岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6): 1434-1440.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1512

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

下卧基岩黏弹性地基上刚性条形基础 竖向振动响应研究

郑长杰1, 2,何育泽1, 2,丁选明3,栾鲁宝4,陈业伟5   

  1. 1. 福建工程学院 土木工程学院,福建 福州 350118;2. 福建工程学院 福建省土木工程新技术与信息化重点实验室,福建 福州 350118; 3. 重庆大学 山地城镇建设与新技术教育部重点实验室,重庆 400045;4. 中国海洋大学 工程学院,山东 青岛 266100; 5. 中建四局建设发展有限公司,福建 厦门 361000
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-06 修回日期:2022-03-02 出版日期:2022-06-21 发布日期:2022-06-29
  • 通讯作者: 栾鲁宝,男,1989年生,博士,博士后,主要从事桩基力学方面的研究。E-mail: luanlub@163.com E-mail:zcj@fjut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:郑长杰,男,1989年生,博士,教授,主要从事桩基静动力特性、土动力学与地震工程等方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    山地城镇建设与新技术教育部重点实验室开放基金(LNTCCMA-20220108);国家自然科学基金(No.52178318,No.52008059)

Vertical vibration response of rigid strip footings on a viscoelastic soil layer overlying bedrock

ZHENG Chang-jie1, 2, HE Yu-ze1, 2, DING Xuan-ming3, LUAN Lu-bao4, CHEN Ye-wei5   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Fujian University of Technology, Fuzhou, Fujian 350118, China; 2. Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology and Informatization in Civil Engineering, Fujian University of Technology, Fuzhou, Fujian 350118, China; 3. Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area of Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 4. College of Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, Shandong 266100, China; 5. Construction & Development Co., Ltd. of China Construction Fourth Bureau, Xiamen, Fujian 361000, China
  • Received:2021-09-06 Revised:2022-03-02 Online:2022-06-21 Published:2022-06-29
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Open Fund of Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area of Ministry of Education (LNTCCMA-20220108) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52178318, 52008059).

摘要: 考虑地基土层厚度的影响,对黏弹性地基上刚性条形基础承受竖向荷载下的动力响应问题进行了理论研究。通过Fourier积分变换求解了地基土的动力控制方程,并结合基底和地基的混合边界条件及土层刚性基岩边界条件,得到了刚性条形基础的对偶积分方程。通过Jacobi正交多项式将其转化为线性方程组并进行数值求解。将所得解退化至弹性半空间,并与已有文献进行了对比,验证了解析解的合理性。分析结果表明:地基土层厚度是影响地基振动产生的表面波衰减以及条形基础动力柔度系数变化的重要因素。通过数值算例发现,只有在土层厚度超过基底宽度大约50倍的情况下,现有的将地基土视为无限半空间的理论解才是合理的。

关键词: 条形基础, 动力响应, 竖向振动, 土?结构相互作用

Abstract: Considering the influence of soil thickness, the vertical vibration response of rigid strip footings on viscoelastic soil is theoretically investigated. Based on the assumptions for footing and foundation with rigid bedrock boundary condition, employing the method of Fourier transform, this mixed-boundary value problem is expressed as a pair of dual integral equations, which are transformed to a set of linear equations by means of Jacobi orthogonal polynomials and solved numerically. The solution in this study is compared with the solution of elastic half-space in the literature to verify its rationality. The results demonstrate that the attenuation of ground waves generated by the vibration of the footing, as well as the variation in dynamic compliance coefficient of the foundation, is sensitive to the thickness of the foundation soil layer. The numerical results suggest that considering the foundation soil as infinite half-space, as in existing solutions, is reasonable only in cases where the thickness of the top soil layer exceeds approximately fifty times the width of the footing.

Key words: strip footing, dynamic response, vertical vibration, soil-structure interaction

中图分类号: TU470
[1] 可文海, 杨文海, 李源, 吴磊, . SH波作用下斜坡地形中桩基的动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1545-1544.
[2] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[3] 谢周州, 赵炼恒, 李亮, 黄栋梁, 张子健, 周靖, . 基于振动台试验的不同含石率土-石混合体边坡地震动响应差异性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2324-2337.
[4] 李福秀, 郭文灏, 郑烨炜. 刚性墙面双面加筋土挡墙动力响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1957-1966.
[5] 王智德, 司莹莹, 李杰, 钱梦凡, 安佳兴, . 低应变率冲击荷载下节理花岗岩的动力响应规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1755-1762.
[6] 朱丹, 蒋关鲁, 陈虹羽, 赵鑫辉, 黄德贵, 刘乙甫, . 单、双排桩支护路堑边坡动力响应特性的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1763-1777.
[7] 王滢, 赵彩清, 王海萍, . 隧道内爆炸荷载作用下衬砌及周围非饱和土的动力响应解答[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1026-1038.
[8] 黄超, 钱建固, . 水锤作用下饱和地基蓄排水隧道的动力响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3802-3814.
[9] 张聪, 冯忠居, 林路宇, 周桂梅, 陈露, . 震陷场地变截面单桩动力特性与损伤评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 3037-3046.
[10] 王瑞, 胡志平. 铁路路基动力响应的2.5D有限元方法研究现状及展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 284-301.
[11] 冯海洲, 蒋关鲁, 何梓雷, 郭玉丰, 胡金山, 李杰, 袁胜洋, . 预应力锚索桩板墙加固隧道洞口边坡的动力响应特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 50-62.
[12] 李小信, 何超, 周顺华, 李晖, . 具有不规则界面的层状地基三维动力响应的薄层法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 655-668.
[13] 王志颖, 郭明珠, 曾金艳, 王晨, 刘晃. 地震作用下含软弱夹层顺层岩质斜坡 动力响应的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2566-2578.
[14] 张硕成, 陈文化. 考虑不均匀冻胀土体-衬砌隧道在寒区的振动响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1467-1476.
[15] 张聪, 冯忠居, 王富春, 孔元元, 王溪清, 马晓谦, . 强震区软弱土层差异厚度下单桩动力响应振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1100-1110.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!