岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4): 1083-1092.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1138

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

超深地连墙槽壁侧压力演变模式 及其施工扰动分析

乔亚飞1, 2,唐洁1, 2,顾贇3,丁文其1, 2   

  1. 1. 同济大学 土木工程学院 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092;2. 同济大学 岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092; 3. 上海城投水务工程项目管理公司,上海 200002
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-25 修回日期:2021-09-18 出版日期:2022-04-15 发布日期:2022-04-18
  • 通讯作者: 丁文其,男,1969年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事隧道及地下工程的教学与科研工作。E-mail: Dingwq@tongji.edu.cn E-mail: yafei.qiao@tongji.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:乔亚飞,男,1990年生,博士,助理研究员,主要从事岩土力学及隧道工程方面的科研工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金重大项目(No. 52090083);上海市晨光计划(No. 20CG26);上海市苏州河深隧项目横向课题。

Evolution mode of lateral pressure on the trench wall and disturbance analysis during construction of super-deep diaphragm wall

QIAO Ya-fei1, 2, TANG Jie1, 2, GU Yun3, DING Wen-qi1, 2   

  1. 1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 3. Engineering Project Management Company, Shanghai Chengtou Water Group, Shanghai 200002, China
  • Received:2021-07-25 Revised:2021-09-18 Online:2022-04-15 Published:2022-04-18
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Major Research Plan of National Natural Science Foundation of China (52090083), the Shanghai Chenguang Program (20CG26) and the Consulting Project on Shanghai Deep Tunnel Project.

摘要: 地连墙施工扰动的精细分析对预测基坑开挖的环境影响十分重要,尤其是超深基坑。因此,收集分析了某102 m超深地连墙施工过程中的泥浆压力和混凝土压力现场实测数据,总结了槽壁侧压力的演变规律和竖向分布模式,提出了混凝土浇筑过程中槽壁侧压力的三折线模型并验证。三折线模型可以再现槽壁侧压力先增大后减小的趋势,并可退化为双折线模型。最后采用三折线模型建立了精细化数值模型,模拟了百米地连墙的成槽开挖及混凝土浇筑过程,分析了连续墙施工对槽段周围土体应力与变形的影响,并将计算结果与双折线模型结果进行了对比。结果表明:超深地下连续墙施工会引起周围土体的应力重分布,其影响范围在沿槽段方向为1.6倍槽段长度,在垂直槽段方向为4.3倍槽段长度;土体应力重分布有沿竖向和水平向传递两种机制,且以水平向传递为主。在上海软土地区,地下连续墙混凝土的浇筑会对槽壁产生挤压作用,引起槽段体积增大,进而导致混凝土浇筑量的增大。

关键词: 超深地连墙, 槽壁侧压力, 现场监测, 数值分析, 施工扰动

Abstract: The detailed analysis of disturbance induced by diaphragm wall construction plays an important role in predicting the environmental influence of deep excavations, especially the super-deep excavation. Therefore, this paper collected and analyzed the field data of slurry pressure and concrete pressure during the construction of a 102 m super-deep diaphragm wall. The evolution law and vertical distribution mode of the lateral pressure on the trench wall during the construction were summarized, followed by a new proposed tri-line model of lateral pressure on the trench wall and its validation. The proposed tri-line model can well capture the first increase and then decrease trend of the lateral pressure on the trench, and it can return to the classic bi-line model. Finally, the fine numerical simulation of the construction process of a 102 m diaphragm wall, including the trenching and concreting, was performed adopting both the tri-line model and bi-line model. The stress state and deformation of soils around the trench were analyzed and compared. The results revealed that the construction of super-deep diaphragm walls can lead to the stress redistribution of adjacent soil. The effect zone is about 1.6D (D is the panel length) along the panel direction and about 4.3D perpendicular to the panel. The stress redistribution is controlled by vertical and horizontal transfer mechanisms, and the horizontal transfer mechanism dominates. In Shanghai soft soil area, the concreting would compress the trench wall and increase the trench volume, causing the increase of concrete volume.

Key words: super-deep diaphragm wall, lateral pressure on the trench, field monitoring, numerical simulation, construction disturbance

中图分类号: TU 47
[1] 邓其宁, 崔玉龙, 王炯超, 郑俊, 许冲, . 三维边坡稳定性计算的ChatGPT辅助编程方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 322-334.
[2] 李培楠, 刘学, 戴泽余, 翟一欣, 张弛, 寇晓勇, 范杰, 甄亮, 王长虹, . 曲线顶管底幕法水下沉船打捞顶推力计算模型与施工扰动分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 403-418.
[3] 陈怀林, 杨涛, 饶云康, 张哲, 吴红刚, 谢江伟, 滕汉卿. 基于分段式滑面应力测试系统的滑面应力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3562-3573.
[4] 曾二贤, 程述一, 伍林伟, 陈成, 吏垚, 刘观仕, . 土-岩组合地基变截面锚杆承载性能与机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2117-2128.
[5] 胡利文, 洪义, 王德咏, . 水下双面真空预压离心模型试验及数值模拟分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 3059-3070.
[6] 蒋凡, 刘华, 岳青, 杨文爽. 超大沉井基础取土下沉刃脚土压力变化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 431-442.
[7] Muhammad Usman Azhar, 周 辉, 杨凡杰, 高阳, 朱勇, 路新景, 房后国, 耿轶君, . 软弱泥质砂岩地层中输水隧洞稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 626-639.
[8] 李双龙, 魏丽敏, 冯胜洋, 何群, 张开鑫, . 基于扩展Koppejan模型的被动桩−软土 时效性相互作用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2602-2614.
[9] 汪嘉钰, 刘润, 姬永红, 杨旭, 陈广思, 王晓磊, . 筒型基础水平向和抗倾承载力的极限分析上限解[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(3): 777-788.
[10] 江帅, 朱勇, 栗青, 周辉, 涂洪亮, 杨凡杰, . 隧道开挖地表沉降动态预测及影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 195-204.
[11] 蔡灿, 张沛, 孙明光, 杨迎新, 谢松, 蒲治成, 杨显鹏, 高超, 谭政博, . 油气钻井中的分离式冲击−切削复合破岩机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2535-2544.
[12] 张建聪, 江权, 郝宪杰, 丰光亮, 李邵军, 汪志林, 樊启祥, . 高应力下柱状节理玄武岩应力−结 构型塌方机制分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2556-2568.
[13] 赵志强, 戴福初, 闵弘, 谭晔, . 原状黄土−古土壤中水分入渗过程研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2611-2621.
[14] 庄妍, 李劭邦, 崔晓艳, 董晓强, 王康宇, . 高铁荷载下桩承式路基动力响应及土拱效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 3119-3130.
[15] 盛建龙, 韩云飞, 叶祖洋, 程爱平, 黄诗冰, . 粗糙裂隙水、气两相流相对渗透系数模型与数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1048-1055.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!