岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (4): 1065-1074.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0968

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑沉积角影响的冻结砂土单轴压缩试验研究

梁靖宇1,沈万涛1,路德春2,齐吉琳1   

  1. 1. 北京建筑大学 土木与交通工程学院,北京 102616;2. 北京工业大学 城市与工程安全减灾教育部重点实验室,北京 100124
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-27 接受日期:2022-08-29 出版日期:2023-04-18 发布日期:2023-04-28
  • 通讯作者: 齐吉琳,男,1969年生,博士,教授,主要从事寒区岩土工程方面的研究。E-mail: jilinqi@bucea.edu.cn E-mail:liangjy@bucea.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:梁靖宇,男,1988年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事岩土工程特性及其本构理论方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52108294,No.41972279,No.52025084);北京市博士后基金(No.2021-zz-116);北京建筑大学市属高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(No.X21077)。

Uniaxial compression test of frozen sand considering the effect of the deposition angle

LIANG Jing-yu1, SHEN Wan-tao1, LU De-chun2, QI Ji-lin1   

  1. 1. School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
  • Received:2022-06-27 Accepted:2022-08-29 Online:2023-04-18 Published:2023-04-28
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52108294, 41972279, 52025084), the Beijing Postdoctoral Research Foundation (2021-zz-116) and the Fundamental Research Funds for Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture(X21077).

摘要: 寒区工程中的土颗粒在重力作用下沿优势方向沉积排列而形成横观各向同性冻土材料。不考虑沉积方向与荷载方向之间沉积角的影响可能会错误估计实际工程中冻土的变形特征与承载力。然而,现有文献尚未探究沉积角对冻土工程特性的影响。针对这一问题,开展了不同温度条件下沉积角对冻土单轴压缩变形与强度特性影响的试验研究。通过所研发的制样模具制备了具有4种不同沉积角δ 的冻土试样(δ = 0º、30º、60º和90º),在设定的4种不同温度T条件下(T = −5、−10、−15 ℃和−20 ℃)对具有不同沉积角δ 的冻土试样开展了单轴压缩试验,分析了T与δ 对冻土的变形模式、破坏特征以及单轴抗压强度的显著影响。根据冻土应力−应变曲线的归一化结果及其软化段斜率的变化规律,将冻土单轴压缩变形模式在T与δ 影响下分为变形模式I、II 和 III。根据结果可知,随着 T 降低以及δ  趋于60º,冻土的变形模式趋于由变形模式I 过渡到变形模式III,试样破坏模式由鼓胀的X形剪切带破坏趋于破坏范围较小的单剪切面破坏,而冻土单轴抗压强度随T降低而增大的同时,随δ 增加表现出先减小后增大的趋势。

关键词: 横观各向同性, 沉积角, 冻土, 单轴压缩试验, 力学特性

Abstract: Soil particles in cold regions are deposited and arranged along the dominant direction due to gravity, forming transversely isotropic frozen soils. Without considering the effect of the deposition angle between the deposition direction and the load direction, the deformation characteristics and bearing capacity of the actual geotechnical engineering in cold regions may be misestimated. However, the effect of deposition angle on the mechanical properties of frozen soil has not been explored in the existing literature. In response to this problem, the uniaxial compressive tests under different temperature conditions were carried out in this paper to examine the effect of deposition angle on the mechanical behaviors of frozen soil. With the developed sample preparation mould, frozen soil samples with four different deposition angles δ (δ = 0º, 30º, 60º and 90º) were prepared. Uniaxial compression tests on these frozen soil samples were carried out at four different temperature conditions T (T = −5, −10, −15 ℃ and −20 ℃). The significant effects of T and δ  on deformation mode, failure behaviors and uniaxial compressive strength of frozen soil are analyzed. The uniaxial compressive stress-strain curves of frozen soil at certain T and δ are normalized, and the slope variation rule of the softened section is also analyzed. According to the above analysis, the deformation modes of the frozen soil under the effect of T andδ  are divided into three deformation modes, i.e., I, II and III. According to the test results, it can be observed that as T decreases and δ  tends to 60º, the deformation mode of frozen soil tends to transition from deformation mode I to deformation mode III, and the failure model tends to transition from the expansion failure mode with the X-shaped shear band to the single shear plane failure mode with a smaller failure range. The uniaxial compressive strength of frozen soil increases with the decrease of T, and shows a trend of first decreasing and then increasing with the increase of δ .

Key words: transversely isotropy, deposition angle, frozen soil, uniaxial compression test, mechanical properties

中图分类号: TU445
[1] 吴俊, 闵一凡, 征西遥, 韩晨, 牛富俊, 朱宝林, . 地质聚合物固化淤泥法制备再生细骨料的压缩变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 159-170.
[2] 蔡玉娟, 蔡静森, 任少文, 刘锴, 陈劲, 李漪, . 岩溶区非均质岩组岩体力学参数快速估计方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2749-2762.
[3] 屈俊童, 时启壮, 郭颖杰, 张 翔, 刘 熠, 蒋德阳. 冻融循环作用下冰碛土力学特性及损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2859-2872.
[4] 侯小强, 杨芮, 李瑞冬, 樊小鹏, 郑佳乐, 侯宝胜, . 卵石土混合体随机生成方法与宏细观力学演化特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2967-2979.
[5] 张培森, 王洪伟, 洪荒, 许大强, 陈增宝, 邓云驰, 梁展, 李金坤, 陈文豪, 崔乾, . 渗流-采动应力耦合作用下深部砂岩力学及能量演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1997-2010.
[6] 杨校辉, 赵子毅, 郭楠, 钱豹, 朱彦鹏, . 横观各向同性非饱和黄土蠕变特性及沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1489-1500.
[7] 宋勇军, 卢云龙, 王双龙, 谢丽君, 操警辉, 安旭晨, . 岩石冻融过程未冻水含量演化特征及对力学特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1049-1059.
[8] 朱元广, 王璇尧, 刘滨, 刘学伟, 薛皓元, 耿志, . 层状岩石横观各向同性蠕变损伤本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1095-1108.
[9] 张涛艺, 王家全, 林志南, 唐毅, . 细粒含量对砾性土路基劣化及静力剪切特性影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1141-1152.
[10] 张智卿, 刘鑫, 刘开富, 吴君涛, 吴文兵, . 横观各向同性土体中端承桩水平振动特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3371-3382.
[11] 吕志涛, 赵志远, 蔡毅, 夏才初, 段君义. 单向冻融作用下砂岩力学各向异性演化与损伤模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3421-3430.
[12] 唐劲舟, 唐文豪, 杨科, 赵延林, 刘钦节, 段敏克, 谭哲, . 循环荷载作用下含倾斜单裂隙砂岩力学响应特征及渗流演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 199-212.
[13] 李宗恩, 刘星炎, 郑青松, 胡琪, 潘乾通, . 连通率对不同倾角结构面岩样力学特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 244-256.
[14] 张瑨, 李书恒, 朱其志, 石玲玲, 邵建富, . 基于深度学习的岩石短长期本构模型及灰砂岩变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 289-302.
[15] 王辉, 钮新强, 马刚, 周伟, . 干湿循环作用下堆石料宏细观力学特性的离散元模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 665-676.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!