岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (S1): 431-442.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1817

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于附加应力扩散效应的新型预应力路堤 稳定性分析

徐方1, 2,张期树1,冷伍明1, 2,邓志龙1,董俊利1,刘思慧1   

  1. 1. 中南大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410075;2. 中南大学 高速铁路建造技术国家工程实验室,湖南 长沙 410075
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-29 修回日期:2022-04-28 出版日期:2022-06-30 发布日期:2022-07-15
  • 通讯作者: 张期树,男,1993年生,博士研究生,主要从事铁路路基加固技术方面的研究。E-mail: 174801020@csu.edu.cn E-mail:fangxu@csu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:徐方,男,1986年生,博士,讲师,主要从事路基工程、边坡工程及地基与基础方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51978672,No.51709284,No.51678572)

Stability analysis of a newly developed prestressed embankment based on the additional stress propagation effect

XU Fang1, 2, ZHANG Qi-shu1, LENG Wu-ming1, 2, DENG Zhi-long1, DONG Jun-li1, LIU Si-hui1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410075, China; 2. National Engineering Laboratory for High Speed Railway Construction, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410075, China
  • Received:2021-10-29 Revised:2022-04-28 Online:2022-06-30 Published:2022-07-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51978672, 51709284, 51678572).

摘要: 稳定性分析是路堤设计中的关键环节。针对新型预应力路堤,提出一种基于极限平衡状态计算其边坡安全系数的新方法。该方法主要包含滑动面附加应力计算法与等效条间力计算法。基于弹性理论近似推导预应力路堤内潜在滑动面上的附加应力解析公式,并通过应力状态分析得到滑动面上任一点处的法向和切向附加应力计算式。结合滑动面附加应力计算法、条分法及等效条间力计算法,并考虑铁路路基受荷特点,提出新型预应力路堤稳定性分析的极限平衡法。该方法适用于任意形状滑裂面,计算公式简便,且分析过程无需迭代试算。算例分析表明:预应力在路堤潜在滑动面上引起的附加应力并非全部起抗滑作用,局部小区域存在促滑效应。相较于传统极限平衡法对预压应力的处理方式,提出的方法考虑了预应力的连续扩散效应,所得安全系数偏于安全。最后,采用数值方法进一步论证了方法的可靠性。

关键词: 预应力路堤, 稳定性, 极限平衡法, 附加应力, 条间力

Abstract: Stability analysis is essential in the design of an embankment. A new limit equilibrium based method is proposed to calculate the factor of safety of a newly developed prestressed embankment. It consists of an analytical method for computing additional stresses on a sliding surface and a method for calculating inter-slice forces. First, analytical formulas are derived to approximately calculate the additional stress components on a potential sliding surface using the elastic theory, and the additional normal and shear stresses at any point of the sliding surface are obtained based on stress state analyses. Then, a limit equilibrium method combining the additional stress calculation method, slice method, inter-slice force calculation method, and the loading characteristics of railway subgrades is proposed to analyze the stability of a prestressed embankment. The proposed method is applicable to arbitrary shaped sliding surfaces, the calculation formulas are concise, and the analysis process does not need iteration trial calculations. Example analyses demonstrate that the additional stresses on the potential slip surface of an embankment resulted by the prestress are not all anti-slide, and there are sliding effects in small local areas. Compared with the traditional limit equilibrium method on treating the compressive prestress, the proposed method considers the continuous propagation effects of the prestress, and the analyzed safety factor is biased towards safety. Finally, numerical methods are used to further demonstrate the reliability of the proposed method.

Key words: prestressed embankment, stability, limit equilibrium method, additional stress, inter-slice force

中图分类号: TU413.6+2
[1] 邓其宁, 崔玉龙, 王炯超, 郑俊, 许冲, . 三维边坡稳定性计算的ChatGPT辅助编程方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 322-334.
[2] 冯德銮, 余洋, 梁仕华. 碱激发地聚物固化滨海软土的强度和水稳定性研究进展与评述[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 13-39.
[3] 徐全, 侯靖, 杨剑, 杨昕光, 倪绍虎, 陈鑫. 基于合成岩体技术的岩质边坡稳定性精细化分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2062-2070.
[4] 李邵军, 张世殊, 李永红, 柳秀洋, 李治国, 徐鼎平, 程丽娟, 江权, 汤大明, 陈刚, . 双江口水电站极高应力大型地下厂房硬岩破坏机制与稳定性控制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1581-1594.
[5] 刘祥宁, 张文杰, . 酸性干湿循环下铬污染土固化体浸出行为研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1196-1204.
[6] 曹虎, 张广清, 李世远, 汪文瑞, 谢彭旭, 孙伟, 李帅, . 基于断裂过程区的压裂驱油水力裂缝 扩展模型及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 798-810.
[7] 孙文超, 王君豪, 徐文杰, 董晓阳, 任禾, 王洪兵, 张学杰, 王恒威, . 基于物质点法的高速公路弃渣场稳定性及 灾害动力学分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 991-1000.
[8] 邓东平, 徐润冬, 彭一航, 文莎莎. 强度空间非均质性与各向异性特征下边坡稳定性极限平衡滑面应力法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 55-72.
[9] 钱法桥, 邓亚虹, 慕焕东, 杨楠, 刘凡, 王梦晨, . 基于小波变换和拟动力法的边坡地震稳定性评价方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 88-96.
[10] 郭晓刚, 马垒, 张超, 淦树成, 王华, 甘一雄, 周通, . 软弱基底排土场边坡逆排堆高速率及稳定性控制方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 596-606.
[11] 魏星, 陈睿, 程世涛, 朱明, 王子健, . 成都膨胀土地区深基坑降雨稳定性分析与变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 525-534.
[12] 林滨强, 章德生, 简文彬, 豆红强, 王浩, 樊秀峰, . 风驱雨作用下植被斜坡稳定性响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2765-2774.
[13] 冯世进, 徐熠, 杨俊毅, 郑奇腾, 张晓磊, . 基于集对-组合赋权的填埋场失稳风险评价方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2129-2139.
[14] 何梓雷, 蒋关鲁, 冯海洲, 陈虹羽, 郭玉丰, 何晓龙, 李杰, . 基于变形的降雨后地震基覆型边坡劣化特性与机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1789-1802.
[15] 黄佳佳, 蒋明镜, 王华宁, . 中国南海神狐海域水合物储层井壁稳定可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1505-1516.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!