岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (8): 2287-2295.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1578

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

边坡岩土体抗剪强度的逆向迭代修正反演方法

江巍1, 2, 3,欧阳晔1,闫金洲1,王志俭1,刘立鹏3   

  1. 1. 三峡大学 三峡库区地质灾害教育部重点实验室,湖北 宜昌 443002;2. 三峡大学 土木与建筑学院,湖北 宜昌 443002; 3. 中国水利水电科学研究院 流域水循环模拟与调控国家重点实验室,北京 100038
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-17 修回日期:2022-03-03 出版日期:2022-08-11 发布日期:2022-08-19
  • 作者简介:江巍,男,1981年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程数值分析方法方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 52079070);流域水循环模拟与调控国家重点实验室开放基金(No. IWHR-SKL-202020);三峡库区地质灾害教育部重点实验室开放基金(No. 2020KDZ10)。

Inversion iterative correction method for estimating shear strength of rock and soil mass in slope engineering

JIANG Wei1, 2, 3, OUYANG Ye1, YAN Jin-zhou1, WANG Zhi-jian1, LIU Li-peng3   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Geological Hazards on Three Gorges Reservoir Area of Ministry of Education, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China
  • Received:2021-09-17 Revised:2022-03-03 Online:2022-08-11 Published:2022-08-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52079070), the Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin (IWHR-SKL-202020) and the Open Research Fund of Key Laboratory of Geological Hazards on Three Gorges Reservoir Area of Ministry of Education (2020KDZ10).

摘要: 针对已滑动或有明显变形的边坡,取定稳定系数值进行反演分析是确定岩土体抗剪强度的重要手段。当边坡滑动面穿越多层岩土体时,盲目地抗剪强度试算反演明显不合理。为解决此问题,构造以多层岩土体抗剪强度为输入,以GeoSlope计算得到的稳定系数、滑面剪入口和剪出口位置为输出的BP神经网络,基于取定的稳定系数和现场测定的滑动面剪入口和剪出口位置,通过重复执行“逆向反推-误差校验-样本修正”实现岩土体抗剪强度的逆向迭代修正反演。工程实例验证结果表明,该方法获取的岩土体抗剪强度基本合理,可供小型边坡防护工程设计参考。该方法成功地规避了BP神经网络以已知信息为输入、以待反演参数为输出的传统做法在解决该问题时为欠定的局限性,对样本库样本数量的要求降低且具有较好精度。

关键词: 边坡防护, 神经网络, 参数反演, 逆向迭代, 欠定问题

Abstract:

For slopes that has failed or deformed significantly, the shear strength of rock and soil mass is frequently inversely estimated based on a factor of safety assumed. For the slope with a sliding surface passing through multi-layer rock and soil mass, it is unreasonable to achieve this goal by trial and error. To solve this issue, back propagation (BP) neural network is constructed using shear strength of multi-layer rock and soil mass as the input and the factor of safety of the slope, and the entry and exit positions of the sliding surface obtained by GeoSlope as the outputs. Then, based on the assumed factor of safety and the entry and exit positions measured in site, the shear strength is acquired by carrying out the “reverse back analysis-error check-sample correction” procedure repeatedly. The result of a case study verifies that the shear strength obtained by this method is reasonable and can be used as a reference when designing prevention measures for small-scale slopes. BP neural network usually considers the known information as the input, and the information to be determined as the output, which will induce a mathematical underdetermined problem when solving this issue. The proposed method avoids this demerit successfully, and has a lower requirement on the number of samples in the library and a higher precision compared to the classical BP neural network.

Key words: slope prevention, neural network, parameter inversion, reverse iteration, underdetermined problems

中图分类号: TU 452
[1] 郭旭辉, 朱鸿鹄, 吴冰, 高宇新, 胡乐乐, 曹鼎峰, . 基于人工神经网络的黄土含水率光纤被动感测技术研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 653-664.
[2] 龚囱, 戚燕顺, 缪浩杰, 肖琦, 熊良锋, 曾鹏, 赵奎, . 考虑裂纹分形维数的平行黏结模型细观参数标定的神经网络模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 327-336.
[3] 魏星, 陈睿, 程世涛, 朱明, 王子健, . 成都膨胀土地区深基坑降雨稳定性分析与变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 525-534.
[4] 李涛, 舒佳军, 王彦龙, 陈前. 基于模态分解方法的深基坑支护桩水平变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 496-506.
[5] 龙潇, 孙锐, 郑桐, . 基于卷积神经网络的液化预测模型及可解释性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2741-2753.
[6] 潘秋景, 吴洪涛, 张子龙, 宋克志, . 基于多域物理信息神经网络的复合地层隧道掘进地表沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 539-551.
[7] 李林, 左林龙, 胡涛涛, 宋博恺, . 基于孔压静力触探试验测试数据的原位固结系数物理信息神经网络反演方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 2889-2899.
[8] 虞洪, 陈晓斌, 易利琴, 邱俊, 顾正浩, 赵辉, . 软土修正剑桥模型参数反演及其应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(11): 3318-3326.
[9] 王才进, 武猛, 杨洋, 蔡国军, 刘松玉, 何欢, 常建新. 基于生物地理优化的人工神经网络模型预测 软土的固结系数[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 3022-3030.
[10] 姜宇航, 王伟, 邹丽芳, 王如宾, 刘世藩, 段雪雷, . 基于粒子群−变分模态分解、非线性自回归神经网络与门控循环单元的滑坡位移动态预测模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 601-612.
[11] 朱旻, 陈湘生, 张国涛, 庞小朝, 苏栋, 刘继强, . 花岗岩残积土硬化土模型参数反演及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 1061-1072.
[12] 闫长斌, 汪鹤健, 杨继华, 陈馈, 周建军, 郭卫新, . 利用PLSR-DNN耦合模型预测TBM净掘进速率[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 519-528.
[13] 房昱纬, 吴振君, 盛谦, 汤华, 梁栋才, . 基于超前钻探测试的隧道地层智能识别方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2494-2503.
[14] 韩建文, 刘宝, 王飞, 杨明雨, 陶明安. 高速铁路硅藻土路基工程现场综合试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(12): 4063-4072.
[15] 许婧璟, 唐旭海, 刘泉声, 冯禹菲. 基于能量跟踪法研究岩石破碎 对滚石运动轨迹的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 541-548.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!