岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1): 303-316.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0281

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

卸荷蠕变条件下软硬相接岩层非协调变形规律研究

陈星1, 2,李建林1,邓华锋1,党莉3,刘奇1,王兴霞1,王伟1   

  1. 1. 三峡大学 三峡库区地质灾害教育部重点实验室,湖北 宜昌 443002;2. 中国长江三峡集团有限公司 流域枢纽运行管理中心, 湖北 宜昌 443133;3. 中国长江电力股份有限公司 葛洲坝电厂,湖北 宜昌 443002
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-09 接受日期:2022-07-14 出版日期:2023-01-16 发布日期:2023-01-13
  • 通讯作者: 邓华锋,男,1979年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事地质灾害致灾机制与防治方面的研究。E-mail: dhf8010@ctgu.edu.cn E-mail:chen_xing@ctg.com.cn
  • 作者简介:陈星,男,1985年生,博士研究生,高级工程师,主要从事岩土工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 52009069);国家自然科学基金高铁联合基金重点项目(No. U203420054)。

Uncoordinated deformation of soft and hard interconnecting strata under unloading creep conditions

CHEN Xing1, 2, LI Jian-lin1, DENG Hua-feng1, DANG Li3, LIU Qi1 WANG Xing-xia1, WANG Wei1   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Geological Hazards on Three Gorges Reservoir Area, Ministry of Education, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China; 2. River Basin Complex Administration Center, China Three Gorges Corporation, Yichang, Hubei 443133, China; 3. Gezhouba Power Plant, China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd., Yichang, Hubei 443002, China
  • Received:2022-03-09 Accepted:2022-07-14 Online:2023-01-16 Published:2023-01-13
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52009069) and the Key Project of High-speed Railway Joint Funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U203420054).

摘要: 软硬相接岩层在长时间跨度内的蠕变变形可能极为不协调,这对开挖工程安全稳定造成严重威胁。对某水电站引水隧洞同一开挖断面内砂质泥岩和泥质砂岩两种软硬相差较大的岩石进行卸荷条件下的蠕变试验和数值模拟,结果表明:在卸围压条件下,试样侧向蠕变变形较轴向发展更为迅速,呈现出显著的侧向扩容;初始围压水平较高时,试样卸荷蠕变破坏的侧向扩容效应更加显著;泥质砂岩在稳态蠕变阶段变形速率比砂质泥岩更慢,蠕变破坏时的应变值均比砂质泥岩蠕变破坏时的应变值要小,征兆性更弱。基于Burgers模型,引入损伤变量,建立带损伤的蠕变本构模型,模型曲线较好地描述了岩石破坏偏应力水平之前的线性蠕变特征和破坏偏应力水平下的非线性加速蠕变特征;软硬相接岩层蠕变数值模拟表明,蠕变变形初期,软硬相接点变形差别幅度不大,随着时间增长,在交接面处发生层间错动,对围岩整体稳定十分不利,工程实践中应予以足够关注。

关键词: 泥质砂岩, 砂质泥岩, 卸荷, 蠕变, 力学特性, 本构模型, 数值模拟

Abstract: The long-term creep deformation of soft and hard rock strata may be very uncoordinated, which poses a great threat to the safety and stability of excavation engineering. A series of creep tests and numerical simulations were carried out on two types of rocks (i.e., sandy mudstones and argillaceous sandstones) with large differences of hardness in the same excavation section of diversion tunnel of a hydropower station under unloading conditions. Results show that under the condition of unloading confining pressure, the lateral creep deformation of the specimen develops more rapidly than the axial deformation and a significant lateral expansion occurs. The specimen under a higher initial confining pressure exhibited a greater lateral expansion effect in the unloading creep failure. The deformation rate of argillaceous sandstone in the steady creep stage was slower than that of the sandy mudstone. Meanwhile, the strain values of argillaceous sandstone in the creep failure were smaller than those of the sandy mudstone with weaker signs. Based on the Burgers model, damage variables were introduced to establish a creep damage constitutive model. The model curve well described the linear creep characteristics of rocks before the failure deviatoric stress level and the nonlinear accelerated creep characteristics under the failure deviatoric stress level. The numerical simulations of creep deformation of soft and hard rock strata show that at the early stage, the deformation difference between soft and hard rock contact points was not large. With the increase of time, interlayer dislocation occurs at the interface, which is very unfavorable to the overall stability of surrounding rock and should deserve sufficient attention in the engineering practice.

Key words: 泥质砂岩, 砂质泥岩, 卸荷, 蠕变, 力学特性, 本构模型, 数值模拟

中图分类号: TU 452
[1] 孙志亮, 邵敏, 王叶晨梓, 刘忠, 任伟中, 柏巍, 李朋, . 管道破损诱发地面沉降细观模拟与影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 507-518.
[2] 吴俊, 闵一凡, 征西遥, 韩晨, 牛富俊, 朱宝林, . 地质聚合物固化淤泥法制备再生细骨料的压缩变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 159-170.
[3] 侯克鹏, 江帆, 张超, 龚晶汉, . 土石混合体−基岩接触面剪切的基覆面形态效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 271-284.
[4] 赵凯, 马洪岭, 施锡林, 李银平, 杨春和, . 基于蠕变疲劳本构模型的压气蓄能盐穴长期稳定性评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 1-12.
[5] 梁金平, 李小瑞, 荆浩勇, 侯公羽, 苏占东, 张明磊, . 厚壁圆筒围岩试件的屈服机制及卸荷变形破坏特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2676-2686.
[6] 屈俊童, 时启壮, 郭颖杰, 张 翔, 刘 熠, 蒋德阳. 冻融循环作用下冰碛土力学特性及损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2859-2872.
[7] 侯小强, 杨芮, 李瑞冬, 樊小鹏, 郑佳乐, 侯宝胜, . 卵石土混合体随机生成方法与宏细观力学演化特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2967-2979.
[8] 张奇, 王驹, 刘江峰, 曹胜飞, 谢敬礼, 成建峰, . 热-水-力多场耦合下高放废物处置库核心处置单元间距设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2626-2638.
[9] 张海燕, 胡新丽, 李亚博. 周期性渗流-应力耦合下滑带土的蠕变特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2189-2198.
[10] 杨爱武, 程姝晓, 梁振振, 华谦谦, 杨少朋. 高含水率吹填土大变形固结与流变叠加效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1977-1987.
[11] 张培森, 王洪伟, 洪荒, 许大强, 陈增宝, 邓云驰, 梁展, 李金坤, 陈文豪, 崔乾, . 渗流-采动应力耦合作用下深部砂岩力学及能量演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1997-2010.
[12] 张亮亮, 程桦, 姚直书, 王晓健, . 常规三轴压缩条件下岩石蠕变破坏时间预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2011-2022.
[13] 朱先祥, 张琦, 马俊鹏, 王永军, 孟凡贞, . 浆−水置换效应下含水砂层渗透注浆扩散机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1957-1966.
[14] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[15] 杨校辉, 赵子毅, 郭楠, 钱豹, 朱彦鹏, . 横观各向同性非饱和黄土蠕变特性及沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1489-1500.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!