岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1): 75-87.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0267

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

含预制单裂隙花岗岩的真三轴单面临空岩爆试验研究

罗丹旎1, 2, 3,卢思航2, 3,苏国韶2, 3,陶洪辉1   

  1. 1. 中国能源建设集团广西电力设计研究院有限公司,广西 南宁 530007;2. 广西大学 土木建筑工程学院,广西 南宁 530004; 3. 广西大学 广西岩溶区水安全与智慧调控工程研究中心,广西 南宁 530004
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-08 接受日期:2022-04-24 出版日期:2023-01-16 发布日期:2023-01-12
  • 通讯作者: 陶洪辉,男,1976年生,硕士,教授级高工,主要从事水工结构安全分析研究方面的工作。E-mail: 237512819@qq.com E-mail:luodn@gxu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:罗丹旎,女,1988年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩石力学实验研究方面的工作。
  • 基金资助:
    中国博士后科学基金资助(No. 2018M633299);国家自然科学基金资助(No. 52179125,No. 51709050)。

Experimental study on rock burst of granite with prefabricated single crack under true-triaxial stress condition with a free face

LUO Dan-ni1, 2, 3, LU Si-hang2, 3, SU Guo-shao2, 3, TAO Hong-hui1   

  1. 1. China Energy Engineering Group Guangxi Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd., Nanning, Guangxi 530007, China; 2. School of Civil and Architecture Engineering, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, China; 3. Guangxi Provincial Engineering Research Center of Water Security and Intelligent Control for Karst Region, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, China
  • Received:2022-03-08 Accepted:2022-04-24 Online:2023-01-16 Published:2023-01-12
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2018M633299) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52179125, 51709050).

摘要: 通过开展含预制单裂隙花岗岩的真三轴单面临空岩爆试验,并利用高速摄像系统和声发射(acoustic emission,简称AE)系统监测岩爆过程,探究了不同产状裂隙岩石的破坏模式、强度变形和声发射演化特性,分析了裂隙产状与岩爆过程及弹射动能之间的关系,对比了含裂隙岩石岩爆发生机制与无裂隙完整岩石的差异。有关力学特性的分析表明,随着裂隙倾角的减小,岩样破坏模式大体呈现由“内剪外劈”向“Z型斜剪”变化的趋势,裂隙对岩石强度的削弱作用不断增大。当裂隙倾角小于30°时,岩石峰值应力普遍仅为完整岩样的一半左右;小倾角裂隙的长度越大,岩样岩板劈裂现象变得显著,形成岩爆坑略微变大,且强度折减幅度越大,峰值轴向应变相应变小;裂隙位置向临空面靠近会加剧岩板的劈裂效应,塑性阶段普遍会产生较大变形并萌生大量裂纹,当裂隙已出露且切断临空面将不易形成岩爆坑。有关岩爆过程及弹射动能的分析表明,随着裂隙倾角的减小,岩样弹射动能呈现先显著降低后小幅回升的变化规律,30°倾角为转变拐点;岩样内部裂隙距临空面越近,裂隙岩样的弹射动能越小;树脂填充裂隙使得岩样弹射动能极大提升,而水泥填充的则无明显提升。有关声发射特征的分析表明,裂隙长度越长,裂隙倾角越小,“平静期”相对岩爆过程的时间占比越大,峰后阶段岩爆瞬间的绝对能量占比越小;若裂隙位置靠近临空面,普遍会形成两个“平静期”,AE绝对能量演化曲线也会额外多一次突增;随着裂隙倾角的增大,裂隙岩样b值初期波动阶段的持续时间变长,下降阶段的速率变大,最小b值点与岩爆时刻越相近。大体看来,含裂隙岩石的应变型岩爆发生机制与无裂隙完整岩石是有区别的,其岩爆发生机制主要有剪切破裂型和张拉板裂型两大类。研究成果为裂隙岩石的岩爆灾害发生机制分析、利用声发射手段预警提供了科学依据。

关键词: 岩爆, 岩石, 裂隙, 声发射, 弹射动能

Abstract: A rock burst experiment of granite with prefabricated single crack under the true-triaxial stress condition with a free face was carried out in this paper, and the rock burst process was monitored by high-speed camera system and acoustic emission (AE) system. The failure mode, strength, deformation and AE evolution characteristics of the rocks with different orientations of cracks were investigated. The relationships between crack orientation and rock burst process and ejection kinetic energy was analyzed. The rock burst mechanisms of the rocks with prefabricated single crack and the intact rocks were compared. The analysis of mechanical properties shows that, with the decrease of crack dip angle, the failure mode of rock samples generally changes from "internal shear and external splitting" to "Z-type oblique shear", and the weakening effect of cracks on rock strength is increasing. When the crack dip angle is less than 30°, the peak stress of rock is generally only about half that of the intact rock samples. The larger the length of the small-dip-angle crack is, the more obvious the splitting phenomenon of the rock slab will be, the slightly larger the rock burst pit will be, the larger the strength reduction amplitude will be, and the smaller the peak axial strain will be. The crack close to the free surface of rock samples will aggravate the splitting effect of the rock slab, large deformation and numerous cracks will occur in the plastic stage generally. When the crack is exposed and cuts off the free surface, it will be difficult to form rock burst pits. The analysis of rock burst process and ejection kinetic energy shows that, with the decrease of crack dip angle, the ejection kinetic energy of rock samples decreases significantly first and then increases slightly, the dip angle of 30° is the turning point of transformation. The closer the internal cracks of the rock sample are to the free surface, the smaller the ejection kinetic energy of the rock sample will be. The resin-filled crack greatly increases the ejection kinetic energy of rock sample, but not when cement fills cracks. The analysis of AE characteristics shows that, the longer length and the smaller dip angle of the crack are, the larger the time proportion of "quiet period" to rock burst process is, and the smaller the absolute energy proportion of rock burst in the post-peak stage is. If the crack is close to rock free surface, two "quiet periods" generally appear, and one more sudden rise will also appear in the AE absolute energy evolution curve. With the increase of crack dip angle, the duration of the initial fluctuation stage of b value of rock samples with crack becomes longer, the decrease rate of decline stage becomes larger, and the minimum b value point is closer to the rock burst time. In general, the mechanism of strain-type rock burst in rocks with cracks differs from that in intact rocks. The mechanism of strain-type rock burst in rocks with cracks can be classified into two types: shear-fracture type and tension-slabbing type. The research results provide a scientific basis for the mechanism analysis of rock burst disaster of fractured rocks and the early-warning by using AE technology.

Key words: rock burst, rock, crack, acoustic emission, ejection kinetic energy

中图分类号: TU 452
[1] 苗日成, 唐贝, 祁飞, 江志安, 崔溦, . 随机裂隙岩体滚刀破岩过程离散元模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 541-552.
[2] 付强, 杨科, 刘钦节, 宋涛涛, 吴犇牛, 于鹏, . 交变荷载下围岩−衬砌组合结构界面强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 40-52.
[3] 张胜, 柏巍, 徐鼎平, 郑虹, 江权, 李志伟, 向天兵, . 循环荷载作用下砂岩损伤演化的声发射与电阻率监测及理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 53-66.
[4] 黄曼, 宁昊晟, 洪陈杰, 陶志刚, 刘雨星, 张贺, . 基于第二代负泊松比锚杆加固的充填结构面剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 131-140.
[5] 金解放, 熊慧颖, 肖莜丰, 彭孝旺. 岩石超声波对三维地应力的敏感性及传播衰减特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 183-194.
[6] 李晓照, 闫怀蔚, 李连杰, 戚承志. 预拉脆性岩石动态直接拉伸断裂的宏细观力学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 217-227.
[7] 李槟, 申海萌, 李琦, 李霞颖, . 不同围压条件下花岗岩剪切过程渗透率动态演化规律数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 437-453.
[8] 刘一鸣, 李振, 冯国瑞, 杨鹏, 白锦文, 黄炳雄, 李东, . 循环加卸载下裂隙砂岩声−热响应特征及前兆规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2773-2791.
[9] 黄德昕, 温韬, 陈宁生, . 考虑能量演化的岩石残余强度确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2825-2836.
[10] 王昕琪, 冯子军, 陈正男, 高祺, 阴伟涛, 靳佩桦, 李玉彬, . 超临界水作用下花岗岩裂隙渗流特性演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2847-2858.
[11] 王邺, 王述红, 张泽, 韩博文, 杨润生, . 裂隙及水幕影响下的水封洞库油品运移范围研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2907-2928.
[12] 董源, 胡英国, 刘美山, 李庚泉, 马晨阳. 均质岩石高边坡开挖爆破累积损伤的演化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2929-2942.
[13] 李晓锋, 李海波, 刘黎旺, 傅帅旸, . 冲击荷载作用下岩石动态拉伸破坏特征及细观机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2387-2398.
[14] 王炳文, 刘臣毅, 康明超, 李乾龙, 杨雷, 周森林, 钱垒. 考虑应力的非闭合裂隙岩体损伤机制及裂纹扩展研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2409-2420.
[15] 高帅, 任富强, 常远. 预制单裂隙砂岩注浆过程中的浆液流动特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2505-2515.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!