岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (10): 2757-2767.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.2090

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

描述饱和黏性土应变软化的弹塑性双面模型

张涛,李涛,冯硕   

  1. 北京交通大学 土木建筑工程学院,北京 100044
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-10 修回日期:2022-06-29 出版日期:2022-10-19 发布日期:2022-10-17
  • 通讯作者: 李涛,男,1960年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事隧道与地下工程、环境岩土工程方面的研究工作。E-mail: taoli@bjtu.edu.cn E-mail:19115050@bjtu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:张涛,女,1992年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土本构模型方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 51878035)。

Elastoplastic two-surface model for describing strain-softening behavior of saturated cohesive soils

ZHANG Tao, LI Tao, FENG Shuo   

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
  • Received:2021-12-10 Revised:2022-06-29 Online:2022-10-19 Published:2022-10-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (51878035).

摘要: 常规三轴压缩试验中具有较强结构性的黏性土在围压较低时其应力−应变关系会呈现应变软化现象,一般还伴有塑性变形,通常土体内部结构损伤是应变软化产生的主要原因。考虑到采用经典塑性理论描述材料的应变软化不仅会违背 Drucker 的稳定性假设,而且也不能描述卸载塑性。因此,基于修正剑桥模型及 Li 和 Meissner 提出的塑性硬化准则,建立了一个描述饱和黏性土不排水应变软化的弹塑性双面模型。该模型以应力−应变曲线的峰值点分界,将应变硬化和应变软化分别作为独立的加载事件进行分析,同时引入新的结构性参数表征剪切过程中土体结构损伤导致的塑性刚度衰退。对不同固结状态饱和结构性黏土的三轴固结不排水压缩试验结果的模拟表明,所建模型能够较好地描述饱和黏性土的不排水应变软化特性。

关键词: 结构性土, 应变软化, 塑性硬化准则, 弹塑性模型, 不排水剪切

Abstract: In the conventional triaxial compression test, the stress-strain relationship of strong structured cohesive soils under a low confining pressure will show strain softening and is usually accompanied by plastic deformation. Generally, the internal structure damage of soil is the main cause of strain softening. Using classical plastic theory to describe the strain softening characteristics of materials may violate the Drucker's stability hypothesis, and cannot describe the plastic deformation during unloading. Based on the modified Cam-clay model and the plastic hardening rule proposed by Li and Meissner, an elastoplastic two-surface model is established. This model divides the stress-strain curve into strain hardening stage and strain softening stage at the peak stress point and the divided two stages are analyzed as independent loading events respectively. Meanwhile, a new structural parameter is proposed to characterize the degradation of plastic stiffness caused by soil structure damage during loading. Additionally, the comparisons between simulated and measured results of saturated structural clay in different consolidation states indicate that the model can describe the stress-strain curves and stress path curves with high accuracy and can give reasonable and good simulations of strain softening of structured clays in undrained condition.

Key words: structured soil, strain softening, plastic hardening rule, elastoplastic model, undrained shearing

中图分类号: TU 442
[1] 张淼, 李林, 郑瀚波, 李盼盼, . 考虑饱和度影响的结构性黄土弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2816-2824.
[2] 李林, 季良, 叶飞, 李尧, . 非饱和原状结构性黄土水-力耦合弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2421-2433.
[3] 徐卫卫, 谢遵党, 傅中志, 米占宽, . 粗粒土真三轴试验南水模型研究及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2559-2572.
[4] 吴嘉园, 王华宁, 宋飞, 胡韬, 蒋明镜, . 考虑能源土软化特性及钻采全过程的井壁稳定半解析模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2121-2134.
[5] 富海鹰, 钟雨薇, 王孝文, 吴博涵, 袁冉, . 基于次加载面理论的砂土临界状态参数模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1788-1798.
[6] 李林, 张等红, 张淼, 顾晓强, 徐龙飞, . 考虑水-力耦合的桩-非饱和黄土接触面荷载传递模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1343-1355.
[7] 张佩, 杨承儒, 侯世伟, 杜修力, . 基于内聚力单元的土石混合体细观数值方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1620-1631.
[8] 祝恩阳, 陈玉堃. 考虑加载速率影响的结构性软黏土统一硬化模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 63-72.
[9] 李宏儒, 梁恒楠, . 不同胶结剂人工结构性黄土的力学特性差异研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1416-1424.
[10] 王元战, 龚晓龙, 王轩, 陈艳萍, 谢涛, . 偏压固结下碱渣土循环累积孔压及强度弱化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 373-380.
[11] 赵顺利, 杨之俊, 傅旭东, 方正, . 考虑应变局部化的粗粒料剪切损伤力学机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 31-42.
[12] 尹振宇, 陈佳莹, 吴则祥, 金银富, . 基于MATLAB GUI的本构模型模拟器开发[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 524-532.
[13] 董建华, 徐斌, 吴晓磊, 连博, . 隧道分级让压支护作用下围岩 弹塑性变形全过程解析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(8): 2123-2135.
[14] 焦钰祺, 贺林林, 梁越, 刘旭菲, . 考虑结构性黏土应变软化效应的 桩靴竖向承载特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1374-1382.
[15] 王永红, 杜文, 张国辉, 宋扬, . 基于广义张−朱强度准则的深埋隧道 围岩塑性分析及应用探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(3): 819-830.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!