岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (S1): 410-418.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1358

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

结构性黏土的原位刚度衰减规律及数学表征

安然1, 2,孔令伟1, 3,师文卓1, 3,郭爱国1, 3,张先伟1, 3   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 武汉科技大学 城市建设学院,湖北 武汉 430081; 3. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-18 修回日期:2021-09-14 出版日期:2022-06-30 发布日期:2022-07-15
  • 通讯作者: 孔令伟,男,1967年生,博士,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事特殊土的力学特性与灾害防治技术方面的研究。E-mail: lwkong@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:anran@wust.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:安然,男,1992年生,博士,讲师,硕士生导师,主要从事特殊土土力学与环境土工程特性方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.41877281,No.12102312,No.41972285)。

In-situ stiffness decay characteristics and its numerical descriptions of structured clays

AN Ran1, 2, KONG Ling-wei1, 3, SHI Wen-zhuo1, 3, GUO Ai-guo1, 3, ZHANG Xian-wei1, 3   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. School of Urban Construction, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430081, China; 3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
  • Received:2021-08-18 Revised:2021-09-14 Online:2022-06-30 Published:2022-07-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41877281, 12102312, 41972285).

摘要: 湛江组黏土作为一种高强度、高灵敏度的结构性土,其力学特性易受取样扰动的影响。通过在典型结构性黏土地层中开展自钻旁压试验(SBPT)和地震扁铲试验(SDMT),获取了土体原位剪切模量−剪应变衰减曲线(G-g 曲线),并采用Stokoe模型表征其归一化刚度衰减性状。结果表明:通过SDMT测得的地震波波速Vs计算了小应变剪切模量G0,基于SBPT结果的非线性分析推导出土体的切线剪切模量Gt,结合G0Gt进而获取了完整的原位刚度衰减曲线;不同深度处的土体原位剪切模量G随剪应变g 增加均呈双曲线形的衰减规律,证明结构性黏土的力学性能具有非线性特征;随着土层深度增加,结构性黏土的原位刚度参数在g ≤10−3%条件下呈增大趋势,在g >1%条件下几乎不变;归一化的原位G-g 曲线与Stokoe模型计算结果基本吻合,说明采用Stokoe模型能够准确、合理地描述土体原位刚度衰减特征。该研究可为湛江组黏土地层的岩土工程建设提供设计参数,也可为类似地层的刚度分析提供参考。

关键词: 结构性黏土, 刚度衰减特征, 剪切模量, 原位试验, Stokoe模型

Abstract:

The Zhanjiang clay is a typical structured soil with high strength and sensitivity, and its mechanical properties are easily affected by sampling disturbance. Based on the self-boring pressuremeter tests (SBPT) and seismic dilatometer tests (SDMT) in the typical structured clay stratum, the in-situ stiffness decay curves are obtained. Furthermore, the Stokoe model is used to describe the normalized stiffness decay behaviors. Results show that the in-situ stiffness decay curve can be obtained by combining the tangential shear modulus Gt from SBPT with the small-strain shear modulus G0 from seismic wave velocity Vs calculated by SDMT. The in-situ stiffness decay curves of structured clays at different depths have a declined trend with a hyperbolic type with the increasing strain levels, which proves that the mechanical properties of structured clays exhibit nonlinear characteristics. With the increase of depth, the in-situ stiffness parameters tend to increase under the condition of shear strain less than 10−3%, while they almost remain unchanged when the shear strain is larger than 1%. The normalized G-g decay curves obtained from the in-situ tests are in good agreement with the fitting curves from the Stokoe model, indicating that the numerical model could accurately describe the in-situ stiffness decay characteristics of structured clays. This study provides the design parameters for geotechnical engineering constructions of structured clays in Zhanjiang and an important reference for similar formations.

Key words: structured clay, stiffness decay characteristics, shear modulus, in-situ test, Stokoe model

中图分类号: TU442
[1] 尚召伟, 孔令伟, 鄢俊彪, 高志傲, 王斐, 黎澄生, . 非饱和花岗岩残积土的小应变剪切模量特性与其持水特征曲线确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1131-1140.
[2] 刘璐, 李帅学, 张鑫磊, 高洪梅, 王志华, 肖杨. 微生物加固珊瑚砂动剪切模量与阻尼比特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3410-3420.
[3] 王丽艳, 蒋飞, 庄海洋, 王炳辉, 张雷, 李明, . 考虑水化期影响的橡胶−钢渣填料动力特性与微观分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 53-62.
[4] 余云燕, 丁小刚, 马丽娜, 崔文豪, 杜乾中. 微膨胀泥岩地基原位水分入渗响应特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 647-658.
[5] 周恩全, 白宇航, 姚缘, 王龙, 陆建飞, . 橡胶混合黏土小应变剪切模量特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 705-713.
[6] 王盛年, 苏俊, 郭双枫, 谷雷雷, 陈泽玮, 赵凯, . 地聚物稳定粗粒填料静动力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 350-364.
[7] 赵盛男, 霍玉龙, 汤斌. 湛江组结构性黏土触变性正交试验及其触变强度预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 197-205.
[8] 陈国兴, 韩勇, 梁珂, . 徐州城区黏性土与粉土的动剪切模量与阻尼比特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 163-172.
[9] 李波, 唐孟雄, 胡贺松, 刘春林, 凌造, 苏定立, 侯振坤. 随钻跟管桩钻孔卸荷与后注浆效应的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1044-1052.
[10] 郭景琢, 郑刚, 赵林嵩, 潘军, 张宗俊, 周强, 程雪松, . 多排孔注浆引起土体变形与孔压规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 896-907.
[11] 王奕霖, 李飒, 段贵娟, 李怀亮, 赵福臣. 深海超软土动剪切模量与阻尼比特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(11): 3261-3271.
[12] 焦钰祺, 贺林林, 梁越, 刘旭菲, . 考虑结构性黏土应变软化效应的 桩靴竖向承载特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1374-1382.
[13] 王斌, 韩幽铭, 周欣, 陈成, 张先伟, 桂蕾, . 太湖湖相黏土层剪切模量衰减特性的 原位测试研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 2031-2040.
[14] 舒荣军, 孔令伟, 师文卓, 刘炳恒, 黎澄生, . 湛江结构性黏土自钻旁压试验的加载速率效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1557-1567.
[15] 侯振坤, 唐孟雄, 胡贺松, 黎剑华, 张树文, 徐晓斌, 刘春林, . 随钻跟管桩竖向承载性能原位试验 与室内物理模拟试验对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 419-429.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!