岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 1575-1584.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1125

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

水位变化下含裂缝非饱和土挡墙的地震主动土压力研究

张常光1, 2,关港辉1,李海祥1,范家燊1,石晶1   

  1. 1. 长安大学 建筑工程学院,陕西 西安 710061;2. 成都理工大学 地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室,四川 成都 610059
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-19 接受日期:2022-10-31 出版日期:2023-06-14 发布日期:2023-06-14
  • 作者简介:张常光,男,1982年生,博士,教授,主要从事非饱和土与地下工程等方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室开放基金(No.SKLGP2020K022);长安大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(No.300102282206);陕西省自然科学基金(No.2021JM-165,No.2021JM-170)。

Seismic active earth pressure on a retaining wall in unsaturated soils with cracks for changing water table

ZHANG Chang-guang1, 2, GUAN Gang-hui1, LI Hai-xiang1, FAN Jia-shen1, SHI Jing1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710061, China; 2. Stake Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, Chin
  • Received:2022-07-19 Accepted:2022-10-31 Online:2023-06-14 Published:2023-06-14
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Opening Fund of State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection (SKLGP2020K022), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Chang’an University (300102282206) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (2021JM-165, 2021JM-170).

摘要: 高烈度区挡墙抗震设计的主要荷载是地震主动土压力。首先根据水位、缝深和墙踵的相对位置关系,提出了含裂缝非饱和土挡墙在高、中、低水位下地震主动土压力分析的3种力学模型;继而通过拟动力法计算墙后滑动土体的地震效应,运用非饱和土力学原理与极限平衡法建立了水位变化下倾斜挡墙的地震主动土压力解答,并给出了迭代应用步骤、对比文献理论解答与振动台实测;最后探讨了水位、缝深以及土体非饱和特性对地震主动土压力系数的影响规律。研究结果表明:所得非饱和土挡墙地震主动土压力解答综合考虑了水位、缝深与土体非饱和特性,能退化为经典土压力公式,与文献理论解答、振动台实测吻合良好且应用较便捷,具有重要理论意义和良好的应用前景;地震主动土压力受水位、缝深、基质吸力、吸力分布与吸力角的影响均很显著,需采用工程措施维持基质吸力、吸力分布、低水位、小缝深等稳定存在以优化挡墙抗震设计。

关键词: 地震主动土压力, 非饱和土, 拟动力法, 墙后水位, 土体裂缝

Abstract: Seismic active earth pressure is the primary load for retaining wall design in high earthquake-intensity areas. Based on the relative position relationship among water table, crack depth and wall heel, this study firstly presented three mechanical models of seismic active earth pressure on retaining walls in unsaturated soils with cracks, which corresponded separately to high/medium/low water tables. The pseudo-dynamic method was then employed to calculate the seismic effect of sliding soils behind a retaining wall. The solution of seismic active earth pressure on inclined retaining walls for changing water table was derived by adopting mechanical principles of unsaturated soils and the limit equilibrium method. The iterative steps to be easily conducted were provided, and the proposed solution was compared with the results of theoretical analysis and the shaking table test available in the literature. Finally, the influences of water table, crack depth and unsaturated soil characteristics on the seismic active earth pressure coefficient were discussed. The results show that the proposed solution well considers the effects of water table, crack depth and unsaturated soil characteristics, which can be degraded to the classical earth pressure equation. Additionally, it agrees well with the existing theoretical solution and measured data of the shaking table test. Consequently, the proposed solution has an important theoretical significance and good application prospect. The influences of water table, crack depth, matric suction, suction distribution and suction angle on the seismic active earth pressure are all apparent. In order to optimize the seismic design of a retaining wall, engineering measures should be taken to maintain stable existence of matric suction, suction distribution, low water table and small crack depth.

Key words: seismic active earth pressure, unsaturated soils, pseudo-dynamics method, water table behind a retaining wall, soil crack

中图分类号: TU476.4
[1] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[2] 方薇, 吴润丰, 周春梅, . 基于包络壳模型的非饱和土朗肯被动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[3] 张振光, 徐杰, 范家燊, . 不排水条件下非饱和土球孔扩张的塑性新解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1988-1996.
[4] 尚召伟, 孔令伟, 鄢俊彪, 高志傲, 王斐, 黎澄生, . 非饱和花岗岩残积土的小应变剪切模量特性与其持水特征曲线确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1131-1140.
[5] 张振光, 徐杰, 李海祥, . 考虑中间主应力的非饱和土竖井主动土压力滑移线解答[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3045-3053.
[6] 叶云雪, 易博文, 刘小文, 吴珺华, 洪本根, . 脱湿路径下土体水分变化路径及体积变形对滤纸法测定土-水特征曲线的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2351-2361.
[7] 柳鸿博, 戴国亮, 周凤玺, 龚志宇, 陈智伟, . 黏弹性非饱和土中劲性复合桩纵向动力响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1365-1377.
[8] 彭俊国, 黄宇豪. 非饱和边坡中锚托板锚固尺寸的新算法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1003-1013.
[9] 张思奇, 裴华富, 谭道远, 朱鸿鹄, . 单、双孔隙结构非饱和黏土孔隙分布变化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 353-363.
[10] 陈可, 王琛, 梁发云, 汪中卫, . 考虑水力滞后与变形耦合的非饱和土持水曲线模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3694-3704.
[11] 邵帅, 邵生俊, 高梦洁, 刘小康, 王立新, 严广艺, . 水-力耦合非饱和黄土的弹塑性模型适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 436-442.
[12] 周凤玺, 姚桃岐, 柳鸿博, . 非饱和土中Rayleigh波传播的能量特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 612-622.
[13] 赵煜鑫, 李旭, 林森, 王逍萌, . 广吸力范围内一种改进的非饱和土抗剪强度模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 990-1000.
[14] 牛庚, 朱晓凤, 李俊星, 吕梦缘, 安荔琪, 陈子晗, . 宽广吸力范围非饱和土剪切强度试验研究及其预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3349-3359.
[15] 赵煜鑫, 李 旭, 赵红芬, 刘 艳. 宽饱和度范围非饱和土抗剪强度指标的演化模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 2809-2820.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!