岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (4): 1204-1216.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0741

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

穿越不同密实度饱和砂土地层的盾构隧道地震响应三维数值分析

吴宏1,叶治1,张宇亭2,刘华北1   

  1. 1. 华中科技大学 土木与水利工程学院,湖北 武汉 430074;2. 交通运输部天津水运工程科学研究所 岩土工程研究中心,天津 300456
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-18 接受日期:2022-09-08 出版日期:2023-04-18 发布日期:2023-04-29
  • 通讯作者: 刘华北,男,1973年生,博士,教授,主要从事土工合成材料加筋技术、土工结构抗震等工作。E-mail: hbliu@hust.edu.cn E-mail:wuhong.phd@gmail.com
  • 作者简介:吴宏,男,1993年生,博士研究生,主要从事地下结构抗震的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51978305);中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金(No.TKS20220107)。

Numerical study on seismic behavior of shield tunnel crossing saturated sandy strata with different densities

WU Hong1, YE Zhi1, ZHANG Yu-ting2, LIU Hua-bei1   

  1. 1. School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China; 2. Geotechnical Engineering Research Center, Tianjin Research Institute for Water Transport Engineering, of Ministry of Transport, Tianjin 300456, China
  • Received:2022-05-18 Accepted:2022-09-08 Online:2023-04-18 Published:2023-04-29
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51978305) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Public Welfare Research Institutes (TKS20220107).

摘要: 地震液化对隧道结构有重大威胁,且位于不同抗液化能力地层交界处的盾构隧道段更易发生严重的地震破坏。采用三维数值方法研究穿越不同密实度状态饱和砂土地层的盾构隧道的地震响应规律。饱和砂土用一种描述不同密实度砂土液化行为的边界面模型进行模拟,首先通过隧道液化上浮的振动台试验结果验证该本构模型的合理性。其次,应用多自由度连接弹簧表征管片环间相互作用,采用文献中的拼装管片的逐级加载试验结果验证该方法的可行性。最后,建立穿越两种不同密实度饱和砂土地层的盾构隧道三维数值模型,研究相对密实度、输入加速度峰值和交界面倾角对砂土地层−盾构隧道系统动力响应的影响。结果表明,可液化地层中隧道结构位移模式是水平地震激励下产生的水平位移与由于液化上浮效应产生的竖向位移的耦合作用,加之隧道在不同土层中变形存在差异,从而导致隧道呈现扭转的变形形态。在靠近交界面处,隧道整体上浮量急剧变化且该处结构上浮量随着交界面倾角增大而增大,同时管片结构弯矩出现突变,接头螺栓的环间剪切和拉伸位移也显著增加。分析结果进一步印证地震作用下盾构隧道在不同性质饱和砂土地层交界面处更易破坏,在设计阶段应予以重点关注。

关键词: 饱和土层交界, 盾构隧道, 地震响应, 变形模式, 砂土液化

Abstract: Earthquake-induced liquefaction poses a significant threat to tunnel structures. Particularly, shield tunnel crossing sandy stratums with different liquefaction susceptibilities could suffer more severe seismic damages near the soil interface. In this paper, a three-dimensional numerical study was carried out to investigate the seismic response of a shield tunnel passing through saturated sandy strata with two different relative densities. Firstly, a practice-oriented two-surface plasticity sand model was employed to model the sandy soil and was validated by shaking table experiments on a tunnel structure embedded in liquefiable soil. Secondly, a deformable force-displacement link model for circumferential joints between each successive segmental ring was employed to model the interactions between segmental rings. The approach was validated using the results of two loading experiments on model segmental linings from the literature. Finally, the 3D numerical model was established considering various relative densities of soil, peak input accelerations, and the dip angle of the interface. The results indicate that the tunnel’s horizontal displacements due to seismic excitations are coupled with the liquefaction-induced vertical uplift displacements, and the tunnel’s deformation is not simultaneous in the two soil strata, resulting in twisting distortion of the tunnel structure. The uplifts of tunnel change rapidly and are increased by the rising of the dip angle near the soil interface. Also, the bending moments suddenly change, and the shearing/tensile displacements of joints increase remarkably, which confirms that the seismic design of shield tunnel segments near the soil interface is a critical issue.

Key words: saturated soil interface, shield tunnel, earthquake responses, deformation mode, soil liquefaction

中图分类号: TU43
[1] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[2] 宋利埼, 章敏, 徐筱, 孙静雯, 俞奎, 李昕尧, . 考虑管片接头转动效应的盾构隧道光纤反演分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2483-2494.
[3] 宋牧原, 杨明辉, 陈伟, 卢贤锥, . 基于自注意力-循环神经网络模型的盾构引发的土体沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2613-2625.
[4] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[5] 刘健, 夏勇, 江权, 陈涛, 贺维国, 范国刚, 熊先涛, 郑虹, . 强烈构造区硬梁包水电站地下洞室群围岩变形破坏特征与泸定地震响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2265-2280.
[6] 杨景泉, 郑长杰, 丁选明, . 竖向入射P波激励下饱和土中管桩地震响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1477-1488.
[7] 黄明华, 钟煜轩, 陆锦斌, 王克平. 基于非连续地基梁模型的基坑开挖诱发下卧盾构隧道变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 492-504.
[8] 谢立夫, 关振长, 黄明, 丘华生, 许超. 考虑主动铰接的盾构-地层相互作用模型及求解研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3574-3584.
[9] 真嘉捷, 赖丰文, 黄明, 廖清香, 李爽, 段岳强. 基于时序聚类和在线学习的盾构掘进地层智能识别方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3615-3625.
[10] 周桓竹, 刘圣安, 李斌, 陈炜昀, 苏雷, 郑俊杰, 郑烨炜, . 穿越变化地层的沉管隧道接头地震响应的解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 289-298.
[11] 黄大维, 刘家璇, 谭满生, 邓翔浩, 黄永亮, 翁友华, 陈升平, . 盾构隧道底部注浆抬升模拟试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 371-381.
[12] 王小刚, 杨建平, 陈卫忠, 李慧, . 盾构隧道结构响应特征及接缝刚度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 485-495.
[13] 宋洋, 王贺平, 张维东, 赵立财, 周健华, 毛镜涵, . 恒定法向刚度条件下加锚充填节理岩体剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2695-2706.
[14] 许文昊, 王志华, 申志福, 高洪梅, 刘殷强, 张鑫磊, . 基于CFD-DEM方法的饱和砂土场地液化模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2492-2501.
[15] 李金宇, 王伟, 王浩宇, 杨研科, 徐凯放, 张晓庆, 熊文. 地震序列作用下液化场地条件影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1551-1559.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!