic Engineering Co. Ltd., Beijing 101399, China
  • Received:2021-05-08 Revised:2021-12-14 Online:2022-03-22 Published:2022-03-23
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51778025,51978019) and the Scientific Research Program of Beijing Municipal Education Commission (KM201710005019).

摘要: 随着国内各城市地下道路建设的不断发展,地下开挖引起周围结构损坏甚至塌陷的事故时有发生,因此,合理地预测地表沉降对于保护地面建(构)筑物具有重要意义。将地表沉降速度系数与三维镜像法相结合,建立了考虑时间效应的隧道地表沉降计算方法,并以深圳某地铁区间隧道为例,通过与现场监测数据进行对比分析,验证了该方法的合理性,并利用该方法进一步分析了隧道停止施工时地表横、纵向沉降随时间的变化规律,通过参数分析明确了地表沉降量与地表沉降速度的时间效应。研究结果表明:地表沉降量与地表纵向沉降最大斜率随停工时间的增加逐渐增大并最终趋于稳定;地表最大沉降速度随开挖速度与沉降速度系数的增大呈对数型函数增长,但地表最终沉降量受二者的影响较小;地表最终沉降量和地表最大沉降速度随地层损失量的增大而线性增大;地表最大沉降速度出现的时间与地层损失的大小无关。

关键词: 隧道工程, 地表沉降, 时间效应, 镜像法, 沉降速度系数

Abstract: With the continuous development of the underground road construction in various cities in China, accidents including damage or even collapse of the surrounding structures can often happen due to the underground excavation. Therefore, it is very importannt to predict reasonably the ground settlement for the protection of ground buildings and structures. We combine the ground settlement velocity coefficiennt with the three-dimensional imaging method, and establish a new calculation method for the tunnel surface settlement considering the time effect. We take a subway tunnel in Shenzhen as an example, and demonstrate the rationality of the method by comparing it with the on-site monitorinng data. This method is then used to further analyze the variation of the ground lateral and longitudinal settlement with time during the tunnel shutdown, and the time dependencies of the ground settlement and the settlement velocity are studied through a parameter analysis. The results show that the ground settlement and the maximum slope of the longitudinal settlement increase gradually with the increase of shutdown time and eventually tend to be stable. The maximum ground settlement velocity increases following a logarithmic function with the increase of the excavation speed and the settlement velocity coefficient. In contrast, the final ground settlement is less affected by those two factors. The final ground settlement and the maximum ground settlement velocity both increase linearly with the increase of the ground loss. The time at which the ground settlement velocity reaches its maximum has nothing to do with the amount of the ground loss.

Key words: tunnel construction, ground surface settlement, time effect, virtual image technique, settlement velocity coefficient

中图分类号: U451
[1] 江学辉, 颜建伟, 罗文俊, 李佳宝, 徐长节. 纵向压力和加固钢板对隧道力学性能影响的解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1623-1632.
[2] 潘秋景, 吴洪涛, 张子龙, 宋克志, . 基于多域物理信息神经网络的复合地层隧道掘进地表沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 539-551.
[3] 张佳威, 崔臻, 张翔宇, 曹俊, . 高地应力环境下跨活断层隧道抗错断铰接设计试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3333-3344.
[4] 周晓敏, 马文著, 张松, 宋宜祥, 刘勇, 和晓楠, . 渗流条件下隧道锚注复合围岩体的解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 206-220.
[5] 曾召田, 张瀚彬, 邵捷昇, 车东泽, 吕海波, 梁珍, . MX-80膨润土高温老化时间效应的细微观分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 145-153.
[6] 孙闯, 兰思琦, 陶琦, 关喜彬, 韩希平, . 深埋隧道软弱围岩拱顶三维渐进性塌落机制上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2471-2484.
[7] 张硕成, 陈文化. 考虑不均匀冻胀土体-衬砌隧道在寒区的振动响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1467-1476.
[8] 张亮亮, 程桦, 姚直书, 王晓健, . 基于改进Knothe时间模型的地表最大沉降速度预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1111-1119.
[9] 谢家冲, 黄昕, 金国龙, 张子新, . 局部水力交互下盾构隧道渗流与力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1179-1189.
[10] 阮永芬, 张虔, 乔文件, 裴利华, 闫明, 郭宇航, . 基于C-V-T模型的盾构穿越既有桥梁施工风险评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 552-562.
[11] 崔光耀, 麻建飞, 宁茂权, 唐再兴, 刘顺水, 田宇航, . 超大矩形顶管盾构隧道近接下穿高铁施工 加固方案对比分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 414-424.
[12] 董建华, 徐斌, 吴晓磊, 连博, . 隧道分级让压支护作用下围岩 弹塑性变形全过程解析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(8): 2123-2135.
[13] 张治国, 叶铜, 张成平, PAN Y T, 吴钟腾, . Stokes二阶波作用下斜坡海床中盾构隧道周围 砂土渗流压力响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(6): 1635-1659.
[14] 袁帅, 冯德旺, 张森豪, 邢运鹏, 柯尊启, . 考虑水力参数空间变异性的盾构 隧道开挖面稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11): 3153-3162.
[15] 宋战平, 郭德赛, 徐甜, 华伟雄, . 基于非线性模糊层次分析法的TBM 施工风险评价模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1424-1433.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!