岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (7): 2015-2024.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1677

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑土体动力特征参数相关性的工程场地 随机地震反应分析

钟紫蓝,史跃波,李锦强,赵 密,杜修力   

  1. 北京工业大学 城市与工程安全减灾教育部重点实验室,北京 100124
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-04 修回日期:2022-03-28 出版日期:2022-07-26 发布日期:2022-08-05
  • 通讯作者: 赵密,男,1980年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事土?结构相互作用研究。E-mail: zhaomi@bjut.edu.cn E-mail: zilanzhong@bjut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:钟紫蓝,男,1986年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事地下结构抗震研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 51978020);国家自然科学基金联合基金项目(No. U1839201);广东省地震工程与应用技术重点实验室开放基金项目(No. 2017B030314068)

Stochastic seismic response analysis of engineering site considering correlations of critical soil dynamic parameters

ZHONG Zi-lan, SHI Yue-bo, LI Jin-qiang, ZHAO Mi, DU Xiu-li   

  1. Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing university of technology, Beijing 100124, China
  • Received:2021-10-04 Revised:2022-03-28 Online:2022-07-26 Published:2022-08-05
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (51978020), the Joint Funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1839201), the Open Research Fund Program of Guangdong Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Application Technology (Guangzhou University) (2017B030314068).

摘要: 研究等效线性化方法中土体动力参数不确定性对场地地震反应的影响,提出了可考虑土体动力特征参数间相关性的土体动剪切模量和动阻尼曲线随机样本生成方法,基于Matlab开发一维等效线性化场地地震反应分析计算程序,用于开展场地地震反应随机动力分析。以Ⅱ类成层场地为例建立一维自由场分析模型,采用不同地震设防水准下露头基岩场地加速度反应谱为目标反应谱,合成人工地震记录折半后作为场地下卧基岩处的输入。计算结果表明,考虑土体动力特征参数不确定性对场地地震反应具有较大的影响,且影响程度与地震动强度、频谱成分及场地基本周期均密切相关;场地最大峰值加速度和地表加速度反应谱的波动范围随地震动强度等级的增加而变大,且最大峰值应变和最大峰值加速度的波动范围可达10%和14%;目标反应谱平台段及场地基本周期处对应的场地地表加速度反应谱的波动范围超过20%。

关键词: 场地地震反应分析, 土体动力参数, 不确定性, 相关性, 等效线性化

Abstract: This paper presents a method to generate random samples of soil dynamic shear modulus and dynamic damping curves with full consideration of the correlations of critical soil dynamic parameters to investigate the influence of their uncertainties on the engineering site seismic response in the implementation of equivalent linearization method. A one-dimensional (1D) equivalent linear site seismic response analysis program, which serves stochastic dynamic response analysis of the engineering site, has been developed in MATLAB. A 1D free field model for the typical layered engineering sites of site class II is established in this study. The target response spectra, which are defined with spectra of the outcrop corresponding to different earthquake return periods based on the acceleration response, are employed to generate artificial seismic records. These records are scaled down by ½ and referred to as input motions at the engineering bedrock for the 1D free field model. The numerical results show that the uncertainties of the critical soil dynamic parameters has significant influence on seismic response of engineering sites, which are highly related to the amplitude and the frequency aspects of the input ground motions as well as the fundamental periods of the engineering sites. The variations of the peak shear strain and the peak ground acceleration of the site, which reach 10% and 14%, respectively, increase with the amplitudes of the input ground motions. Besides, the variations of acceleration response spectra corresponding to the plateaus of the target response spectra and the fundamental periods of engineering sites exceeds 20% with the consideration of the uncertainties of soil dynamic parameters.

Key words: site seismic response analysis, soil dynamic parameters, uncertainty, correlation, equivalent linear method

中图分类号: TU 441
[1] 杨智勇, 丁宇超, 冷振东, 刘志军, 黎学优, . 基于大数据融合技术的稀疏测量场地三维概率化重构[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1881-1896.
[2] 冯世进, 陈佳卓, 高梦雯, 张晓磊, 吴强, 肖钰, . 软土地区在产企业污染监测及预警方法研究:基于时移高密度电法的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1323-1334.
[3] 何颖, 陈雅, 尹奔驰, 刘中宪, 刘旭, . 频率相关等效线性山谷交错场地多点地震动模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3280-3288.
[4] 张化进, 吴顺川, 李兵磊, 赵宇松, . 基于高斯过程回归的岩石抗剪强度参数不确定性估测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 415-423.
[5] 薛阳, 苗发盛, 吴益平, 温韬, 王艳昆, . 土体本构模型参数的不确定性评估研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2797-2807.
[6] 赵迎宵, 何伟鹏, 丁晓英, 詹俊, 胡夏嵩, 刘昌义, 缪晓星, 王延秀, 卢海静, 邢光延, 李华坦, 张培豪、. 西宁盆地黄土区草本植物边坡电阻率与土体物理力学性质关系研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 477-488.
[7] 刘成禹, 许枝钰, 吴昌宇, 张向向, 郑健, . 自然条件下石窟岩石裂缝宽度的变化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 3105-3116.
[8] 张正哲, 贾科敏, 许成顺, 潘汝江. 倾斜液化场地−桩基−结构体系在近场脉冲与非脉冲地震动下地震响应差异分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3629-3638.
[9] 黄献文, 姚直书, 蔡海兵, 李凯奇, 唐楚轩, . 基于微观结构重塑的非饱和冻土导热系数预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 193-205.
[10] 杨智勇, 尹城川, 聂家岩, 黎学优, 祁小辉, . 考虑场地多源勘测数据三维空间相关性的土体 参数概率密度函数估计[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(6): 1571-1584.
[11] 李艳, 程禹翰, 翟越, 魏盛宇, 杨宇冰, 赵瑞峰, 梁文彪, . 高温后花岗岩微观结构演化特性与 动态力学性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(12): 3316-3326.
[12] 周永强, 盛谦, 李娜娜, 付晓东, . 非一致性地震动作用下某长大隧洞动力响应的 时空效应初步研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2287-2297.
[13] 田密, 盛小涛, . 岩土工程最小勘探数据量确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 400-408.
[14] 刘斯宏, 沈超敏, 毛航宇, 孙 屹. 堆石料状态相关弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2891-2898.
[15] 陈卓识, 袁晓铭, 孙锐, 王克. 土层剪切波速不确定性对场地刚性判断的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2748-2754.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!