岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (7): 2005-2016.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1160

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑渗流的饱和粉土地层盾构开挖面稳定分析

尹鑫晟1, 2, 3,舒营4,梁禄钜1,张世民1   

  1. 1. 浙大城市学院 工程学院,浙江 杭州 310015;2. 浙江省城市盾构隧道安全建造与智能养护重点实验室,浙江 杭州 310015; 3. 城市基础设施智能化浙江省工程研究中心,浙江 杭州 310015;4. 安徽理工大学 土木建筑学院,安徽 淮南 232001
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-26 接受日期:2022-11-23 出版日期:2023-07-17 发布日期:2023-07-16
  • 通讯作者: 张世民,男,1974年生,硕士,教授,主要从事岩土工程的研究。E-mail: zhangsm@zucc.edu.cn E-mail:yinxs@zucc.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:尹鑫晟,男,1989年生,博士,副教授,主要从事盾构隧道研究。
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省教育厅科研计划项目(No.Y201839147);浙江省自然科学基金项目(No.LY21E080004);杭州市科技局规划项目(No.2020ZDSJ0639);浙江省住建厅科研项目(No.2020K074)。

Stability analysis of shield excavation surface in saturated silt strata considering seepage

YIN Xin-sheng1, 2, 3, SHU Ying4, LIANG Lu-ju1, ZHANG Shi-min1   

  1. 1. School of Engineering, Hangzhou City University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310015, China; 2. Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Safety Construction and Intelligent Maintenance of Urban Shield Tunnels, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310015, China; 3. Zhejiang Engineering Research Center for Intelligent Urban Infrastructure, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310015, China; 4. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, Anhui 232001, China
  • Received:2022-07-26 Accepted:2022-11-23 Online:2023-07-17 Published:2023-07-16
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Scientific Research Program of Zhejiang Provincial Education Department (Y201839147), the Natural Science Foundation Project of Zhejiang (LY21E080004), the Planning Project of Hangzhou Science and Technology Bureau (2020ZDSJ0639) and the Scientific Research Project of Zhejiang Provincial Department of Housing and Construction (2020K074).

摘要: 土压平衡盾构在穿越高水位钱塘江粉土地层时,地下水与密封舱之间的高水压差会产生过大的指向开挖面的渗透力。钱塘江粉土黏聚力低,开挖面自立性差,且土体模量小,过大的渗透力会使土体产生更大的变形,导致开挖面失稳。数值模拟中合理选取土的本构关系与模型参数,对计算结果的可靠性十分重要。为了研究渗流条件下开挖面稳定性问题,基于室内试验,对钱塘江粉土的摩尔−库仑本构模型和摩尔−库仑应变软化本构模型参数进行研究。研究发现,钱塘江粉土的剪应变是轴向应变的1.5倍;根据三轴卸荷试验得到应变软化内摩擦角和剪应变的关系,当剪应变为4.7%时内摩擦角达到峰值为25º,剪应变为7.4%时内摩擦角达到残余值为21º,剪应变在4.7%~7.4%之间时,内摩擦角线性减小。采用有限差分软件建立39组三维分析模型,通过与离心机试验的极限支护压力和地表沉降对比发现,相同水位情况下,摩尔−库仑应变软化本构模型计算的极限支护压力与离心机试验的最小误差为3.1%,最大地表沉降的误差为5.67%。证明了在钱塘江粉土地层中使用摩尔−库仑应变软化本构模型的可行性及模型参数的可靠性。

关键词: 数值模拟, 开挖面稳定性, 渗流, 本构模型, 钱塘江粉土

Abstract: When the earth pressure balance shield crosses the high water-level Qiantang River silt layer, the high water pressure difference between the groundwater and the sealing chamber will generate excessive infiltration force toward the excavation surface. The excessive infiltration force will cause large deformation of the soil and thus leading to destabilization of the excavation surface because of the low cohesion of Qiantang River silt, poor self-supporting of the excavation surface and small modulus of the soil. The reasonable selection of soil constitutive relationship and model parameters in numerical simulations are very important for the reliability of numerical results. In order to study the stability of the excavation surface under seepage conditions, the parameters of the Mohr-Coulomb model and its strain-softening model of the Qiantang River silt were investigated based on laboratory tests. It was found that the shear strain of the Qiantang River silt was 1.5 times of the axial strain. According to the triaxial unloading test, the relationship between the strain softening internal friction angle and the shear strain is obtained. The internal friction angle reaches a peak value of 25º when the shear strain is 4.7%; the internal friction angle reaches a residual value of 21º when the shear strain is 7.4%; the internal friction angle decreases linearly when the shear strain is between 4.7% and 7.4%. Then the finite difference method was used to establish 39 groups of three-dimensional analytical models. By comparing with the ultimate support force and surface settlement of the centrifuge test, it was found that under the same water level, the minimum error between the ultimate support pressure calculated by the Mohr-Coulomb strain-softening model and the centrifuge test was 3.1%, and the error of the maximum surface settlement was 5.67%. It proves the feasibility of the Mohr-Coulomb strain-softening model and the reliability of the model parameters in the Qiantang River silt formation.

Key words: numerical simulation, excavation surface stability, seepage, constitutive model, Qiantang River silt

中图分类号: U45;TU473
[1] 侯克鹏, 江帆, 张超, 龚晶汉, . 土石混合体−基岩接触面剪切的基覆面形态效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 271-284.
[2] 赵凯, 马洪岭, 施锡林, 李银平, 杨春和, . 基于蠕变疲劳本构模型的压气蓄能盐穴长期稳定性评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 1-12.
[3] 孙志亮, 邵敏, 王叶晨梓, 刘忠, 任伟中, 柏巍, 李朋, . 管道破损诱发地面沉降细观模拟与影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 507-518.
[4] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[5] 王昕琪, 冯子军, 陈正男, 高祺, 阴伟涛, 靳佩桦, 李玉彬, . 超临界水作用下花岗岩裂隙渗流特性演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2847-2858.
[6] 屈俊童, 时启壮, 郭颖杰, 张 翔, 刘 熠, 蒋德阳. 冻融循环作用下冰碛土力学特性及损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2859-2872.
[7] 靳贵晓, 林劭聪, 姜启武, 黄明, 李熹, . 基于Kozeny-Carman方程的酶诱导碳酸钙沉淀固化砂土的渗流数学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2376-2386.
[8] 吴兵, 盛建龙, 叶祖洋, 周新, . 单裂隙岩体非线性渗流-法向应力耦合模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2495-2504.
[9] 张奇, 王驹, 刘江峰, 曹胜飞, 谢敬礼, 成建峰, . 热-水-力多场耦合下高放废物处置库核心处置单元间距设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2626-2638.
[10] 杨爱武, 程姝晓, 梁振振, 华谦谦, 杨少朋. 高含水率吹填土大变形固结与流变叠加效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1977-1987.
[11] 张海燕, 胡新丽, 李亚博. 周期性渗流-应力耦合下滑带土的蠕变特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2189-2198.
[12] 任旺, 苗君, 雷万钧, 王络, 陈益峰, . 混凝土坝坝基立体排水的数值模拟与优化设计[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2281-2295.
[13] 朱先祥, 张琦, 马俊鹏, 王永军, 孟凡贞, . 浆−水置换效应下含水砂层渗透注浆扩散机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1957-1966.
[14] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[15] 刘杰, 钟伦伟, 钟振, 张宪尚, 隆清明, 应鹏, . 恒定法向刚度边界条件下受剪岩石裂隙非线性渗流特性的数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1919-1933.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!