岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5): 1187-1196.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1470

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

变荷载下长排水体-短不排水桩 复合地基固结解析解

杨涛1,吉映竹2   

  1. 1. 上海理工大学 土木工程系,上海 200093;2. 上海市建工设计研究总院有限公司,上海 200030
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-31 修回日期:2022-01-17 出版日期:2022-05-11 发布日期:2022-05-02
  • 作者简介:杨涛,男,1962年生,博士,教授,主要从事地基加固技术与复合地基理论研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研究发展计划(No.2016YFC0802405)。

Analytical solution for consolidation of composite foundation with long vertical drains and short impervious columns under time-dependent loading

YANG Tao1, JI Ying-zhu2   

  1. 1. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China; 2. Shanghai Construction Design and Research Institute Co., Ltd., Shanghai, 200030, China
  • Received:2021-08-31 Revised:2022-01-17 Online:2022-05-11 Published:2022-05-02
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Program on Key Research Project of China (2016YFC0802405).

摘要: 基于向内径向渗流的轴对称固结模型,给出了变荷载下长排水体-短不排水桩组合型复合地基的固结方程,在单面排水条件下推导出组合型复合地基的固结解析解,包括排水体和排水体周边土体中的超静孔隙水压力解答和组合型复合地基整体平均固结度解答。将组合型复合地基固结度解析解与三维有限元数值解进行了比较,证明了解析解的合理性。利用固结度解析解对影响组合型复合地基固结速率的主要因素进行了分析,研究了组合型复合地基的固结特性。结果表明:组合型复合地基的固结速率随着短不排水桩贯入比的增加而逐渐增大,随排水体的井阻和其周边涂抹区厚度的增加而减小。短不排水桩刚度和置换率的变化对组合型复合地基固结速率的影响较小。

关键词: 组合型复合地基, 固结, 解析解, 不排水桩, 排水体

Abstract: Based on the axisymmetric consolidation model with the inward radial flow in the soil around a vertical drain, the consolidation equations of the composite ground with long vertical drains and short impervious columns under time-dependent loading were presented. The analytical solutions for consolidation of this combined composite foundation were derived under the single-sided drainage condition, including the solutions for the excess pore water pressures within the vertical drain and the surrounding soil, and for the overall average consolidation degree of the composite foundation. The rationalities of the proposed solutions were verified by 3D FEM simulations. The main influencing factors were analyzed using the proposed solutions, and the consolidation characteristics of the combined composite ground were also investigated. The results show that the consolidation rate of the combined composite foundation increases gradually with the increasing penetration ratio of the short impervious columns and decreases with the increases in the well resistance and the thickness of the smear zone. The variations in the stiffness and replacement ratio of the short impervious columns have less effect on the consolidation rate of the composite foundation.

Key words: combined composite foundation, consolidation, analytical solution, impervious column, vertical drain

中图分类号: TU 473
[1] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[2] 鲍树峰, 董志良, 莫海鸿, 张劲文, 于立婷, 刘攀, 刘晓强, 侯明勋, . 浮泥−流泥静态间歇沉降与低压固结沉降计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2763-2772.
[3] 杨爱武, 程姝晓, 梁振振, 华谦谦, 杨少朋. 高含水率吹填土大变形固结与流变叠加效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1977-1987.
[4] 倪睿思, 肖世国, 吴兵, 梁瑶, . 基于非线性井阻的饱和软弱土无砂增压式真空预压分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2160-2172.
[5] 周波翰, 张文利, 王栋. 球形贯入仪预测超固结土强度的数值研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1303-1309.
[6] 周航, 汪义圣, 亓戈平, . 黏弹性土中异形桩横向动力响应半解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 761-774.
[7] 金磊, 李晶晶, 李新明, 孙翰卿, . 柔性边界的有限差分法−离散元法模拟及其对砂土三轴固结排水和不排水剪切特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 980-990.
[8] 徐斌, 陈柯好, 庞锐, . 超固结黏土的剪胀方程及边界面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 449-456.
[9] FARHAD Jamil, 曾长女, 马媛, SHARAFAT Ali. 初始固结角度对饱和粉质土应变发展的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 527-538.
[10] 王浩, 侯泓冰, 江文豪, . 考虑根系对水文特性影响下非饱和植被土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3329-3345.
[11] 张智卿, 刘鑫, 刘开富, 吴君涛, 吴文兵, . 横观各向同性土体中端承桩水平振动特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3371-3382.
[12] 詹润涛, 尹晓萌, . 利用时空变化的孔隙水压力测量数据识别固结模型参数[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3315-3328.
[13] 孙宏磊, 徐振恺, 刘斯杰, 蔡袁强, . 考虑土柱发展过程的淤泥真空预压大应变固结计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 133-146.
[14] 许宝龙, 卢萌盟, 刘元杰, 张鑫岩. 多元排水体复合地基固结解析模型和解答[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 73-83.
[15] 刘吉福. 排水固结堤坝稳定分析新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 106-114.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!