岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 1625-1635.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1103

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑微拱效应的隧道洞口段管棚合理间距确定方法及参数分析

张小波1, 2,张雕1,姚池1,杨建华1,蒋水华1,荣耀2   

  1. 1. 南昌大学 工程建设学院,江西 南昌 330031;2. 江西省交通科学研究院有限公司,江西 南昌 330200
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-14 接受日期:2023-01-03 出版日期:2023-06-14 发布日期:2023-06-14
  • 通讯作者: 姚池,男,1986年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土力学与数值方法方面的研究。E-mail: chi.yao@ncu.edu.cn E-mail:zhangxb@ncu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:张小波,男,1989年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土与地下工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52068033,No.52004127);中国博士后科学基金(No.2021M691358);江西省交通运输厅科技项目(No.2021Z0002);江西省研究生创新专项资金项目(No.YC2022 s075);南昌大学学位与研究生教育改革研究项目(No.NCUYJSJG-2022-071)。

Determination method and parameter analysis of reasonable spacing of pipe-shed support in tunnel portal section considering micro-arch effect

ZHANG Xiao-bo1, 2, ZHANG Diao1, YAO Chi1, YANG Jian-hua1, JIANG Shui-hua1, RONG Yao2   

  1. 1. School of Infrastructure Engineering, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330031 China; 2. Jiangxi Transportation Research Institute Co., Ltd., Nanchang, Jiangxi 330200, China
  • Received:2022-07-14 Accepted:2023-01-03 Online:2023-06-14 Published:2023-06-14
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52068033, 52004127), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M691358), the Jiangxi Provincial Department of Transportation Science and Technology Project (2021Z0002), the Jiangxi Province Graduate Innovation Special Fund Project (YC2022 s075) and the Nanchang University Degree and Graduate Education Reform Research Project (NCUYJSJG-2022-071).

摘要: 管棚支护是隧道工程在复杂地质环境中常用的辅助施工手段,其主要依靠管间微拱效应发挥支护作用,而微拱的形成和破坏与管棚间距密切相关。综合考虑侧向土压力及微拱截面应力的非均匀分布特征,确定了考虑侧向土压力作用的微拱合理拱轴线形状,并推导了其标准方程,结合微拱的破坏条件提出了管棚合理间距的计算方法。对所提出的方法进行工程算例分析,并与已有关于管棚间距的计算方法进行了对比,验证了该方法的合理性。在此基础上,对影响管棚间距的主要参数进行分析,研究结果表明:管棚间距与拱顶荷载呈负相关关系,与管棚直径、土体黏聚力呈线性正相关关系,与土体内摩擦角呈非线性正相关关系,且土体内摩擦角的增大对管棚间距增大的影响也随之增大。随荷载的增大,上述参数对管棚间距的影响均减弱。

关键词: 隧道洞口, 微拱效应, 侧向土压力, 拱轴线, 管棚间距

Abstract: Pipe-shed support is a commonly used auxiliary construction method for tunnel engineering in complex geological environments, and it mainly relies on the micro-arch effect between pipes to play a supporting role. The formation and failure of micro arches are closely related to the spacing between pipe-sheds. After considering the lateral earth pressure and the non-uniform distribution of micro-arch section stress, the shape of the rational arch axis is determined and its standard equation of micro-arch is derived. By combining the failure conditions of micro-arch, a calculation method of rational pipe-shed spacing is obtained. Several engineering cases are adopted to verify the proposed method and the rationality of the method is validated by comparing with existing calculation methods of pipe-shed spacing. On this basis, the main parameters affecting the pipe-shed spacing are analyzed. The results show that the pipe-shed spacing is negatively correlated with the vault load. The pipe-shed spacing increases linearly with the increase of pipe-shed diameter and soil cohesion, and increases in nonlinear with the internal friction angle of soil. Significantly, the increase of internal friction angle of soil has an increasing impact on the pipe-shed spacing. However, the influence of the above parameters on the pipe-shed spacing is weakened with the increase of load.

Key words: tunnel entrance, micro-arch effect, lateral earth pressure, arch axis, pipe-shed spacing

中图分类号: TU94
[1] 冯海洲, 蒋关鲁, 何梓雷, 郭玉丰, 胡金山, 李杰, 袁胜洋, . 预应力锚索桩板墙加固隧道洞口边坡的动力响应特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 50-62.
[2] 任洋, 李天斌, 赖林. 强震区隧道洞口段边坡动力响应 特征离心振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1605-1612.
[3] 陈 峥, 何 平, 颜杜民, 高红杰, . 考虑土拱效应的管棚合理间距计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1993-2000.
[4] 赖汉江 ,郑俊杰 ,章荣军 ,张 军 ,崔明娟,. 桩承式路堤土拱形成及荷载传递机制离散元分析[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 646-650.
[5] 王帅帅,高 波,隋传毅,闻毓民. 不同地质条件下隧道洞口仰坡地震破坏特性研究[J]. , 2014, 35(S1): 278-284.
[6] 佟建兴,闫明礼,王明山,孙训海,杨新辉. 刚性桩复合地基侧向土压力试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(6): 1572-1578.
[7] 魏焕卫,宋丰波,杨 敏,孙剑平. 基于明德林解的土钉内力计算方法[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 6-14.
[8] 崔文杰,姚仰平. 渐近状态土压力计算方法[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3574-3578.
[9] 冷伍明,杨 奇,刘庆潭,聂如松. 软基高桥台桩-土相互作用计算新方法研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3079-3085.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!